Trey Gowdy news conference on Benghazi

This. Yes.

a reply to: burgerbuddy

Bed time.

See ya'll in the morning.

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: burgerbuddy

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: burgerbuddy

originally posted by: introvert
Good lord.

Now a member of the committee and on stage blaming the media and the democrats.

What a bunch of punks.

What's not true about that?

You guys are living proof he is correct.

He said it was the media and the democrats that were making this issue about one person.

That is half true. The Right Wing media and the Right Wing nuts have made this about Hillary since day one. It is disingenuous to try to shift blame to the Democrats once they finally end their investigation and do not have a smoking gun.

Are you willing to admit that this has always been about Hillary and trying to find something to stick to her?

On advice of my counsel,

I invoke my 5th amendment rights.

125 times, if need be.

That how dishonest and disingenuous many on the Right are.

I hate when that happens, 'cause it never happens on the left.

Judicial Watch: Clinton IT staffer pleads 5th 125 consecutive times

www.cnn.com...

Hillary Damge Control Team:

Introvert- Check

Sillyolme- Check

Buster2010- Check

Gryphon66- Check
______________________________________________________________________

Still Awaiting

Reldra

KrazyShot

Sremmos80

mOjOm
_______________________________________________________________________

Anyone I'm missing?


Its clear that the administration didnt want a black spot on its legacy and a losing debate point in the 2012 election.

She calls it a terrorist attack in an email to her daughter, yet tells the public its the fault of a video.
At the very least she does not deserve consideration for the highest office.

Also, is the video maker still locked up? And on what crime exactly?

With all due respect, the fact is we had four dead Americans. Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided that they’d they go kill some Americans? What difference at this point does it make? It is our job to figure out what happened and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again, Senator.

-Hillary Clinton

Indeed.

So, what do we have? The ninth consecutive investigation, $7 million more dollars gone, same conclusions as the other eight investigations, no blame for Clinton, or Obama, or anyone.

Here, let's let Trey Gowdy tell you himself:

“I’m not going to make a reckless allegation that [they] could have been saved,” Gowdy said. Asked directly if Gowdy thought Americans who read the report should find culpability for Clinton, Gowdy declined to say so.

HuffPo

Yep, the Congressional Republicans are just about the most lame excuse for political operatives EVER.

originally posted by: UnBreakable

originally posted by: introvert
I've been reading up on the reports so far and it appears that there is not much to learn. There's a whole lot of "should-coulda-woulda", but nothing damning against the Obama admin or Hillary.

Doesn't matter though. The Benghazi aspect has already been made in to a conspiracy that the Right Wing nuts will never let go.

Aren't you, even as a rabid Hillary apologist, even a bit curious as to why Hillary emailed Chelsea privately that the attack was an Al-Queda inspired terrorist attack, then publicly told the victims families and the public that it was because of a YouTube video?

Not really. That doesn't change what happened or how it was responded to.

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: UnBreakable

originally posted by: introvert
I've been reading up on the reports so far and it appears that there is not much to learn. There's a whole lot of "should-coulda-woulda", but nothing damning against the Obama admin or Hillary.

Doesn't matter though. The Benghazi aspect has already been made in to a conspiracy that the Right Wing nuts will never let go.

Aren't you, even as a rabid Hillary apologist, even a bit curious as to why Hillary emailed Chelsea privately that the attack was an Al-Queda inspired terrorist attack, then publicly told the victims families and the public that it was because of a YouTube video?

Not really. That doesn't change what happened or how it was responded to.

And this is why no matter how much you protest, you will always be considered a Hillary lover.

originally posted by: burgerbuddy

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: burgerbuddy

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: burgerbuddy

originally posted by: introvert
Good lord.

Now a member of the committee and on stage blaming the media and the democrats.

What a bunch of punks.

What's not true about that?

You guys are living proof he is correct.

He said it was the media and the democrats that were making this issue about one person.

That is half true. The Right Wing media and the Right Wing nuts have made this about Hillary since day one. It is disingenuous to try to shift blame to the Democrats once they finally end their investigation and do not have a smoking gun.

Are you willing to admit that this has always been about Hillary and trying to find something to stick to her?

On advice of my counsel,

I invoke my 5th amendment rights.

125 times, if need be.

Exactly.

That how dishonest and disingenuous many on the Right are.

They spent millions of our tax dollars and spread constant propaganda about how guilty Obama and Hillary are, and now that the investigation does not produce the smoking gun...it's the Democrat's fault and you guys backtrack from your previous statements.

Since when have the left EVER worried about spending money?

Hillary approved something like 20 mil for libya's security BS.

But no money for the ambassador.

So ya'll can look it up when you read the report.

Another example of someone missing the point.

I thought the Republicans and the "conservatives" cared about fiscal responsibility, but apparently they have no problem spending money on witch hunts, who's results come to match exactly what we knew it would be all along.

