Benghazi emails found from Clinton's DELETED cache

originally posted by: Blazemore2000
You know what this place needs?

More Benghazi threads.

Seriously.

Never before has so much been made (up) about so little.

More please.

Especially when those threads are popular and factual.

a reply to: Annee

4 dead men who WERE her promised responsibility UNDER AN OATH of service,she abandoned is PLENTY enough for any SANE individual to figure it. (as IF she gave a crap),wether by incompetence or intent to hide the gun running or attempting to extort more money for the Foundation I think we pretty well have know her since her "GOLDWATER girl" days we know EXACTLY who she is and we won't have this fiasco again.

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Blazemore2000
You know what this place needs?

More Benghazi threads.

Seriously.

Never before has so much been made (up) about so little.

More please.

Especially when those threads are popular and factual.

"FACTS" in here are loosely interpreted.

originally posted by: cavtrooper7
a reply to: Annee

4 dead men who WERE her promised responsibility,wether by incompetence or intent to hide the gun running.

Yes, I know you believe the version you want to.

a reply to: xuenchen

Well, I've yet to see a factual one... and if you judge things based on popularity, well... that says more about you than it does about anything else.

Remind me again why a Republican controlled Congress cut funding for Embassy defense?

a reply to: Annee

I AM and have the skills to discern.
I suppose it all ties in with your asinine opinion of globalism and how you want it NOW.
SHE is done ,and WE get to watch the melt down.
It'll no doubt kill her.

originally posted by: Xeven
When Hillary the worlds most corrupt arrogant disgusting human on earth is in charge of the worlds most powerful military, law enforcement, intelligent agencies etc...there will be hell to pay for those of us who do not support her or spoke the truths about her on the internet.

holy # didn't think about that

a reply to: Blazemore2000

Interesting how you consider an attack on American soil (consulate) and the murder of multiple American citizens "so little". I'm a bit surprised you would expose your lack of compassion for slaughtered countrymen in front of everyone...but there you go. So I'll enlighten you. Hillary asked "What difference at this point does it make." but never got an answer. So I'll answer it for you. "It makes a huge difference because you...a civil servant may be responsible for the death of American citizens, the same people you took an oath to protect and serve. And if so, many of the rest of us citizens may wish to see you strung up from the nearest tree not just because you lied and don't seem to care about their lives or families...but because you stand here with the balls to ask why it matters. Well...now you know."

Making a big deal over so little.

a reply to: WeAreAWAKE

When you have actual evidence she was responsible, by all means, trot it out. But we both know you don't have that.

What there is evidence of, however, is a Republican controlled Congress cutting security spending on American Embassies.

So if we're going to start assigning blame, let's blame all who actually share in it.

a reply to: Blazemore2000

Oh...I agree. But you have to remember how this works. We have "leaders" that are in charge of other people and they are also responsible for those people. For example...a General who makes a bad decision is responsible for the outcome. Obama has even said that he is ultimately responsible for many things. In this case, while you can throw Obama in there also...Hillary is responsible. So lets just leave that part there as is.

The biggest problem is the b**** lying along with Obama about the KNOWN truth to the people of America. Our leaders are NOT allowed to lie to us without repercussions in my opinion. They then continued the lies to the families of the dead. They then conspired to have others lie for them (Susan Rice, etc.).

So yes...a leader can make a mistake but character is taking the responsibility that is yours. But only a lying, snake of a worthless, characterless, moral-less creature would then lie to the same people...Americans. THAT is why we are pissed off about Benghazi. Justice nor responsibility was ever met and Clinton exposed who she is. Someone not worthy of any office representing America, let alone the Presidency.

originally posted by: Blazemore2000
a reply to: WeAreAWAKE

When you have actual evidence she was responsible, by all means, trot it out. But we both know you don't have that.

What there is evidence of, however, is a Republican controlled Congress cutting security spending on American Embassies.

So if we're going to start assigning blame, let's blame all who actually share in it.

