Yes, boys, you CAN have sex slaves: Outrage as British Muslim cleric at mosque where Cardiff jihadis

originally posted by: grainofsand
a reply to: Hazardous1408

Nope, I'll nit pick as much as you....balance and all that.

I didn't nitpick I misspoke but, whatever, dude.
Carry on and keep calm.

a reply to: Hazardous1408

Okay so again, are you saying there are no sex slaves in the Islamic communities of the UK then?
How do you know that exactly?

So then bomb more Syrians, right?

NATO is the evil you seek.

a reply to: Hazardous1408

I misread what you'd typed.

Please carry on

originally posted by: grainofsand
a reply to: intrptr

Dude, the same mosque produced 3 jihadis who went to Syria, the story is hardly surprising.
Of course the place is suspected of being less than friendly to non Muslims, not the best track record in a relatively small city with a small minority Muslim population.

Then bomb that mosque, too. After all its a pit of evil, right?

Abstain from sex, except with the captives whom your right hand possesses - for, in their case, you are free from blame.
- Q 23:1

Guard your chastity, except with the captives whom your right hand possesses - for then you are not to be blamed.
- Q 70:22

These issues mentioned in the article will persist as long as Muslim clerics and their followers take the dark and old fashioned side of Quran literally. It can be religion of peace but only after a major reform of the religion, state and mindset of some of the followers.

a reply to: Christosterone

Let me ask you an aside...how can you actually defend a man who tells teenage boys that they have God given dominion over women and can enslave them for their own barbaric, Stone Age sexual desires??
Im genuinely curious....are you an acolyte of Mohammed the lover of Aisha(6-7 year old wife depending on your interpretation of the hadiths)

I seem to remember the first thing I said was he is an extremist imbecile.
I have no time for such people.

So before we get into your diatribe of off topic questions maybe quote where I defended him?

originally posted by: intrptr

So then bomb more Syrians, right?

NATO is the evil you seek.

Russia is doing a good job bombing Syrians as well.

a reply to: Gin

Reform? That might take some time, but, nothing a few nukes can't resolve...

jk.

originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Christosterone

The revelations come amid heightened fears over the Islamist terror threat in the UK in the wake of the bloody attacks in France.

The terror propaganda juggernaut is rolling along nicely.

Have you guys in the EU appropriated billions more for 'defence' yet?

Propaganda .. so this cleric did not say this? Propaganda insinuates you are being misled.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Christosterone

I think its only really the political establishment that's allowed to have "Sex slaves" in the U.K.

You can find plenty more in the 'red light' district, too.

They call them prostitutes.

a reply to: intrptr

Oh you really are pathetic trying to invent added value to my words now.
Who said anything about bombing that mosque?

a reply to: grainofsand

Context matey.

When I said we don't have sex slaves on the UK I was talking lawfully like Saudi Arabia or some parts of Africa.

Of course there must be Muslims involved in he white slavery business in the UK..

My point was we don't allow it if caught, so this extremist views are not going to bring about a change in the law.
I just anticipated that at some point on his thread sharia law would be mentioned so o thought I'd nip that silly idea in the bud.

a reply to: Hazardous1408

Fun, I'll play...

I could have asked "how can you defend [the right] of this man [to be free from incarceration] who tells teenage boys that they have God given dominion over women and can enslave them for their own barbaric, Stone Age sexual desires??"

There, is that better?
Feel free not to answer....again

-Chris

a reply to: Gin

Islam can never be a religion if peace, no matter of reforms or even if the billion or so worshiper enter the 21st century.

when a religion governs politics and societal issues, its a bad mix, and self defeating. its a fallacy beyond logic.

a reply to: awareness10

Well it took some time for Christianity to drop it's bible humping and bloodthirst, but of course it's not certain that Islam will follow this same path, maybe. Dropping nukes would be a drastic measure but would provide results truly much faster.

Concerns with Islam: Sexual Slavery in Islam

through history many religions believe in the rights of conqueror's religions to own slaves.

We all know that is human rights in modern days to address this despicable acts against women.

But when you have an active religion promoting this, you know that this religions are still wagging war against humanity and human rights and have no desired to stop any time soon as long as their own religious laws approve the practices.

Kind of hard to enforce in countries that practice freedom for their all their citizens like western nations.

Only if the women are willing to become slaves or be forced to become slave this practice could be enforced.

I doubt it.

wikiislam.net...:_Sexual_Slavery_in_Islam

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Propaganda .. so this cleric did not say this?

I doubt it. Or its out of context, whatever. Don't need any proof anyway, its our daily 'two minutes hate'. Judging by all the stars on the OP, I expect the bombing to step up, regardless.

Simple Definition of juggernaut:

something (such as a force, campaign, or movement) that is extremely large and powerful and cannot be stopped

originally posted by: Christosterone
a reply to: Hazardous1408

Fun, I'll play...

I could have asked "how can you defend [the right] of this man [to be free from incarceration] who tells teenage boys that they have God given dominion over women and can enslave them for their own barbaric, Stone Age sexual desires??"

There, is that better?
Feel free not to answer....again

-Chris

That is better.
It's not a loaded question for I believe it's an honest ask.


I'm defending his right to free speech. Not him as a person or his values. As I would an evangelical Christian, a Hasidic Jew, a Shivaite Hindu or a die hard atheist.

If he does something illegal send him to Guantanamo for all I care.

Until then I side with free speech.


That a good enough answer for you?

a reply to: Hazardous1408

The OP wasn't talking about legal sex slavery, deflect much?

If that imam actually said those things then legal or otherwise it saddens me that such scum is indoctrinating our young people.