Hillary Clinton's emails are a non-scandal: Column

a reply to: ratfintc

And the information on the 200 page doc that was released was information anyone could get from the internet. Every news agency has said this. It's very basic stuff like a first report type info before it's fleshed out.
No I didn't read it. Did you?

a reply to: atomish

And both of those sources which were only two of dozens say the server is a program.
IT specialist...yeah sure.

Face facts people. I am an unashamed Trump supporter. But looking at things realistically, Hillary will no doubt be your next POTUS. Even though they both have astronomical unfavorables (Trump 70%, Clinton 55%) in this current world we live in, the elite would rather have an unethical (maybe not a proven criminal) than a perceived bigot to the rest of the world. All in the name of political correctness, to hell with sovereign security. My only satisfaction will be to see all the dissatisfied people who voted for Obama and have bitched about him for the past eight years, have to deal with Hillary for the next eight. Those same people will long for the good 'ol days under Obama when they see all the corruption that will be the hallmark of the new admin. Good-bye and good luck, America.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: atomish

And both of those sources which were only two of dozens say the server is a program.
IT specialist...yeah sure.

A server CAN BE a program. You should have kept reading.

When we are talking about Hillary's server, we are NOT talking about a server application. We are talking about the entire device and the peripherals communicating with it on the network. This includes ANY applications the server runs as well as any data stored in internal storage devices, and then some.

This is why I never told you you were incorrect. Because you technically aren't.

It's just that no one who actually knows what they are talking about, especially in this context, would ever say "a server is a program." That just reeks of someone who read a technical definition without comprehending it entirely.

I'm not blaming you for not understanding those concepts, I don't expect the average citizen to be as technically inclined as software developers and IT professionals. What I AM blaming you for is walking around talking like you know what you're talking about. And calling people puppets, claiming they use buzzwords, when you clearly are the same, doing the same.

I'd be glad to help you understand if you actually ever paid attention to people when they try and help educate you in an arena you know little about.

a reply to: Sillyolme

The latest distribution I received and reviewed included 12 files totaling 10.4 MB uncompressed. It included the big donor list of the top 20 donors who contributed $500k to $1M. This list also included about the top 40 Obama supporting billionaires who are expected to contribute $1M to HRC super pac.

It also included the friends of HRC in government list including 187 individuals and included names positions, official titles, and lots of their email addresses. Another was the committed donor list, and it included the funding commitment amounts, names, and email addresses of this list of 665 individuals from industry to banking, and insurance companies and various pacs. It contained another list of 320 individuals that had previously committed but had not responded to confirm amounts. This list also included private and public email addresses along with names, company names, and contact notes.

The next file included the top 104 larger donors who had already donated $100k-$5M and that list did not include email addresses so could have been taken from public records. The next was a prospects list composed of 556 government officials derived from The Plum Book so again likely just a research document since it was compiled from public records.

The Donald Trump Opposition research which was the 204 page document. The nature of those type of documents is they can be fact checked so it could have been faked but it was a lot of work so why? Who benefits? The DNC Goals & Strategies Doc looks legit to me. They would not want this type of info public. Home Base, which was the talking points brief shows the DNC perception skewing machine for what it is.

The one market Secret: Promises and Proposals – National Security & Foreign Policy looked to me like something rehashed from the Obama transition team materials. The same with the one marked Confidential: NATIONAL SECURITY TRANSITION PLANNING. That was an old Obama transition team briefing doc.

The Wikileaks database of HRC emails I have barely scratched the surface of those. I have a spider crawling it through rotating proxies but keep getting booted but have managed to transfer a lot of it to some of of my data stash spots in NZ and IO.

The emails of 2013 from Sidney Blumenthal to Hillary Clinton at her private email account @clintonemail.com I have not formed an opinion on that yet but it is interesting material for speculation.

Good reminder article ....

The DNC hacked

The story obviously bears on the mind-boggling story of the private server used by Hillary Clinton to conduct official business as Secretary of State. The hack of the DNC appears to have gone on for a year before it was discovered. The identity of the perpetrators is unclear. The penetration was wide and deep. According to the Post: “The intruders so thoroughly compromised the DNC’s system that they also were able to read all email and chat traffic.” Hmmmm.

At Forbes, Paul Gregory quotes CrowdStrike on the hack: “[I]t is extremely difficult for a civilian organization to protect itself from a skilled and determined state such as Russia.” That too seems to bear rather directly on the case of Clinton’s private server. Gregory draws out the relevance of the hack of the DNC to the Clinton case in a way that the other stories overlook.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Wardaddy454

Oh yeah. He just dabbled...what ever.

Whatever you gotta tell yourself.

I have complete confidence that the FBI will recommend indictments fro Hillary and her crew.


110% confidence.


Tick tock goes the FBI criminal investigation clock.

originally posted by: RickinVa
I have complete confidence that the FBI will recommend indictments fro Hillary and her crew.


110% confidence.


Tick tock goes the FBI criminal investigation clock.

I wish, I really wish that were true. But, if you just look at what is going on with the Orlando Islamic Terrorist massacre, the FBI has released redacted statemets, changed "allah" to god, and is not telling the american public the truth.....plus they are swamped but other terrorists planning attacks in all 50 states.

So, with the DOJ lynch already being hard pressed by Obama....secret, no press allowed meeting last week, just the current state of affairs of cover-up, I sadly believe an indictment won't happen.

The FBI will come out with a statement that says something like: ' after an intense and thorough investigation of the Secretary of States personal emails, secret server, we have found nothing that put our National Security at risk and therefore, no further action on this matter is warranted.' Then they will cite not releasing heavily redacted emails as personal and not part of the investigation.

I am just worn down, don't believe my government anymore and do not trust Obama and his phony fight against ISIS. He is a sympathizer of the Muslim Brotherhood, obviously so is crooked Hillary and her very close aide Huma.

We will never hear the truth....I tend to think back at all of the scandals and then...some other false flag happens and the Mass Lame Liberal Media distracts us.....and then down the rabbit hole we go.......I hope I am wrong.

So, if Hillary didn't send classified emails using her server, and she didn't use government servers, Just how DID she send and receive classified emails?