It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: avgguy
a reply to: Krazysh0t
That was un-holstered?
So having an unholstered gun is a criminal offense warranting being shot to death then?
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: In4ormant
I'm not lumping all police into anything. I'm saying that we should keep an eye on them because I pay their paychecks. That will go a long way to rooting out the bad police. What is it that the government always says to us? If you aren't doing anything wrong then you won't have anything to worry about.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: UKTruth
I have many answers to your questions and quite a few of them circle back around to the police, prosecuting attorneys, a prison system that encourages recidivism instead of rehabilitation, and the war on drugs.
originally posted by: supremecommander
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
Community oversight is code for taking over local government.
We already have community oversight, it is called local elections. They want to bum rush city hall and create their own militant city states.
That is what this whole get rid of the cops charade is all about.
If the police are keeping law and order within a community, the community should have every right to know what the police are doing and have a say in how police handle things.
They WORK for the community. They should have to answer to every single resident in that community when an issue arises pertaining to misconduct.
They are not gods.
originally posted by: In4ormant
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: In4ormant
I'm not lumping all police into anything. I'm saying that we should keep an eye on them because I pay their paychecks. That will go a long way to rooting out the bad police. What is it that the government always says to us? If you aren't doing anything wrong then you won't have anything to worry about.
900k LEO's gonna wear live feed cameras to try and curb the .001% of them that are bad? You want almost a million cameras policing the US people?
I do believe you are residing in the wrong country.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: In4ormant
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: In4ormant
I'm not lumping all police into anything. I'm saying that we should keep an eye on them because I pay their paychecks. That will go a long way to rooting out the bad police. What is it that the government always says to us? If you aren't doing anything wrong then you won't have anything to worry about.
900k LEO's gonna wear live feed cameras to try and curb the .001% of them that are bad? You want almost a million cameras policing the US people?
I do believe you are residing in the wrong country.
Sure. What's wrong with that?
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: UKTruth
I have many answers to your questions and quite a few of them circle back around to the police, prosecuting attorneys, a prison system that encourages recidivism instead of rehabilitation, and the war on drugs.
Your still talking about the downstream handling of a much bigger issue though.
Give a young kid in an inner city (white or black or anything else) the same opportunities as a rich kid in the suburbs - education and job prospects. Invest in infrastructure and community facilities. Proactively get into inner cities and help the community transform itself. There is so much potential that goes to waste because people don't have a path, don't have a mentor and don't have hope. When that happens, crime follows.
I would really like to see BLM talking about these issues, not about police.
originally posted by: Picklesneeze
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Absolutely-white/black/other-armed (knife/gun/etc,)robbers should be killed on the spot.
Edit to add looters to that list.
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: In4ormant
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: In4ormant
I'm not lumping all police into anything. I'm saying that we should keep an eye on them because I pay their paychecks. That will go a long way to rooting out the bad police. What is it that the government always says to us? If you aren't doing anything wrong then you won't have anything to worry about.
900k LEO's gonna wear live feed cameras to try and curb the .001% of them that are bad? You want almost a million cameras policing the US people?
I do believe you are residing in the wrong country.
Sure. What's wrong with that?
I guess it would be quite an expensive thing to do to solve a non issue.
Key findings:
Officers who did not wear body cameras conducted more “stop-and-frisks” and made more arrests than officers who wore the video cameras. Officers who did not wear cameras performed 9.8% more stop-and-frisks and made 6.9% more arrests.
Officers assigned to wear cameras issued 23.1% more citations for ordinance violations than those who did not wear cameras.
Officers with body cameras initiated 13.5% more interactions with citizens than those who did not wear them.
Officers wearing cameras were 25.2% more likely to perceive the devices as being helpful during their interactions with the public.
The cameras did not have a significant impact on whether or not officers gave verbal warnings to citizens.
The study indicates that police officers were more cautious and risk averse when wearing body cameras. The authors suggest that the reason that camera-wearing officers may have made fewer arrests and conducted fewer stop-and-frisks was because they thought more carefully about criminal policy and procedures. With video evidence, there is the potential for greater scrutiny by supervisors or members of the public. The researchers note that a possible reason why officers with cameras wrote more citations was because they were worried they might be reprimanded for not issuing tickets when video evidence showed that a citizen had violated an ordinance or traffic law. Ready and Young’s work offers insights that they think will be useful to law enforcement agencies as they decide whether to use this technology. “Police executives may support new technology that brings greater accountability and less civil liability, but line officers focus on how it may limit their use of discretion in the field,” the authors state. “Empirical support showing that OVCs [On-officer Video Cameras] can help departments achieve their goals will reduce the time needed for this technology to gain legitimacy. Our findings represent a preliminary step in that direction.”
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: UKTruth
I have many answers to your questions and quite a few of them circle back around to the police, prosecuting attorneys, a prison system that encourages recidivism instead of rehabilitation, and the war on drugs.
Your still talking about the downstream handling of a much bigger issue though.
Give a young kid in an inner city (white or black or anything else) the same opportunities as a rich kid in the suburbs - education and job prospects. Invest in infrastructure and community facilities. Proactively get into inner cities and help the community transform itself. There is so much potential that goes to waste because people don't have a path, don't have a mentor and don't have hope. When that happens, crime follows.
I would really like to see BLM talking about these issues, not about police.
People do talk about these things, but usually there is push back from the right saying they don't want to waste their tax money on social programs.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: In4ormant
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: In4ormant
I'm not lumping all police into anything. I'm saying that we should keep an eye on them because I pay their paychecks. That will go a long way to rooting out the bad police. What is it that the government always says to us? If you aren't doing anything wrong then you won't have anything to worry about.
900k LEO's gonna wear live feed cameras to try and curb the .001% of them that are bad? You want almost a million cameras policing the US people?
I do believe you are residing in the wrong country.
Sure. What's wrong with that?