It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: pirhanna
It's not just about vaccinations though.
It's about individual rights and freedoms.
originally posted by: Metallicus
Complete Title: Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson just sold out to Big Pharma...says children should be forcibly injected with mercury at gunpoint... claims government 'science' overrides medical freedom
So much for an 'alternative' candidate. When you run as a Libertarian you should be about freedom not Government and Big Pharma. I am thoroughly disgusted with Johnson. For someone who loves freedom he sure comes down on the wrong side of a bunch of issues. I think this guy is owned by big money just like Hilary. Once again I am forced to vote for Trump. Ugh.
Wow, the 2016 Presidential race is getting more bizarre by the day, it seems, and the latest example of people wandering off into la la land is found in libertarian party candidate Gary Johnson. He just announced that whatever chemicals and viral strains the corrupt, scientifically incompetent federal government decides should be injected into your children must be obediently accepted by parents or they should face arrest, imprisonment or gunpoint enforcement.
Gary Johnson, in other words, has just had official immunization science "splained" to him and has now surrendered the entire idea of liberty upon which the libertarian party was founded. Suddenly, your human rights -- medical choice rights -- are no longer considered inalienable by Gary Johnson, who believes that people should be forced against their will to be injected with toxic substances linked to comas, seizures, autism, cancer, neurological disorders, paralyzation and even death.
Source
Otherwise, not all children will be immune even though they receive a vaccine.
originally posted by: Raggedyman
Now don't get me wrong I am not against immunization but
Those not immunized will get sick and die
They have made a choice, what is that to you.
If you are immunized you are protected, what is it to you
If other people choose not to look after their childrens' health - am I supposed to try to stop them? They will continue to do stupid and irresponsible things, and apparently it's a stupid and irresponsible thing for me to try to educate them and stop them allowing their children to be vulnerable to plagues......
originally posted by: DBCowboy
Once you give the government the authority to mandate what your child should get, then you have given up all rights to determine.
You are just trusting that the government is never wrong.
Since you want government to mandate this, then you must have complete trust that the government is never wrong.