Social Media Patterns Show Trump Is Looking at a Landslide Victory

a reply to: Sillyolme

Ok but, but......she wasn't even spoze to be sending e-mails like that. Its called "illegal".

And they all were not about "yoga" and what not. Any dumazz knows that.

I should be absolutely amazed that so many of you are still doing the delusional thing... but I guess that's American politics now.

Donald J. Trump will never be President of this country. Most of America sees him for the incompetent psychopath he's become. Sad really, he was once, at least, a semi-interesting TV character.

Come back to reality.

a reply to: rollanotherone

How can 4 or 5 Hillary supporters generate 30 stars on one post? I can only star a post once. If there's a way to give more tell me. If a pro Hillary post got Thirty stars that was done by thirty different people.

originally posted by: Sillyolme

originally posted by: 711117
These numbers you've presented has nothing to do with polls; they show that Trump is a more interesting character and people are interested with what he says, but that interest is not 1 sided in his favour. Someone not interested in American politics would be much more likely to watch a Trump live stream than a Hillary one because people want to hear him say something crazy or diss someone up in real time. People that don't like him follow him on twitter just to see what he's going to say next. All around the world people are tuning in to hear what the man's saying because of all the hype that surrounds him, and this is what those stats say, not that he's ahead in the polls

I say the same about folks who attend his rallys. How many people are just there because it's free local entertainment and they want to see what he will say next.

LOL well apparently the HRC crowds are not even going in for the entertainment! And its otherwise same two 2,4,6 nothing new expected. So they just stay home like they will on election day.

originally posted by: Konduit
a reply to: Astyanax

It's amazing how many people sit in front of a computer but won't take 5 seconds to use a search engine to verify information for themselves.

It's amazing that some people are so incapable of critical thought they'd actually believe that Twitter followers translate likely American voters in a presidential general election.

Nate Silver has Clinton with a 87.8% change of winning.
PollyVote predicts Clinton will garner 52.9% of the popular vote
UVA Center for Politcs has Clinton with 347 electoral votes to Trump's 191

How about the predictive markets? Currently:

PredictWise - Clinton chance of winning 79%
BetFair - Clinton chance of winning 76.6%
PredictIt - Clinton chance of winning 75%

a reply to: Gryphon66

So true. But just the sheep having one last death quiver before becoming total 1984 zombies. They do as they are told, they put the lotion on the skin or else they will get the hose again like Obamas first term. How dare they go for some upstart 1%er!

I can't believe you guys have fallen for a plant......

I read today that the Trump campaign is spending money on monitoring the polling stations to check for corruption... that is a lot of ground to cover, but it would add some context as to why he is not spending money on advertising. Given he is raising unbelievable amounts of money from the people (at a much much faster rate than even Bernie did) and spending very little on ads, it suggests his game plan is very very different to a normal campaign.

Perhaps his internal polls already show him winning easily, so his focus has switched to negating the only way he feels he can now lose? Certainly the optics from the rally's would suggest the people are with him and not Clinton.

a reply to: stosh64

No one is able to give more than one star. There was a glitch years back that gave people multiple stars but that was fixed.
The stars are what they are.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: stosh64

No one is able to give more than one star. There was a glitch years back that gave people multiple stars but that was fixed.
The stars are what they are.

You know you can reload the page don't you guys? New star slot when you do. That needs to be fixed!!

ETA

AND if people who know that do reload and star up certain people as was suggested, then this has been a bit of a SHAM on the truth, whatever it truly is.

originally posted by: SpecialSauce
Hillary supporters don't spend all day posting on the internet about Hillary because they have a life. Unlike Trump supporters.

A life and no job - which is exactly why they are voting for Hillary, to continue that useless, leechy lifestyle.

a reply to: Justoneman

Nope only counts one star per account try it.

a reply to: Konduit

We are not the UK and brexit was about as close as a vote could ever be.
How is that even relevant???
You will point to just about any example that show polls are wrong so that you don't have to face the FACT that Trump is losing and unless he gets control of that big mouth of his he's never going to improve those numbers.

originally posted by: TheKnightofDoom
a reply to: Justoneman

Nope only counts one star per account try it.

Not on my connection. Not on mine. So, who can and can't is the next question. I can prove it if you want post the word test and I will hit it say 10 times?

ETA

I hit a second star on the one at the top of this page just now and I FAILED, ok I am WRONG.

Please go back to your regurlarly scheduled programming. Vote your conscience is a good idea but I caution that you DO know what HRC is capable of doing and we only THINK we might know what the Donald will do.

Public opinion polls are a waste of reporting. We wake up, look at the paper, and are told with such exactitude what our opinions are. It is no more than market research.

a reply to: Justoneman

She has already done it....
She has already won.

You have just not understood the actual situation.
The Clintons made Trump run.

a reply to: Konduit

So what exclusive think tank organization gives you your news? What political insider has your ear?
In other words WHERE DO YOU GET YOUR NEWS THAT MAKES YOUR INFORMATION SO SUPERIOR TO MAIN STREAM MEDIA ? ? ?
Answer that dear. Where are you getting news that you look down your nose at the cable news outlets? Where ???

a reply to: theantediluvian

Facebook users don't even have to be of voting age or American. Anyone who believes that this means something are whistling past the graveyard.

a reply to: Nikola014

Well guess it won't matter to the commies will it?