Well, Hillary was telling the families they were going to get the video maker very early on from reports. For what? It wasn't until later he was arrested for other charges, something about bad checks or some other financial fraud but nothing to do with the video. So they went after this guy in full force to make it seem like the video was at fault when all signs point clearly in the opposite direction. It was the SD's fault.

originally posted by: UnBreakable

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: burgerbuddy

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: burgerbuddy

originally posted by: introvert
Good lord.

Now a member of the committee and on stage blaming the media and the democrats.

What a bunch of punks.

What's not true about that?

You guys are living proof he is correct.

He said it was the media and the democrats that were making this issue about one person.

That is half true. The Right Wing media and the Right Wing nuts have made this about Hillary since day one. It is disingenuous to try to shift blame to the Democrats once they finally end their investigation and do not have a smoking gun.

Are you willing to admit that this has always been about Hillary and trying to find something to stick to her?

On advice of my counsel,

I invoke my 5th amendment rights.

125 times, if need be.

That how dishonest and disingenuous many on the Right are.

I hate when that happens, 'cause it never happens on the left.

Judicial Watch: Clinton IT staffer pleads 5th 125 consecutive times

www.cnn.com...

Nice red herring. Care to address the topic at hand, or are we going to use distractions to take attention away from the fact this investigation did not turn out as many hoped.

originally posted by: Wardaddy454
Hillary Damge Control Team:

Introvert- Check

Sillyolme- Check

Buster2010- Check

Gryphon66- Check
______________________________________________________________________

Still Awaiting

Reldra

KrazyShot

Sremmos80

mOjOm
_______________________________________________________________________

Anyone I'm missing?


Its clear that the administration didnt want a black spot on its legacy and a losing debate point in the 2012 election.

She calls it a terrorist attack in an email to her daughter, yet tells the public its the fault of a video.
At the very least she does not deserve consideration for the highest office.

Also, is the video maker still locked up? And on what crime exactly?

No need for damage control. The report appears to not be the smoking gun ya'll had hoped for.

And that is why you are focusing on us, personally, instead of the report.

a reply to: Gryphon66

So, what do we have? The ninth consecutive investigation, $7 million more dollars gone, same conclusions as the other eight investigations, no blame for Clinton, or Obama, or anyone.

No blame other than this was a result of Obamas failed foreign policy, whose chief adviser at the time was Clinton.
If they don't own this event who does?

originally posted by: buster2010
Actually the nitwit admitted the reports were a failure.
Trey Gowdy Just Accidentally Admitted That The House Benghazi Report Is A Total Failure

The resulting report was an 800-page long rehash of various Republican conspiracies and allegations. The facts that Gowdy pointed to don’t back up anything that Republicans have been claiming about Benghazi for years. There no evidence of criminal activity or a criminal conspiracy. Republicans conclude in their biased partisan opinion that things “should have been known,” but they present no real evidence to back up their claims. The press release on the report was pure damage control spin, as the emphasis was placed on generating a lot of pages in the hope that the volume of the report could disguise its lack of substance. Gowdy defended the report by practically begging the American people to read it, which points to what the real motivation for the investigation has always been. Republicans wasted millions of taxpayer dollars on a publicity effort to get voters interested in a conspiracy theory.

Jason Easley seems like a good source

www.politicususa.com...

Trey Gowdy Just Accidentally Admitted That The House Benghazi Report Is A Total Failure

CNN Shows Their Anti-Clinton Bias By Going All In For Trump With Corey Lewandowski Hire

Two Tweets Prove That Donald Trump Isn’t Even Trying To Run For President

Republicans Facing Catastrophe As Trump Leads Clinton By Single Digits In Texas

Hillary Clinton And Elizabeth Warren Team Up To Devastate Donald Trump In Ohio

Loretta Lynch Storms Fox News And Destroys The GOP Clinton Email Conspiracy

One Chart Exposes How The Media Bashes Hillary Clinton While Promoting Donald Trump

Obama Approval Rating Skyrockets To 56% As GOP Faces Trump Led Collapse

Trump Supporting Neo-Nazis Stab 5 People At Protest In Sacramento

Hillary Clinton Is Outspending Trump’s Broke Ass Campaign $17 Million To $0 On TV Ads


These are some quick examples from the first couple pages of his trash, It goes on for 338 more. I'm sure there's some real gems.. You might want to consider thumbing through the report yourself unless you enjoy mind numbingly retarded spin.

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: UnBreakable

originally posted by: introvert
I've been reading up on the reports so far and it appears that there is not much to learn. There's a whole lot of "should-coulda-woulda", but nothing damning against the Obama admin or Hillary.

Doesn't matter though. The Benghazi aspect has already been made in to a conspiracy that the Right Wing nuts will never let go.

Aren't you, even as a rabid Hillary apologist, even a bit curious as to why Hillary emailed Chelsea privately that the attack was an Al-Queda inspired terrorist attack, then publicly told the victims families and the public that it was because of a YouTube video?

