It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
Any day now ...
Probably tomorrow ...
How many times do some of you have to be absolutely and utterly mistaken about ... well, everything ... before you start trying to modify the echo chamber you're living in?
originally posted by: Gryphon66
Yes, yes ... Hillary will be indicted next week, next month, next year .... the Clinton Foundation too, Bill's dying, Hillary's sick, they're both murdering kingpins operating in the public eye for thirty years, yet, they're incompetent, yada, yada, yada, yada, second verse, yada, yada, third, yada, yada, yad ...
What was it old William SShakespeare said? "a tale told my an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing"?
I'm not holding my breath.
originally posted by: tweetie
a reply to: tiredoflooking
He posts at least a few times daily at his Help Edward Snowden Twitter account, not as much at his main Twitter account.
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: tweetie
a reply to: tiredoflooking
He posts at least a few times daily at his Help Edward Snowden Twitter account, not as much at his main Twitter account.
Thanks for this... is that 100% his account?
originally posted by: tweetie
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: tweetie
a reply to: tiredoflooking
He posts at least a few times daily at his Help Edward Snowden Twitter account, not as much at his main Twitter account.
Thanks for this... is that 100% his account?
As far as I know. I've been watching it for at least a year. It has to be longer than that. His tweets always seem to be his and I've never had reason to question if they may not be.
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: burgerbuddy
Fox just said Snowden made $200k in speaking fees. lol.
I'm sure it will be written up somewhere soon.
Give up the goods, dude!!!
We're all waiting!
The guy has not posted anything for a few days - hopefully he is still alive!
His last post was on August 5th.
Here's where it gets interesting: the NSA is not made of magic. Our rivals do the same thing to us -- and occasionally succeed. Knowing this, NSA's hackers (TAO) are told not to leave their hack tools ("binaries") on the server after an op. But people get lazy. What's new? NSA malware staging servers getting hacked by a rival is not new. A rival publicly demonstrating they have done so is. Why did they do it? No one knows, but I suspect this is more diplomacy than intelligence, related to the escalation around the DNC hack.
Circumstantial evidence and conventional wisdom indicates Russian responsibility. Here's why that is significant: This leak is likely a warning that someone can prove US responsibility for any attacks that originated from this malware server. That could have significant foreign policy consequences. Particularly if any of those operations targeted US allies. Particularly if any of those operations targeted elections. '
Accordingly, this may be an effort to influence the calculus of decision-makers wondering how sharply to respond to the DNC hacks. TL;DR: This leak looks like a somebody sending a message that an escalation in the attribution game could get messy fast. Bonus: When I came forward, NSA would have migrated offensive operations to new servers as a precaution - it's cheap and easy. So? So... The undetected hacker squatting on this NSA server lost access in June 2013. Rare public data point on the positive results of the leak. You're welcome, @NSAGov. Lots of love.
Don't know how to link to Twitter but he said " The Reports of my death are greatly exaggerated" and a photo I don't know who it is.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
Snowden is back with a new array of tweets, which could be damning for the NSA:
"The reports of my death are greatly exaggerated".
@Snowden
In summary:
Here's where it gets interesting: the NSA is not made of magic. Our rivals do the same thing to us -- and occasionally succeed. Knowing this, NSA's hackers (TAO) are told not to leave their hack tools ("binaries") on the server after an op. But people get lazy. What's new? NSA malware staging servers getting hacked by a rival is not new. A rival publicly demonstrating they have done so is. Why did they do it? No one knows, but I suspect this is more diplomacy than intelligence, related to the escalation around the DNC hack.
Circumstantial evidence and conventional wisdom indicates Russian responsibility. Here's why that is significant: This leak is likely a warning that someone can prove US responsibility for any attacks that originated from this malware server. That could have significant foreign policy consequences. Particularly if any of those operations targeted US allies. Particularly if any of those operations targeted elections. '
Accordingly, this may be an effort to influence the calculus of decision-makers wondering how sharply to respond to the DNC hacks. TL;DR: This leak looks like a somebody sending a message that an escalation in the attribution game could get messy fast. Bonus: When I came forward, NSA would have migrated offensive operations to new servers as a precaution - it's cheap and easy. So? So... The undetected hacker squatting on this NSA server lost access in June 2013. Rare public data point on the positive results of the leak. You're welcome, @NSAGov. Lots of love.
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
Snowden is back with a new array of tweets, which could be damning for the NSA:
"The reports of my death are greatly exaggerated".
@Snowden
In summary:
Here's where it gets interesting: the NSA is not made of magic. Our rivals do the same thing to us -- and occasionally succeed. Knowing this, NSA's hackers (TAO) are told not to leave their hack tools ("binaries") on the server after an op. But people get lazy. What's new? NSA malware staging servers getting hacked by a rival is not new. A rival publicly demonstrating they have done so is. Why did they do it? No one knows, but I suspect this is more diplomacy than intelligence, related to the escalation around the DNC hack.
Circumstantial evidence and conventional wisdom indicates Russian responsibility. Here's why that is significant: This leak is likely a warning that someone can prove US responsibility for any attacks that originated from this malware server. That could have significant foreign policy consequences. Particularly if any of those operations targeted US allies. Particularly if any of those operations targeted elections. '
Accordingly, this may be an effort to influence the calculus of decision-makers wondering how sharply to respond to the DNC hacks. TL;DR: This leak looks like a somebody sending a message that an escalation in the attribution game could get messy fast. Bonus: When I came forward, NSA would have migrated offensive operations to new servers as a precaution - it's cheap and easy. So? So... The undetected hacker squatting on this NSA server lost access in June 2013. Rare public data point on the positive results of the leak. You're welcome, @NSAGov. Lots of love.
Good news - now hopefully he has something more to share
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
Snowden is back with a new array of tweets, which could be damning for the NSA:
"The reports of my death are greatly exaggerated".
@Snowden
In summary:
Here's where it gets interesting: the NSA is not made of magic. Our rivals do the same thing to us -- and occasionally succeed. Knowing this, NSA's hackers (TAO) are told not to leave their hack tools ("binaries") on the server after an op. But people get lazy. What's new? NSA malware staging servers getting hacked by a rival is not new. A rival publicly demonstrating they have done so is. Why did they do it? No one knows, but I suspect this is more diplomacy than intelligence, related to the escalation around the DNC hack.
Circumstantial evidence and conventional wisdom indicates Russian responsibility. Here's why that is significant: This leak is likely a warning that someone can prove US responsibility for any attacks that originated from this malware server. That could have significant foreign policy consequences. Particularly if any of those operations targeted US allies. Particularly if any of those operations targeted elections. '
Accordingly, this may be an effort to influence the calculus of decision-makers wondering how sharply to respond to the DNC hacks. TL;DR: This leak looks like a somebody sending a message that an escalation in the attribution game could get messy fast. Bonus: When I came forward, NSA would have migrated offensive operations to new servers as a precaution - it's cheap and easy. So? So... The undetected hacker squatting on this NSA server lost access in June 2013. Rare public data point on the positive results of the leak. You're welcome, @NSAGov. Lots of love.
****************************************************************************************************************************************************** ************************
This is HUGE, unless I completely misunderstand. I'll start a new thread in the morning if you don't .... I'm beginning to think between Assange, Snowden and a few others, there's a concerted effort to take down the MSM 'choices' for POTUS. Certainly a huge monkeywrench.
edit on 18-8-2016 by SentientCentenarian because:edit on 18-8-2016 by SentientCentenarian because: fixitextra DIV