Brilliant Light Power Demonstration, June 28th 2016

a reply to: AnarchoCapitalist

LOL you're repeating yourself. We've already debunked this nonsense in this very thread.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

a reply to: GetHyped

Maybe they think that if they repeat it someone will believe it.

I still can't get over how much money BLP have been given.

Best.
Fraud.
Ever.

a reply to: TerryDon79

I don't see any debunking.

originally posted by: AnarchoCapitalist
a reply to: TerryDon79

I don't see any debunking.

Of course you don't. You don't see anything apart from how "great" BLP is.

The rest of us can see how, for a quarter of a century and many millions of dollars, BLP has pulled off a major fraud.

originally posted by: TerryDon79

Of course you don't. You don't see anything apart from how "great" BLP is.

The rest of us can see how, for a quarter of a century and many millions of dollars, BLP has pulled off a major fraud.

I don't think you're capable of reading the scientific reports I linked.

originally posted by: AnarchoCapitalist

originally posted by: TerryDon79

Of course you don't. You don't see anything apart from how "great" BLP is.

The rest of us can see how, for a quarter of a century and many millions of dollars, BLP has pulled off a major fraud.

I don't think you're capable of reading the scientific reports I linked.

You mean the same fakes you posted before?

Where are the reports from the universities? Oh, wait. They don't exist.

a reply to: AnarchoCapitalist

they are not scientific reports - further - they are not independant

has it never occured to you to wonder why :

no documentation of mills claims exists outside his own website ?

originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: AnarchoCapitalist

they are not scientific reports - further - they are not independant

has it never occured to you to wonder why :

no documentation of mills claims exists outside his own website ?

They are independent evaluators who stand to lose their academic reputations if they are caught lying or performing invalid experiments. All of them have PhDs and all of them are active university professors.

originally posted by: AnarchoCapitalist

originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: AnarchoCapitalist

they are not scientific reports - further - they are not independant

has it never occured to you to wonder why :

no documentation of mills claims exists outside his own website ?

They are independent evaluators who stand to lose their academic reputations if they are caught lying or performing invalid experiments. All of them have PhDs and all of them are active university professors.

You forgot to add that it's all fake. Nothing can be corroborated outside of their own site.

a reply to: AnarchoCapitalist

Dr. Kandalam Ramanujachary
www.rowan.edu...

Dr. Peter Mark Jansson
www.bucknell.edu...

Dr. Randy Booker
physics.unca.edu...

Dr. Nick G Glumac
mechanical.illinois.edu...


There are several more reports from several more investigators that I could link, but those four are probably the most comprehensive of the bunch.

a reply to: AnarchoCapitalist

Those aren't reports. They're bios lol.

No wonder you believe BLP. You can't even tell the difference between a report and a bio lol.

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: AnarchoCapitalist

Those aren't reports. They're bios lol.

No wonder you believe BLP. You can't even tell the difference between a report and a bio lol.

They wrote the reports I linked.

Dr. Kandalam Ramanujachary
www.rowan.edu...
Rowan University’s report

Dr. Peter Mark Jansson
www.bucknell.edu...
Rowan University’s report II

Dr. Randy Booker
physics.unca.edu...
UNC Asheville’s report

Dr. Nick G Glumac
mechanical.illinois.edu...
University of Illinois report

originally posted by: AnarchoCapitalist

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: AnarchoCapitalist

Those aren't reports. They're bios lol.

No wonder you believe BLP. You can't even tell the difference between a report and a bio lol.

They wrote the reports I linked.

According to the BLP site. That's called uncorroborated.

You really can't see how much of a fraud this is?

Quarter of a century and many tens of million dollars for a couple of flashing lights on YouTube and some fake reports lol.

a reply to: TerryDon79

So email them.

originally posted by: AnarchoCapitalist
a reply to: TerryDon79

So email them.

And that would make it less fake?

I don't think so lol.

There is absolutely no evidence that this thing works. After a quarter of a century and many tens of millions of dollars, you would have thought they would have had more than a flashing light on YouTube lol.

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: AnarchoCapitalist
a reply to: TerryDon79

So email them.

And that would make it less fake?

I don't think so lol.

It's obviously not fake, so it wouldn't make it any "less fake" - however, it would undermine your illogical and irrational argument.

a reply to: AnarchoCapitalist

Of course it's fake. All their "proof" is flashing lights on YouTube and "reports" on their own site.

Any moron can set up a fake report and flashy lights on YouTube.

a reply to: TerryDon79

so email the professors and ask them if their reports and the tests are fake.

originally posted by: AnarchoCapitalist
a reply to: TerryDon79

so email the professors and ask them if their reports and the tests are fake.

Why would I waste my time emailing people who are on BLPs payroll?

It would be like me emailing Corey Goode and asking if he was faking it lol.

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: AnarchoCapitalist
a reply to: TerryDon79

so email the professors and ask them if their reports and the tests are fake.

Why would I waste my time emailing people who are on BLPs payroll?

It would be like me emailing Corey Goode and asking if he was faking it lol.

That's how science is done. You pay people to perform research and validation testing.

Do you know who Underwriters Laboratories is and what they do?

You are aware that companies have to pay UL to get UL certified, right?

Do you believe that UL certification is useless because companies had to pay a third party to test their equipment?