Not really. That doesn't change what happened or how it was responded to.

And this is why no matter how much you protest, you will always be considered a Hillary lover.

Why do I give a # what you or others think?

You can't even address the topic at hand without making it personal.

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Gryphon66

So, what do we have? The ninth consecutive investigation, $7 million more dollars gone, same conclusions as the other eight investigations, no blame for Clinton, or Obama, or anyone.

No blame other than this was a result of Obamas failed foreign policy, whose chief adviser at the time was Clinton.
If they don't own this event who does?

Still trying eh? I hope you guys keep going ! The more you beat on this drum the more you're going to look like whiners.

Still though,I'll play. 9/11 was a result of GW Bush's failed foreign policy? Beirut was a result of Reagan's failed policy?

Keep trying to sell that. No one's buying.

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: UnBreakable

originally posted by: introvert
I've been reading up on the reports so far and it appears that there is not much to learn. There's a whole lot of "should-coulda-woulda", but nothing damning against the Obama admin or Hillary.

Doesn't matter though. The Benghazi aspect has already been made in to a conspiracy that the Right Wing nuts will never let go.

Aren't you, even as a rabid Hillary apologist, even a bit curious as to why Hillary emailed Chelsea privately that the attack was an Al-Queda inspired terrorist attack, then publicly told the victims families and the public that it was because of a YouTube video?

Not really. That doesn't change what happened or how it was responded to.

And this is why no matter how much you protest, you will always be considered a Hillary lover.

Why do I give a # what you or others think?

You can't even address the topic at hand without making it personal.

Because you always virtue signal, thats why.

And I did address the topic

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: UnBreakable

originally posted by: introvert
I've been reading up on the reports so far and it appears that there is not much to learn. There's a whole lot of "should-coulda-woulda", but nothing damning against the Obama admin or Hillary.

Doesn't matter though. The Benghazi aspect has already been made in to a conspiracy that the Right Wing nuts will never let go.

Aren't you, even as a rabid Hillary apologist, even a bit curious as to why Hillary emailed Chelsea privately that the attack was an Al-Queda inspired terrorist attack, then publicly told the victims families and the public that it was because of a YouTube video?

Not really. That doesn't change what happened or how it was responded to.

Ok. Then I guess you won't bitch and moan when Trump tells differing stories on subjects where people didn't even die.

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Wardaddy454
Hillary Damge Control Team:

Introvert- Check

Sillyolme- Check

Buster2010- Check

Gryphon66- Check
______________________________________________________________________

Still Awaiting

Reldra

KrazyShot

Sremmos80

mOjOm
_______________________________________________________________________

Anyone I'm missing?


Its clear that the administration didnt want a black spot on its legacy and a losing debate point in the 2012 election.

She calls it a terrorist attack in an email to her daughter, yet tells the public its the fault of a video.
At the very least she does not deserve consideration for the highest office.

Also, is the video maker still locked up? And on what crime exactly?

No need for damage control. The report appears to not be the smoking gun ya'll had hoped for.

And that is why you are focusing on us, personally, instead of the report.

Well the comitee was asked to investigate Benghazi, not Clinton. The fact the you all are pointing out " whoops no smoking gun in Clinton's hand" is telling.

originally posted by: Wardaddy454
Hillary Damge Control Team:

Introvert- Check

Sillyolme- Check

Buster2010- Check

Gryphon66- Check
______________________________________________________________________

Still Awaiting

Reldra

KrazyShot

Sremmos80

mOjOm
_______________________________________________________________________

Anyone I'm missing?


Its clear that the administration didnt want a black spot on its legacy and a losing debate point in the 2012 election.

She calls it a terrorist attack in an email to her daughter, yet tells the public its the fault of a video.
At the very least she does not deserve consideration for the highest office.

Also, is the video maker still locked up? And on what crime exactly?

Which team are you on? Your debate skills are really not good enough to be on the official Bash Hillary Team ...

You a freelancer then? You just trot along though all these threads trying to ... what ... qualify for the second string?

LOL.

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: UnBreakable

originally posted by: introvert
I've been reading up on the reports so far and it appears that there is not much to learn. There's a whole lot of "should-coulda-woulda", but nothing damning against the Obama admin or Hillary.

Doesn't matter though. The Benghazi aspect has already been made in to a conspiracy that the Right Wing nuts will never let go.

Aren't you, even as a rabid Hillary apologist, even a bit curious as to why Hillary emailed Chelsea privately that the attack was an Al-Queda inspired terrorist attack, then publicly told the victims families and the public that it was because of a YouTube video?

Not really. That doesn't change what happened or how it was responded to.

And this is why no matter how much you protest, you will always be considered a Hillary lover.

Why do I give a # what you or others think?

You can't even address the topic at hand without making it personal.

Because you always virtue signal, thats why.

And I did address the topic

The topic is Benghazi, not me.

Stay on topic.