Trey Gowdy news conference on Benghazi

originally posted by: UnBreakable

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: UnBreakable

originally posted by: introvert
I've been reading up on the reports so far and it appears that there is not much to learn. There's a whole lot of "should-coulda-woulda", but nothing damning against the Obama admin or Hillary.

Doesn't matter though. The Benghazi aspect has already been made in to a conspiracy that the Right Wing nuts will never let go.

Aren't you, even as a rabid Hillary apologist, even a bit curious as to why Hillary emailed Chelsea privately that the attack was an Al-Queda inspired terrorist attack, then publicly told the victims families and the public that it was because of a YouTube video?

Not really. That doesn't change what happened or how it was responded to.

Ok. Then I guess you won't bitch and moan when Trump tells differing stories on subjects where people didn't even die.

What the # are you talking about?

Are you guys really so desperate that you have to keep changing the subject?

Focus guys...it's not that hard.

a reply to: Gryphon66

Bush was a textbook lesson on failed foreign policy. While 9/11 is debatable as his, what occurred after is not. He will forever own the yellowcake invasion of iraq. I dont think anyone doubts that.

Obama campaigned against that type of foreign policy and then gave us more of the same.
No matter how much you deny Bengazi and murder of our ambassador is Obamas fault. Unless you can show me where Hillary objected to any of Obamas policies while SOS she gets blame as well.

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: Wardaddy454
Hillary Damge Control Team:

Introvert- Check

Sillyolme- Check

Buster2010- Check

Gryphon66- Check
______________________________________________________________________

Still Awaiting

Reldra

KrazyShot

Sremmos80

mOjOm
_______________________________________________________________________

Anyone I'm missing?


Its clear that the administration didnt want a black spot on its legacy and a losing debate point in the 2012 election.

She calls it a terrorist attack in an email to her daughter, yet tells the public its the fault of a video.
At the very least she does not deserve consideration for the highest office.

Also, is the video maker still locked up? And on what crime exactly?

Which team are you on? Your debate skills are really not good enough to be on the official Bash Hillary Team ...

You a freelancer then? You just trot along though all these threads trying to ... what ... qualify for the second string?

LOL.

LOL you call any of this debate? Everyones already made up their minds and its all a dog and pony show around here. Might as well have some fun with it

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: UnBreakable

originally posted by: introvert
I've been reading up on the reports so far and it appears that there is not much to learn. There's a whole lot of "should-coulda-woulda", but nothing damning against the Obama admin or Hillary.

Doesn't matter though. The Benghazi aspect has already been made in to a conspiracy that the Right Wing nuts will never let go.

Aren't you, even as a rabid Hillary apologist, even a bit curious as to why Hillary emailed Chelsea privately that the attack was an Al-Queda inspired terrorist attack, then publicly told the victims families and the public that it was because of a YouTube video?

Not really. That doesn't change what happened or how it was responded to.

And this is why no matter how much you protest, you will always be considered a Hillary lover.

Why do I give a # what you or others think?

You can't even address the topic at hand without making it personal.

Because you always virtue signal, thats why.

And I did address the topic

The topic is Benghazi, not me.

Stay on topic.

I'd consider reactions to be part of the topic...

Just me? Ok.

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Wardaddy454
Hillary Damge Control Team:

Introvert- Check

Sillyolme- Check

Buster2010- Check

Gryphon66- Check
______________________________________________________________________

Still Awaiting

Reldra

KrazyShot

Sremmos80

mOjOm
_______________________________________________________________________

Anyone I'm missing?


Its clear that the administration didnt want a black spot on its legacy and a losing debate point in the 2012 election.

She calls it a terrorist attack in an email to her daughter, yet tells the public its the fault of a video.
At the very least she does not deserve consideration for the highest office.

Also, is the video maker still locked up? And on what crime exactly?

No need for damage control. The report appears to not be the smoking gun ya'll had hoped for.

And that is why you are focusing on us, personally, instead of the report.

Well the comitee was asked to investigate Benghazi, not Clinton. The fact the you all are pointing out " whoops no smoking gun in Clinton's hand" is telling.

The Right Wing has made this about Hillary the entire time. That is why we have been hearing the same lines against her since this happened.

Are you going to deny that the Right Wing nut wanted to use Benghazi to fry Hillary?

a reply to: Wardaddy454

Its actually a 1-man show screaming and yelling "Benghazi!!!!!!!!!!!!!" in hopes to hurt the first black president and soon to be first lady president of the united states.

That's how I see it.

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: UnBreakable

originally posted by: introvert
I've been reading up on the reports so far and it appears that there is not much to learn. There's a whole lot of "should-coulda-woulda", but nothing damning against the Obama admin or Hillary.

Doesn't matter though. The Benghazi aspect has already been made in to a conspiracy that the Right Wing nuts will never let go.

