originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: AMPTAH
I am convinced there is government involvement in this somehow. Whether they were setting up a sting just to bust him... or they wanted this to go
down... or they just dropped the ball. But I think whatever it was, something
There's 100% certainty the US Government is involved. But, exactly what they were hoping to accomplish is uncertain.
Omar Mateen's father is apparently running for
"
President of Afghanistan"
The problem he had, was that Islam is the State Religion in Afghanistan, and Islam frowns upon homosexuals, but he has an embarrassing problem, having
raised a "gay son", whose openly gay activities weren't helping the father's campaign. What kind of Father figure lets his own son stray from the path
of the good Muslim?
This was a problem that had to be solved, since the Father was a valuable CIA asset, whom the US would like to see winning the Afghanistan
Presidential election.
How do you make an embarrassing problem like this go away? Especially, in such a way, that the Father could "save face", and the US would get their
man in position of power over there?
First important thing, you've got to change that image from "Gay son regularly attending Gay Night Club" to something more muslims would accept, like
"Radicalized Islamic Jihadist terrorizing the decadent Western Powers by shooting a massive number of homosexual Americans, purifying the world and
getting praise from Allah, and of course, the 72 virgins in heaven for reward".
That's probably why the FBI told Mateen's wife not to let the American Media know that Omar Mateen was gay. They wanted the news headlines all around
the world to suggest Jihadist action, not jilted gay lover. Having a Jihadi son would show strength in the Father, standing up to the western powers,
while having a gay son would show weakness and lack of ability to guide the nation, if you can't even guide you own children.
Now, many people say they thought there were multiple shooters in the club.
What if, Omar Mateen wasn't even one of the shooters? What if, on instruction from the father, the US government was given the ok to take his son out,
by any means possible, to remove the embarrassing problem. So, they send in a team of mercenaries, shoot up the place, kill Mateen, frame him, and
build the Jihadist story around his death, to erase the "image" of a weak homosexual son of an important Presidential Candidate, in a critically
important foreign nation that the US needs as an ally?
Something along those lines, is probably closer to the truth of the whole story.
21stcenturywire.com... edit on 20-6-2016 by AMPTAH because: (no reason
given)