Brilliant Light Power Demonstration, June 28th 2016

a reply to: AnarchoCapitalist

All Mills has done is con people out of money with 25 years of "it'll be ready soon!"

And you have to bring in ITER. Something that doesn't have a thing to do with what Mills is pretending to do.

At least you've shown your true colours. How much have you invested in it? Must be a lot to keep pushing it the way you have. But don't worry! It'll be ready soon LOL.

originally posted by: AnarchoCapitalist
Compared to the ITER, MIlls progress has been light years faster at a micro-fraction of the cost.

Mills reached over-unity in 2007, and went from concept to functional reactor within 9 years. All he has left to do is assemble the generator.

en.wikipedia.org...

ITER began in 1985...Conceptual and engineering design phases carried out under the auspices of the IAEA led to an acceptable, detailed design in 2001, underpinned by US$650 million worth of research and development by the "ITER Parties" to establish its practical feasibility.

In 2013, the project had run into many delays and budget overruns. The facility is not expected to begin operations at the schedule initially anticipated... Construction of the ITER Tokamak complex started in 2013 and the building costs are now over US$14 billion as of June 2015.

?? what does ITER have to do with this discussion.

"Mills isnt a fraud because ITER is taking a long time"

Ive asked you many many polite questions which you keep avoiding and/or refuse to answer. Not sure why you are so defensive if yo uare so sure Mills is on the right track.

originally posted by: paradoxious
Catalysts facilitate reactions without being consumed by the reaction themselves.

They facilitate CHEMICAL reactions. They don't do anything to cause the sorts of transitions that BLP states. But people have heard the word 'catalyst' so it's a good con.

a reply to: AnarchoCapitalist

The generator was creating so much power that it was blowing holes through inch thick tungsten electrodes

there is no actuall evidence of this claim occuring in any of mills videos

but hey - i will settle for just still images of these alledged "inch thick tungsten electrodes" before and after

Yeah, it would be nice if the whole Hydrino thing had any 3rd party confirmation both theoretically and experimentally, of-course Mills has published papers, and people have made responses to those papers, in terms of how you theoretically create hydrinos, it all sounds very much bogus or unsubstantiated as to why there is a need for the said states and why we don't see spontaneous creation of them in air.

As for blowing holes in electrodes... Yeah, you know, pass a few kA across an arc gap between electrodes made from any material and you will get pitting... it isn't magic

originally posted by: paradoxious
Surprised no one asked about:
"They were also having problems maintaining an even detonation of the catalyst."

Why would one detonate the catalyst? Catalysts facilitate reactions without being consumed by the reaction themselves.

I agree unless your creating a thermite reaction. Meaning thos is nothing more than a chemical reaction and that's why they can't sustain it. And also why they cant show scientists what they are doing othet than a light show.Create a thermite reaction in a core and we'll you will melt tungsten. You also get a nice blinding flash and all it takes is iron and aluminum Fe2O3 (s) + 2 Al (s) → Al2O3 (s) + 2 Fe (s). Want to bet they use iron oxide powder and aluminum any takers???

originally posted by: ErosA433
Yeah, it would be nice if the whole Hydrino thing had any 3rd party confirmation both theoretically and experimentally...

Why, you see it all around you!

There were endless hydrinos created a few minutes after the big bang.

What IS a hydrogen atom with an electron energy state of whatever they claim, 0? -1?

It's a neutron, of course. The abnormal energy state is metastatic - if you leave one alone, isolated, it'll revert to its true nature.

(we really need a tongue-in-cheek emoticon)

Are we on the cold fusion stuff again?
Results to date havent been conclusive, but a lot of interesting side effects have been observed.

Iter is a hot fusion attempt, albeit a clumsy one. A bit like designing & building a Ferrari engine to run a food mixer, they overcomplicated all of it. Looking at the plans i would say that 80% of the tech in there is not needed.
And i told them that a few years ago, and they were interested in my reasoning but would not spend any time on it because of budget restrictions. That's funny, because they were too busy building their 10 trillion dollar machine to pay any attention to my 3000 dollar one.
LMAO

Pretty crazy update from BLP today.

They refactored the Sun Cell to use dual liquid silver metal injectors for the electrodes, which solved the problem of the reaction being so strong that it was blowing holes through solid tungsten electrodes in just a few seconds.

What's pretty crazy is they are reporting that they can actually shut the power off to the electrodes and the EM pump; yet the reaction will continue in a self-sustaining manner. You can actually see this take place in the video.

BLP states, "It is predicted that with sufficient silver vapor pressure, the power will persist by a self-sustaining hydrino reaction. Moreover, as designed, when the cell is operated as a silver boiler, the EM pump power may be terminated as well such that the parasitic load is zero except for the power consumed in electrolysis of water to provide the hydrogen fuel. In fact, the power did persist at the same level for long duration after the ignition power was terminated (See sections of the run indicated by the ignition-off video captions)."