I could point you to some of the information that would put the lie to your view of the situation but you would either not read it or dismiss it out of hand as partisan lies.

#1. The compound in question was NOT in any way an American Embassy.

#2. It was NOT a Consulate.

#3. It was so secret that the president of Libya didn't know of its existence.

#4. The only way to avoid involving American special ops as a security force was for the SD (and probably the WH, although that may never be known) to sign off on the decision.

#5. Gun towers at the four corners of the compound were not denied by a Republican controlled Congress. That was a SD department decision and the justification was "keeping a low profile & not drawing attention to the compound."

I could go on, but I try to avoid tilting at windmills. Foolish waste of time and effort.

How others view the situation is nothing I can do anything about. It makes a LOT of difference to me.

a reply to: ssenerawa

AT least 1 million people DARE her to try anything.

You know...maybe the younger generation here simply doesn't understand the older generation. As a 51 year old, allow me to explain what my generation considers a leader. Feel free to replace leader with Secretary of State or President.

A leader is ultimately responsible for everyone under them...period.
A leader doesn't lie, cheat, steal or break the rules.
A leader doesn't favor only those who vote for them, a leader looks out for everyone equally.
A leader must lead by example in actions, morals and attitude.
A leader typically takes an oath and follows that oath like a religion.
A leader cares more about the "health" of their people then themselves.
A leader is strong, compassionate and intelligent. Not necessarily through schooling, but in real life situations.
A leader never uses the power lent to them for personal gain.
A leader is a hero. They may have to be the one to jump on a live grenade to save others (figuratively).

And that list can go on for quite a while. Unfortunately, Clinton and Obama are not leaders, heroes nor deserving of respect. The office they hold or held does NOT magically make them a leader. Only their actions and they themselves can do so.

originally posted by: cavtrooper7
a reply to: Annee

I AM and have the skills to discern.

You're a high level politician?

The State Department has already confirmed that the initial search of the 14,900 emails turned over to the SD by the FBI had several hits for "Benghazi".

What those hits are, remains to be seen after Sept 13.

How many does it take other than 1 Benghazi related email to prove that she lied under oath to congress?


My money is on the bet that there are quite a few "Benghazi" related emails in those 14,900... despite the ole Hillster swearing under oath that she turned them all over.

a reply to: RickinVa

Due to residual effects of the brain blood-clot, Hillary probably spelled Benghazi incorrectly a few times too. Or she just said "Libya" when the name of that unimportant town escaped her. (i.e. one of her mental "short-circuits")

a reply to: RickinVa

If these all turn out to be things like "Boy do I wish I could be there but this Benghazi thing has me all tied up"

"Can you believe this Benghazi thing is picking up so much traction?"

And crap like that I'm going to pull my hair out and give up.

originally posted by: Puppylove
a reply to: RickinVa

If these all turn out to be things like "Boy do I wish I could be there but this Benghazi thing has me all tied up"

"Can you believe this Benghazi thing is picking up so much traction?"

And crap like that I'm going to pull my hair out and give up.

Benghazi may or may not pan out.

She does have an Judge in her civil case whom she swore under oath that she had turned over all work related emails... if thousands turn up.... somebody lied. under oath.

At the very best, it looks like there will be thousands of work related emails that should have been preserved under the FOIA.

Seems to me the intentional attempted destruction of thousands of federal records or government property would put most people in front a judge. Quickly.

a reply to: RickinVa

Could also be things like, Header: Re: Benghazi?

Original Sender: "What's this Benghazi thing about?"

Hillary Response: "I can't really talk about that."

And now suddenly Hillary is some great hero for national security.

See, see!!!! They'll say.

a reply to: Puppylove

I do not hold much hope for the Benghazi folks.... I suspect it will be minor things as you say or what is released to the public will be so redacted as to be worthless.


However, every recovered email, document, that is deemed to be work related is going to be a problem. Somebody got some 'splainin to do.

The more work related emails the merrier.....it shows attempted destruction of government records that should have been preserved under FOIA.