It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: seagull
Showing disrespect to one this nations highest symbols.
Is a topic worthy of debate.
Rather easy to see why they make websites that don't work.
originally posted by: MrSpad
originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: seagull
Showing disrespect to one this nations highest symbols.
Is a topic worthy of debate.
Rather easy to see why they make websites that don't work.
Then I know you will be bashing Bush for this www.whitehouse.gov..." target="_blank" class="postlink">White House Logo 2003
Not that this should even be a thing.
Description
Logo of the United States White House, especially in conjunction with offices like the Chief of Staff and Press Secretary.
Date 19 September 2003
Source Extracted from PDF version of a 2003 progress report (direct PDF URL www.whitehouse.gov...).
Author U.S. federal government
Permission
(Reusing this file)
Public domain from a copyright standpoint, but other restrictions apply
originally posted by: Konduit
Original WH logo.
Obama's revision of the WH logo.
Why is the American flag missing/replaced?
originally posted by: Metallicus
a reply to: xuenchen
How did a man that actually hates our country get elected? Oh, that's right he had a 'D' next to his name.
The cartoon style logo show a flag flying on the White House, but it's a white flag.
Older logos had the American Flag in red-white & blue.
What gives ?
originally posted by: eriktheawful
So...sorry, if you're going to start making wild claims about presidents changing the flag over the white house on the logo, better go back and look at George W. Bush first.
Or rather: let's look for something and try to make a mountain out of a mole hill issue.
originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: xuenchen
Maybe they just wanted to "simplify" the logo.
We decided to clean it up and create two versions: a more streamlined version that kept the important details minus the triangle over the window, and a simplified version for digital use. We also optimized the kerning and tracking of the logotype
What's ironic is that the AdWeek article mentions an error where one of the window pediments (ffs people, things have names) is a triangle instead of a crescent shape (if you look, they alternate on the sides) which led some people to think that it was supposed to represent a pyramid and therefore a big wink wink to the Illuminati.
People are dumb. I don't know what else there's to be said.
originally posted by: eriktheawful
Oh, and btw -
That's a logo. That's all it is.
Big deal.
Want to know what image is actually the important one? This one:
That's the actual SEAL of the office.
Which one is used for official use? The Seal.
Which one is nice deco? The logo.
Non-issue.
Or rather: let's look for something and try to make a mountain out of a mole hill issue.
originally posted by: Metallicus
a reply to: xuenchen
How did a man that actually hates our country get elected? Oh, that's right he had a 'D' next to his name.