It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
Let's compare
The "n" does appear to be quite different, as does the "O" to my eye.
But you are correct, MME, the thread is regarding the seal; which you have demonstrated quite clearly to me, that what is put forth as accepted and allegedly confirmed by other documents with similar characteristics existence; none of which have been verified by the recognized legal authority who produced said documents.
Aforementioned seal not matching the seal produced by the recognized authority to produce said seal:
Seal on 'authenticated' factcheck.org birth certificate:
Seal produced by the Hawaii Department of Health:
Clear difference is clear.
originally posted by: hellobruce
This thread is so funny, after 8 years as POTUS, being elected twice, 200+ failed court cases
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: hellobruce
This thread is so funny, after 8 years as POTUS, being elected twice, 200+ failed court cases
All I see here is 200 strawman attacks. 200 strawman attacks that have absolutely nothing to do with this thread, and 200 times of being OFF-TOPIC.
Please stay ON TOPIC or author your own thread.
originally posted by: hellobruce
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: hellobruce
This thread is so funny, after 8 years as POTUS, being elected twice, 200+ failed court cases
All I see here is 200 strawman attacks. 200 strawman attacks that have absolutely nothing to do with this thread, and 200 times of being OFF-TOPIC.
Please stay ON TOPIC or author your own thread.
Pointing out the crap you are pushing has gone to court, and been rejected by the courts is on TOPIC.... .
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
No, it hasn't.
his Decision is entirely based on the law, as well as the evidence and legal arguments presented at the hearing.....
Hawaiian birth certificate that is a computer-generated forgery,......
The Court finds the testimony of the witnesses, as well as the exhibits tendered, to be of little, if any, probative value, and thus wholly insufficient to support Plaintiffs' allegations.....3
or example, two of Plaintiffs' witnesses testified that Mr. Obama's birth certificate was forged, ...........
the Court finds that none of the written submissions tendered by Plaintiffs have probative value. Given the unsatisfactory evidence presented by the Plaintiffs, the Court concludes that Plaintiffs' claims are not persuasive. 5
originally posted by: SudoNim
a reply to: MotherMayEye
Then why do you keep responding?
Are you just trying to get his posts removed now because they show that your work has been tried tested and failed in court over and over?
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
And, no, "my work" it hasn't been tested in court.
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: DeadFoot
NONE of those stamps can be authenticated, AND none are a match for Onaka's signature. None of them.
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: DeadFoot
I know, because I asked their owners if they would allow the Hawaii Department of Health to authenticate them for me. They refused.
originally posted by: DeadFoot
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: DeadFoot
I know, because I asked their owners if they would allow the Hawaii Department of Health to authenticate them for me. They refused.
Oh did you contact them?
Are you sure about that?
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: DeadFoot
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: DeadFoot
I know, because I asked their owners if they would allow the Hawaii Department of Health to authenticate them for me. They refused.
Oh did you contact them?
Are you sure about that?
I contacted those I had contact info for. I am sure about that.
But, please, answer the question. What is it about these 'birthers' you find so credible? The white supremacist guy? What did you find credible about him?