It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: SonofaSkunk
Very cool! See what I did there?
originally posted by: Orionx2
Seems odd. I have done a lot of R&D with Peltier coolers. We had a hot compenent that needed cooled. We put the cool side of the Peltier cooler on the hot part and the warm side got cooled by fans. The problem I see is the hot part of the cooler was always warmer than the part we were cooling. I don't see how this would lower IR detection...
Possibly the heat is radiated/dissipated over a larger surface area. Interesting post.
originally posted by: darksidius
Lower than subsonic , invisible but a century to go on the theater great idea , the ennemy will be going before you arrive, soon the same speed of a B-24 liberator .
The team... added a small amount of graphene to strontium titanium oxide. The resulting composite was able to convert heat that would otherwise be wasted into an electric current over a broad temperature range, beginning at room temperature. Previously, thermoelectric materials only functioned at extremely high temperatures around 700 degrees Celsius.
originally posted by: TEOTWAWKIAIFF
a reply to: StargateSG7
The team... added a small amount of graphene to strontium titanium oxide. The resulting composite was able to convert heat that would otherwise be wasted into an electric current over a broad temperature range, beginning at room temperature. Previously, thermoelectric materials only functioned at extremely high temperatures around 700 degrees Celsius.
Gas2.org, Aug. 2015 - Graphene Converts Heat Into Electricity.
Why not convert "waste" heat to electricity? The material is not bulky. It has been known for a while. Even if you store it in batteries there is less heat to deal with.
Just a thought. Nice topic!
S+F
originally posted by: darksidius
a reply to: StargateSG7
I stay on my opinion , it's a mistake to go slow , now with the mobile launcher you need speed to go on the theater, if your bomber take hours after hours after hours to come the objectif have move since a lot , do you think the ennemy will stay at the same place ten hours after firing ? Don't you think the bomber need dash to escape the futur 5th gen ennemy squadron ?
originally posted by: SonofaSkunk
Very cool! See what I did there?
originally posted by: StargateSG7
originally posted by: Orionx2
Seems odd. I have done a lot of R&D with Peltier coolers. We had a hot compenent that needed cooled. We put the cool side of the Peltier cooler on the hot part and the warm side got cooled by fans. The problem I see is the hot part of the cooler was always warmer than the part we were cooling. I don't see how this would lower IR detection...
Possibly the heat is radiated/dissipated over a larger surface area. Interesting post.
---
With Peltier effects cooling you need a final heat sink
that absorbs all the sucked-out thermal energy.
I would look at a Stirling Engine (i.e. Cryo-Cooler)
as a good start as to how this system MIGHT work
on a practical sense.
See Link:
en.wikipedia.org...
if you look at modern computer with high-performance graphics cards,
SOME of them use Peltier effect cooling which is why the heat sink
is so H-U-G-E because that heat from the GPU/RAM has to be moved
QUICKLY to the opposite end of the cooling circuit and then RADIATED
into another heat-absorbsing material or output via convection using
a fan mechanism.
I suggest to you that the thermal absorbing ceramic plates or blocks
ONLY have to work for the duration of the longest specified mission
and after that a "Heat Flush/Heat Dump" can take place back at the
original base of operations.
originally posted by: Orionx2
originally posted by: StargateSG7
originally posted by: Orionx2
Seems odd. I have done a lot of R&D with Peltier coolers. We had a hot compenent that needed cooled. We put the cool side of the Peltier cooler on the hot part and the warm side got cooled by fans. The problem I see is the hot part of the cooler was always warmer than the part we were cooling. I don't see how this would lower IR detection...
Possibly the heat is radiated/dissipated over a larger surface area. Interesting post.
---
With Peltier effects cooling you need a final heat sink
that absorbs all the sucked-out thermal energy.
I would look at a Stirling Engine (i.e. Cryo-Cooler)
as a good start as to how this system MIGHT work
on a practical sense.
See Link:
en.wikipedia.org...
if you look at modern computer with high-performance graphics cards,
SOME of them use Peltier effect cooling which is why the heat sink
is so H-U-G-E because that heat from the GPU/RAM has to be moved
QUICKLY to the opposite end of the cooling circuit and then RADIATED
into another heat-absorbsing material or output via convection using
a fan mechanism.
I suggest to you that the thermal absorbing ceramic plates or blocks
ONLY have to work for the duration of the longest specified mission
and after that a "Heat Flush/Heat Dump" can take place back at the
original base of operations.
The problem is absorbing it keeps the heat in the plane, in order for IR not to detect it it needs to be dissipated/ Removed from the plane. Taking the heat from the exhaust and moving it to another part of the plane is pointless as the IR will detect it wherever it is on the plane.
What could work though is using the plane itself as the heat sink and using the airflow to dissipate the heat. The larger the surface area the heat transfer to that has airflow the more heat can be removed and the smaller the heat signature.
Pretty impressive technology if it actually exists.
originally posted by: StargateSG7
originally posted by: SonofaSkunk
Very cool! See what I did there?
---
Like I said earlier, The Skunkies have NOTHING in this area that I could see....
And my sources are even DEEPER within LMCO than my
Northrup/BAE/Raytheon/L3/Teledyne/Bell/Daimler/Euro, etc sources....
So if you have something to share about LMCO and Boeing, I'm all ears!
ESPECIALLY if your dad worked on the LMCO USAF spacestation,
SSTO spaceplane, SCRAMJET/pumpkin seed, Cavity Resonator Jetting system, etc......
originally posted by: darksidius
a reply to: StargateSG7
I stay on my opinion , it's a mistake to go slow , now with the mobile launcher you need speed to go on the theater, if your bomber take hours after hours after hours to come the objectif have move since a lot , do you think the ennemy will stay at the same place ten hours after firing ? Don't you think the bomber need dash to escape the futur 5th gen ennemy squadron ?