Benghazi emails found from Clinton's DELETED cache

originally posted by: jobless1
a reply to: burgerbuddy

not if wiki-leaks has it. Most likely it will be faked new emails from state department set to be released before wikileaks drops the bomb on hillary. Really just now they happen to find more emails? sure!!!!! watch as they make her look like a saint call it a preemptive strike. The point will be to create doubt in the minds of wikileaks readers about how reliable the emails are from wiki leaks compared to the fake state department email as they will be "official" wink wink

It would be funny if Hillary completely misses the mark and outs herself. Also what if that cat burglar most likely a hitman botched the hit on wikileaks founder to collect the money on the Seth Rich murder as he just dropped off the info that links the hit to hillary. If i read the story correctly he got caught and escaped yet no pictures or camera footage great cover story

You do make a very valid observation and prediction to be considered. They have been pushing the wiki leaks as a Russian proganda and lies recently. It will be interesting to see if this is all part of a diffuse those leaks agenda. If so, I would say, it is a wickedly masterful plot of deception! Will hold out until October to see if your prediction is accurate.

You know, at some point you have to feel that TPTB that are trying to shoehorn her into POTUS has to cut their losses with her and all this mess.

I mean everyday is something new and corrupt with her coming to light and if they (TPTB) don't cut the head off the snake, then eventually the sh*t will creep up to their loafers. It's just a matter of time if they don't sacrifice her to squash all this.

The game has gone way awry at this point. I think it's time for a new plan.

"Lie and deny unless they have You on videotape and then continue to lie or place the blame on someone else or medical condition..." √ Check

The only 'positive' out of this is.. Once She is caught/CAUGHT there is NO WAY in HADES that She goes down alone..

"Misery Loves company" This type of misery clamors for company..

Can We also find out where the $6B went that was labelled as "missing" when She was the Head of State? That $6B can go a long way in giving back the middle the $$$ that 'They" have stolen in they're trying to make 'Haves" out of "Have Nots"..

I'll also bet that She didn't pay $900 for the Epi-Pen that Her handlers carry around Her?...

Stay Hydrated...

namaste

Chalk-up a dozen more lies from the Hillary Campaign !!

Nothing will happen to her, she is more then byllet proof at yhos point. She could be caught killing a baby and it stii would mot matter to her supporters. Sorry bout the typos

originally posted by: Czulkangg... Sorry bout the typos

NP! I made this post via mobile myself

This will be great evidence to add to the Perjury
charges that are coming....

Even if the DOJ blocks that, it will be trial by
the American public, whom has had it up to here
with miss psychopathic herself.

I can't help but notice this isn't getting bumped much by the pro-Hillary crowd trying to argue against it.

Wow! So the F.B.I. is more powerful than God?!?!?

Source

Hillary Clinton’s team used more than just a “cloth” to scrub her private server – employing a special program known as BleachBit to delete her private emails and try to prevent their recovery, a senior Republican on the House oversight committee who has read the FBI’s investigative file told Fox News.

“They didn't just push the delete button. They had them deleted where even God can't read them,” Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., said Thursday.

originally posted by: redmage
Wow! So the F.B.I. is more powerful than God?!?!?

Source

Hillary Clinton’s team used more than just a “cloth” to scrub her private server – employing a special program known as BleachBit to delete her private emails and try to prevent their recovery, a senior Republican on the House oversight committee who has read the FBI’s investigative file told Fox News.

“They didn't just push the delete button. They had them deleted where even God can't read them,” Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., said Thursday.

data scrubbing software on a computer that holds classified information isn't a bad thing and them addressing the issue is to fool people. Now if they can show it was only used before Hillary had to hand over the server and not the whole time when she was secretary of state that would be issue. Just because they have a rep before their name and question Hillary isn't a reason to trust them as Hillary is the queen of misdirection. Remember she created the birther movement. This information is lacking details and the crime is insinuated I have seen this backfire before on people and I'm sad to admit even I have been fooled by this method of deception. Its a democrat move that has worked very well in the past but its wearing thin and becoming easy to spot.

a reply to: Tempter

Just a thought....perhaps even an official release of redacted documents, will be useful as a side by side comparison to the unredacted ones in wikileaks' possession. Spacing, formatting and the like, will lend authentication to the unredacted versions.

a reply to: jobless1

"data scrubbing software on a computer that holds classified information isn't a bad thing"

No it isn't when it is stored on a hard drive in a manner certified by NSA.

When it is scrubbed on the unclassified server in your house that holds classified information,,, that is a whole different story.

As of my retirement 4 years ago, the FBI physically destroyed all hard drives with classified information. There was no scrubbing... they degauss them and then physically punch holes though the physical disc itself. Solid State drives weren't very common so I can't tell you the exact procedure for those

When the next Wikileaks bomb drops (hopefully soon, hopefully indictment), I think we need to make that day an ATS celebrated holiday, and each year we laugh, tell Hillary stories, and eat ravioli..

a reply to: burntheships

. When ever you send information out a three way handshake happens. So the computer will ask the receiving computer are you there? The receiving computer will say yes and then the information will be sent. When sending classified information they check the ip address "location" and mac address "computer vin number" of the computer to confirm its being sent to the correct place "traceroute is one of the tools". Her personal server's ip address and mac address wouldn't be on the list unless approved because A: getting a government ip address is different then the c class one you get at home. However she used a blackberry "it would be on a list" because its her work phone and she could of just moved her emails to her personal server. The real issue here is she turned down a secure phone which I'm sure didn't allow her emails to end up on a non government server. So she is guilty of transporting classified information every time regardless of intent which is obvious to any information security professional.

originally posted by: jhn7537
When the next Wikileaks bomb drops (hopefully soon, hopefully indictment), I think we need to make that day an ATS celebrated holiday, and each year we laugh, tell Hillary stories, and eat ravioli..

I'm in that sound great

originally posted by: jobless1
So she is guilty of transporting classified information every time regardless of intent which is obvious to any information security professional.

Yes. In a blatant careless, intentional manner.

Time to face facts folks, Trump did not give birth to Hillary.

But he can do the nation a favor, and keep her from bringing
all of this corruption to the White House, in which case she
would lay waste to the Office, and the country.

GOP - Please move on with the Perjury Charges immediately!

Is Hillary becoming 'too big to fail' ???

originally posted by: Puppylove
I can't help but notice this isn't getting bumped much by the pro-Hillary crowd trying to argue against it.

Did you check who the source of this article is?

Let me know when there's an official state announcement.

a reply to: Annee

I'm sure the Clinton News Network will soon publish the news for you.

Oh, wait, never mind. Gotta report how''s Trump doing bad in polls.

originally posted by: Nikola014
a reply to: Annee

I'm sure the Clinton News Network will soon publish the news for you.

Oh, wait, never mind. Gotta report how''s Trump doing bad in polls.

Would that be an official state announcement?

NO, it wouldn't.

Try again.

TRUMP? Interesting thing I just read: Former Bush administration official Paul Wolfowitz said he is considering voting for Hillary Clinton in an interview in which he lambasted Donald Trump as dangerous.