Aren't you, even as a rabid Hillary apologist, even a bit curious as to why Hillary emailed Chelsea privately that the attack was an Al-Queda inspired terrorist attack, then publicly told the victims families and the public that it was because of a YouTube video?

Not really. That doesn't change what happened or how it was responded to.

And this is why no matter how much you protest, you will always be considered a Hillary lover.

Why do I give a # what you or others think?

You can't even address the topic at hand without making it personal.

Because you always virtue signal, thats why.

And I did address the topic

The topic is Benghazi, not me.

Stay on topic.

I'd consider reactions to be part of the topic...

Just me? Ok.

Fair enough. Considering the reactions so far, it appears you guys are butthurt by the results.

Nothing damaging against Hillary. Sorry. Try harder next time.

wow. Correct The Record is out in full force here.

On topic...I sure do like watching Trey Gowdy when he latches onto a point. I've seen alligators that would give up a free meal faster than Gowdy gives up a point when he wants an answer to it.

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Gryphon66

Bush was a textbook lesson on failed foreign policy. While 9/11 is debatable as his, what occurred after is not. He will forever own the yellowcake invasion of iraq. I dont think anyone doubts that.

Obama campaigned against that type of foreign policy and then gave us more of the same.
No matter how much you deny Bengazi and murder of our ambassador is Obamas fault. Unless you can show me where Hillary objected to any of Obamas policies while SOS she gets blame as well.

You can blame whomever you want according to your political beliefs, but that proves nothing.

No President is in control of what radicals in countries across the world do. That's patently absurd. If we condemned every President's foreign policy when anything anywhere in the world goes wrong, there wouldn't be a single President in history that could stand up to that. So your assignment of blame, while it will doubtless play to your shrinking Republican fringe, will be seen for what it is by the American people: politicizing a tragedy.

Keep it up. Every time you guys open your mouths, Obama's popularity goes up and Hillary's poll numbers rise.

(Of course, we have to give credit where credit is due on the last ... anyone's polls would be going up against the Trump Trainwreck.)

originally posted by: netwarrior
wow. Correct The Record is out in full force here.

On topic...I sure do like watching Trey Gowdy when he latches onto a point. I've seen alligators that would give up a free meal faster than Gowdy gives up a point when he wants an answer to it.

And his point today was ... no finding of fault for Clinton or Obama.

This can't look good on him. This Ninth investigation was supposed to dredge up SOMETHING to stop Clinton, LOL.

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Wardaddy454
Hillary Damge Control Team:

Introvert- Check

Sillyolme- Check

Buster2010- Check

Gryphon66- Check
______________________________________________________________________

Still Awaiting

Reldra

KrazyShot

Sremmos80

mOjOm
_______________________________________________________________________

Anyone I'm missing?


Its clear that the administration didnt want a black spot on its legacy and a losing debate point in the 2012 election.

She calls it a terrorist attack in an email to her daughter, yet tells the public its the fault of a video.
At the very least she does not deserve consideration for the highest office.

Also, is the video maker still locked up? And on what crime exactly?

No need for damage control. The report appears to not be the smoking gun ya'll had hoped for.

And that is why you are focusing on us, personally, instead of the report.

Well the comitee was asked to investigate Benghazi, not Clinton. The fact the you all are pointing out " whoops no smoking gun in Clinton's hand" is telling.

The Right Wing has made this about Hillary the entire time. That is why we have been hearing the same lines against her since this happened.

Are you going to deny that the Right Wing nut wanted to use Benghazi to fry Hillary?

Are you going to deny that lack of action is culpability?

originally posted by: veracity
a reply to: Wardaddy454

Its actually a 1-man show screaming and yelling "Benghazi!!!!!!!!!!!!!" in hopes to hurt the first black president and soon to be first lady president of the united states.

That's how I see it.

... and that's the way most Americans will see it.

They don't realize yet that they're replaying 1998-99.

a reply to: Wardaddy454

That dog does not hunt old stick.

The news conference was an exercise in repetition and not one singular new piece of information was revealed during it. Not one.

The conference, and the situation it regards, are the subject matter of this thread, not the opinions of members of this site, not the fact that members here are not all politically aligned to the right, and not any other matter, save the report, the situation it relates to, and the content of the report and the results of the committee. So far, there have been no actual results. The speakers have merely repeated old suspicions.

Suspicions, I might add, which I share. But nothing they have said amounts to anything more than we already knew, and they have singularly failed to produce any actionable information of any kind. Discussing that, not one another's political affiliation, is the purpose of this thread.

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Wardaddy454
Hillary Damge Control Team:

Introvert- Check

Sillyolme- Check

Buster2010- Check

Gryphon66- Check
______________________________________________________________________

Still Awaiting

Reldra

KrazyShot

Sremmos80

mOjOm
_______________________________________________________________________

Anyone I'm missing?


