Welcome One and All to The 2016 Democratic National Convention

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: UKTruth

I do not think it's a hostile environment. The messages are well received, but perhaps you were expecting the DNC attendees to be as riled-up and foaming at the mouth as we witnessed at the RNC.

There's a difference in the people.

Oh come on - its been an awful day 1 so far. The nominee is getting booed every time her name is mentioned and people are not even listening to the speakers at times.

Awful is a matter of opinion. It did not start well, but it seems to be smooth at this point.

Again, there is a difference in the people. The Right has a specific brand of propaganda that keeps their listeners engaged and enraged. The RNC was a good example of that.

The DNC is slightly boring in their approach. They could learn a thing or two about propaganda.

The democrats could learn a thing or two about propaganda? That's like saying Muhammed Ali could learn a thing or two about boxing.

a reply to: Annee

I'm glad they decided to remain overwhelmingly positive to in order to highlight the difference between the parties.

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: UKTruth

I do not think it's a hostile environment. The messages are well received, but perhaps you were expecting the DNC attendees to be as riled-up and foaming at the mouth as we witnessed at the RNC.

There's a difference in the people.

Oh come on - its been an awful day 1 so far. The nominee is getting booed every time her name is mentioned and people are not even listening to the speakers at times.

Awful is a matter of opinion. It did not start well, but it seems to be smooth at this point.

Again, there is a difference in the people. The Right has a specific brand of propaganda that keeps their listeners engaged and enraged. The RNC was a good example of that.

The DNC is slightly boring in their approach. They could learn a thing or two about propaganda.

The democrats could learn a thing or two about propaganda? That's like saying Muhammed Ali could learn a thing or two about boxing.

If their propaganda was any good, the crowd would be more engaged and louder, correct? Have you not said yourself that the crowd seems a bit indifferent at times?

Compare that to the RNC that hung on every word about Hillary, Benghazi, etc. The same terms and words over and over.

Easy to tell who's propaganda works better.

That people is the biggest FARCE of the Democratic Convention.

They are CELEBRATING RACISM, and SEXISM.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: UKTruth

I do not think it's a hostile environment. The messages are well received, but perhaps you were expecting the DNC attendees to be as riled-up and foaming at the mouth as we witnessed at the RNC.

There's a difference in the people.

Yeah, I'm not seeing any issues with this convention.

Different thinking, different style.

I think some posters must be watching something different then I am

I would have nixed the "Love Trump Hate" signs, (don't know whose idea that was), and I would have substituted those anti-Trump videos, mocking him, with heart warming mini documentaries of people doing good things, like Flint Michigan water drives, etc., bringing it back to middle class issues, instead of Trump oligarchy issues.

originally posted by: neo96
That people is the biggest FARCE of the Democratic Convention.

They are CELEBRATING RACISM, and SEXISM.

No, they are not.

I know what they are trying to do with the LOVE TRUMPS HATE signs but Trump's name stands out more to me on the signs. Almost comes across as an endorsement.

originally posted by: neo96
That people is the biggest FARCE of the Democratic Convention.

They are CELEBRATING RACISM, and SEXISM.

Exactly - rampant racism and sexism too.

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Annee

I'm glad they decided to remain overwhelmingly positive to in order to highlight the difference between the parties.

It is showing the difference in parties.

Not everything needs to be Rah! Rah! Flag Waving.

This is really more like everyday people and everyday life.

a reply to: introvert

Yeah they ARE.

PA. The birth of this nation.

A time when neither women or 'blacks' had ANY RIGHTS.

a reply to: Khaleesi

I know, really dumb.

a reply to: windword

I still do not understand the "Love Trump Hate" signs. What is that supposed to mean anyway?
And that seems to be the only signs they have.
Is that their slogan?
Where are the Hillary signs?

At least at the RNC they had positive "Make America Great", "Make America.. all kinds of other things" and "Trump" signs.

LOL

John Podesta.

Another fumble flop.

"Hillary will take on powerful special interests and a rigged system"

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: introvert

Yeah they ARE.

PA. The birth of this nation.

A time when neither women or 'blacks' any ANY RIGHTS.

It appears the Democrats are the ones talking about equal rights and application of the laws for women and minorites...yet they are being called racist and sexist for it.

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: neo96

Xenophobe means fear of outsiders.

And the DNC said Sanders was an outsider.

a reply to: BlueAjah

I think it's supposed to relay "Love the hate away", or make the hate work against Trump by making him look bad. But all anyone sees is "TRUMP!"

SO DUMB! Worse than Melania's RickRoll!

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: introvert

Yeah they ARE.

PA. The birth of this nation.

A time when neither women or 'blacks' any ANY RIGHTS.

It appears the Democrats are the ones talking about equal rights and application of the laws for women and minorites...yet they are being called racist and sexist for it.

IS that so ?

Meet the new 3/5 folks rich people, and gun owners.

a reply to: UKTruth
Doggie style?