Giant Noah’s Ark Attraction In Kentucky Features Caged Dinosaurs

originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
I'm only interested if there'll be a "swimming with the wenches" exhibit.

I would also accept being allowed to pet the wenches.

Yes.

originally posted by: Willtell
As for the size, God could have shrunk the animals to fit on Noah’s ark

As for the time element he could have time travelled back in time to put them on the ark

Hey man give me another hit on that crack pipe

I'm just wondering why he didn't simply make them breath underwater. Or hell, why flood the earth to begin with? If humans were the problem why not just kill them off precisely?

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Because they're only hiring the ones who believe the same. Isn't that discrimination? I'm sure they'd be firing back if it was a theme park who only hired people who were atheists or something. It's very anti-progress, in my opinion.

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: Willtell
As for the size, God could have shrunk the animals to fit on Noah’s ark

As for the time element he could have time travelled back in time to put them on the ark

Hey man give me another hit on that crack pipe

I'm just wondering why he didn't simply make them breath underwater. Or hell, why flood the earth to begin with? If humans were the problem why not just kill them off precisely?

It would seem god is woefully inefficient.

originally posted by: TerryDon79
Because they're only hiring the ones who believe the same. Isn't that discrimination?

I agree that it is. If I were a prospective employee, needed a job and they refused to hire me because I was not a religious wackadoodle I would contact a civil rights attorney. This place is a lawsuit waiting to happen.

a reply to: TerryDon79

Well keep in mind, the ruling I posted on the previous page is from a Kentucky Federal Court. So you're going to fill those judge's quarters with Kentuckians. *shrugs* Can't see the apple falling far from the tree there. We have to wait for higher level appeals to be processed it seems.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

So it's ok to discriminate and promote religion, as long as it's for tourism?

AiG would be up in arms if it was a theme park about the Big Bang or evolution.

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: Krazysh0t

So it's ok to discriminate and promote religion, as long as it's for tourism?

Apparently in Kentucky.

AiG would be up in arms if it was a theme park about the Big Bang or evolution.

Technically this already exists. We call them Science Museums. Washington DC has one of the best ones located in The Mall. Though they are mostly not for-profit.

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
If humans were the problem why not just kill them off precisely?

He could have Zika'd them into oblivion, but nooooooooooo, the vile Old Testament God had to kill every other living thing on the planet because: religion.

How does anyone believe this stuff?????

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

I can see plenty of lawsuits. Probably enough to close the place down.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

I'm sure he could just snap his fingers and every human would drop dead, but then again he needed the Jews' assistance to kill all the first borns in Egypt. Sooo....

dbl post

a reply to: Krazysh0t

But that's the difference. Non-profit vs for-profit. I just don't understand how they can possibly justify it. Saying "it promotes tourism" is an excuse to push their religious dogma, in my opinion.

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: Willtell
As for the size, God could have shrunk the animals to fit on Noah’s ark

As for the time element he could have time travelled back in time to put them on the ark

Hey man give me another hit on that crack pipe

I'm just wondering why he didn't simply make them breath underwater. Or hell, why flood the earth to begin with? If humans were the problem why not just kill them off precisely?

Its called magical thinking

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Raggedyman

You clearly don't know the definitions of "circumstantial evidence" and "empirical evidence" if you are going to say such things.

I mean if you believe that the cosmic microwave background or cosmic neutrino background are circumstantial evidence then you are clearly ignorant of these definitions.

He believes in creation, of course he doesn't know what these terms mean. He is simply parroting what he heard that crackpot say on the bill nye the science guy debates.

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: Krazysh0t

But that's the difference. Non-profit vs for-profit. I just don't understand how they can possibly justify it. Saying "it promotes tourism" is an excuse to push their religious dogma, in my opinion.

I agree. It doesn't make sense to me either, but have you ever been to Kentucky before? They seem to think differently (it IS part of the Bible Belt after all) and it seems like it is going to fall on a court outside of Kentucky to correct their incorrect thinking.

originally posted by: Willtell

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: Willtell
As for the size, God could have shrunk the animals to fit on Noah’s ark

As for the time element he could have time travelled back in time to put them on the ark

Hey man give me another hit on that crack pipe

I'm just wondering why he didn't simply make them breath underwater. Or hell, why flood the earth to begin with? If humans were the problem why not just kill them off precisely?

Its called magical thinking

It's called poor story telling is what it's called... >.>

a reply to: Krazysh0t

That would explain it. Definitely a pushed agenda then.

Never been there. Only been to Pennsylvania, New Jersey and driven around Lake Ontario. I'm from the UK lol.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

That too


though a story that has millions of believers has got something going for it

a reply to: Willtell

Yea. A PHENOMENAL marketing campaign.