Here's a look at the reactor:

High temp and copper plumbing always makes me confident. NOT

originally posted by: mikell
High temp and copper plumbing always makes me confident. NOT

Is that just cuz copper is such a god heat conductor? What would be better to use out of curiosity?

I love how the model looks nothing like the diagram, even allowing for small changes to the design. This is meaningless, i cant f*cking believe i have to say this all in caps, but: SHOW IT TO US WORKING AND POWERING SOMETHING.

Obviously, we all know why he cant and wont.

I love the commentary in here.

I show a video of a self-sustaining hydrino reaction, that has no possible explanation using standard physics, and people complain about copper piping and the lack of a fully completed prototype.

originally posted by: AnarchoCapitalist
I show a video of a self-sustaining hydrino reaction, that has no possible explanation using standard physics, and people complain about copper piping and the lack of a fully completed prototype.

Sure thing, pal *wink*

a reply to: AnarchoCapitalist

I will review this & give my opinion during the week. I wil examine anything & everything, but will hold it up to very close scrutiny.
Beware, for i have debunked many.
Rejoice, for i may endorse your ideas.
I for one, keep an open mind until experiments have been done....

ETA; Blacklight showed us some amazing things in the past, that still have yet to be proven by free agents such as myself.
While i agree that free energy UO machines are entireley possible, i am extremely sceptical of groups that make multiple claims under various names, that they actually have free energy.
Prove it, or lose it, is my motto, but then being a free agent, working mostly for myself, i don't have to prove anything to anybody.
Proving it for myself, and then taking the next logical step, is enough for me.

-PWM-

originally posted by: 3danimator2014

originally posted by: mikell
High temp and copper plumbing always makes me confident. NOT

Is that just cuz copper is such a god heat conductor? What would be better to use out of curiosity?

I love how the model looks nothing like the diagram, even allowing for small changes to the design. This is meaningless, i cant f*cking believe i have to say this all in caps, but: SHOW IT TO US WORKING AND POWERING SOMETHING.

Obviously, we all know why he cant and wont.

Well the working model very rarely depicts the diagram, and even the working model is nothing like the original concept, if it works it should be discussed, in great detail.

I have worked with many inventors who would not at first discuss their ideas in detail because obviously too much detail means someone will steal or copy your invention. This has happened to me several times, so i understand their dilemma.

So now i just say 'yes i did that' & don't go into details. If you are smart enough you can follow my trail, LOL
Or you can say i don't believe you, well thats cool, just continue in the world as you know it
Only a handful have managed to reproduce the tests, and they are now my closest freinds & allies, we rely on each other to be discreet. And honest.
Ahh so few, so very few.....

originally posted by: playswithmachines
Beware, for i have debunked many.

Blacklight showed us some amazing things in the past

Yeah for some reason I'm not exactly buying into your debunking skills.

originally posted by: AnarchoCapitalist
Mills reached over-unity in 2007, and went from concept to functional reactor within 9 years. All he has left to do is assemble the generator.

So where are all the papers backing this up? Something like over unity would be huge. Where's the functional reactor? Just how much money do you have invested in this scam?

originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
So where are all the papers backing this up? Something like over unity would be huge. Where's the functional reactor?

The same place as the QEG, the Orbo and other scams.

I was the first one to debunk Steorn & their orbo program go to unofficial steorn on YT & read my comments there, although they probably took it down, just like the Hutchisons do.

But the fact remains that so-called overunity is not only possible, it can be done in a number of different ways.
Geometry & math are the clues to follow. In electrical terms, there are stages. Stage 1 OU is typically 0.4% followed by 125%,485% and then 110,000% After that it gets kind of nuclear.....
Certainly the greatest number of achievements fall into the 4.85:1 category, as i have measured this myself in the late 90's. Most of my research since then has been improving & updating the tech, but those numbers remain the same wether you're working with milliwatts or megawatts.

The real problem is that there is so much BS out there it's becoming harder to spot the real stuff.
But, real stuff there is, there is absolutely no doubt about that.

Patrick J. Kelly compiled a fascinating encyclopedia of overunity & antigravity devices, cross referenced by inventor, invention, theory & date. Many patents are also listed. I have posted this book many times in the past as a useful reference guide for peeps investigating OU & all the so-called fringe science.

Remember, back in 1880 it was thought that anyone travelling faster than 60MPH would certainly die.
LOL

Want to know how Steorn did it?

a reply to: playswithmachines

If it can be done you can show us, right?

Until then, I'll call your "But the fact remains that so-called overunity is not only possible, it can be done in a number of different ways." as much BS as I call BLP.