Its clear that the administration didnt want a black spot on its legacy and a losing debate point in the 2012 election.

She calls it a terrorist attack in an email to her daughter, yet tells the public its the fault of a video.
At the very least she does not deserve consideration for the highest office.

Also, is the video maker still locked up? And on what crime exactly?

No need for damage control. The report appears to not be the smoking gun ya'll had hoped for.

And that is why you are focusing on us, personally, instead of the report.

Well the comitee was asked to investigate Benghazi, not Clinton. The fact the you all are pointing out " whoops no smoking gun in Clinton's hand" is telling.

The Right Wing has made this about Hillary the entire time. That is why we have been hearing the same lines against her since this happened.

Are you going to deny that the Right Wing nut wanted to use Benghazi to fry Hillary?

Are you going to deny that lack of action is culpability?

Not when it's already been known that there was not much, if anything, they could have done.

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: Wardaddy454
Hillary Damge Control Team:

Introvert- Check

Sillyolme- Check

Buster2010- Check

Gryphon66- Check
______________________________________________________________________

Still Awaiting

Reldra

KrazyShot

Sremmos80

mOjOm
_______________________________________________________________________

Anyone I'm missing?


Its clear that the administration didnt want a black spot on its legacy and a losing debate point in the 2012 election.

She calls it a terrorist attack in an email to her daughter, yet tells the public its the fault of a video.
At the very least she does not deserve consideration for the highest office.

Also, is the video maker still locked up? And on what crime exactly?

Which team are you on? Your debate skills are really not good enough to be on the official Bash Hillary Team ...

You a freelancer then? You just trot along though all these threads trying to ... what ... qualify for the second string?

LOL.

LOL you call any of this debate? Everyones already made up their minds and its all a dog and pony show around here. Might as well have some fun with it

Yet, you chime in and try to remain relevant while contributing little to nothing.

If you're so contemptuous of ATS and what we do here ... why bother?

originally posted by: Wardaddy454
Hillary Damge Control Team:

Introvert- Check

Sillyolme- Check

Buster2010- Check

Gryphon66- Check
______________________________________________________________________

Still Awaiting

Reldra

KrazyShot

Sremmos80

mOjOm
_______________________________________________________________________

Anyone I'm missing?

Cool, I made the list!!! I don't know why however since I don't like Hillary and don't support her. But it's nice to be thought of anyway.

You Conservatives really do suck at figuring out who's doing what, don't ya??? Maybe launch a few more investigations in to who I actually support before falsely placing me on your stupid little list next time. Because this makes you look pretty lame.

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: Wardaddy454
Hillary Damge Control Team:

Introvert- Check

Sillyolme- Check

Buster2010- Check

Gryphon66- Check
______________________________________________________________________

Still Awaiting

Reldra

KrazyShot

Sremmos80

mOjOm
_______________________________________________________________________

Anyone I'm missing?


Its clear that the administration didnt want a black spot on its legacy and a losing debate point in the 2012 election.

She calls it a terrorist attack in an email to her daughter, yet tells the public its the fault of a video.
At the very least she does not deserve consideration for the highest office.

Also, is the video maker still locked up? And on what crime exactly?

Which team are you on? Your debate skills are really not good enough to be on the official Bash Hillary Team ...

You a freelancer then? You just trot along though all these threads trying to ... what ... qualify for the second string?

LOL.

LOL you call any of this debate? Everyones already made up their minds and its all a dog and pony show around here. Might as well have some fun with it

Yet, you chime in and try to remain relevant while contributing little to nothing.

If you're so contemptuous of ATS and what we do here ... why bother?

Gives me something to do on my lunch breaks lol.

originally posted by: mOjOm

originally posted by: Wardaddy454
Hillary Damge Control Team:

Introvert- Check

Sillyolme- Check

Buster2010- Check

Gryphon66- Check
______________________________________________________________________

Still Awaiting

Reldra

KrazyShot

Sremmos80

mOjOm
_______________________________________________________________________

Anyone I'm missing?

Cool, I made the list!!! I don't know why however since I don't like Hillary and don't support her. But it's nice to be thought of anyway.

You Conservatives really do suck at figuring out who's doing what, don't ya??? Maybe launch a few more investigations in to who I actually support before falsely placing me on your stupid little list next time. Because this makes you look pretty lame.

Cool, mOjOm thinks I'm lame!

I love being provocative

a reply to: mOjOm

the list is cracking me up, I mean ~~~why the f was this list made?~~~

I do hope to make the next "list" tho

a reply to: mOjOm

"It's an honor to be nominated."

LOL

Hillary, in my estimation, is center Right, overall. She's a life-long politician with all the negatives that implies.

Still, with all the issues, she's better than an bloviating ego maniac who thinks he's buying another company instead of running for the highest office in the land.