It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Harte
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: AVtech34
a reply to: reldra
An attack? Did you or did you not create a thread to insult right wingers? Put your purse down why don't you. Us mean ol "right-wingers" won't stop exercising our first amendment rights because you want us to.
When? You accuse me of 'just' having done so. You also say you are convinced I am part of the group that is 'all one person'. 'Put my purse down'? You are part of the problem described by the OP.
I think he means horrible, mean and rude posts like this:
originally posted by: Triton1128
a reply to: Harte
So you're telling me. A civilization that had no written language, and had not discovered the wheel yet. Was able to hewn stone out of quarrys from over 60 miles away to an altitude of 12,000 ft. Then somehow had the mathematical knowledge to create stonework that today trumps some of our best Stonemasons even with the use of diamond tools and lasers.
Not to mention HOW they moved 100 ton blocks. OR what tools they used to create the masterful work that we find.
originally posted by: Harte
Yes.
originally posted by: Triton1128You explain to me how they created the above with chicken bones and stone hammers and Ill retract my opinions.
originally posted by: HarteIt's been explained, and you can keep your opinion for as long as you want - even in the face of evidence to the contrary. Odd that you ignore centuries of metallurgy and go for the chicken bone.
There's plenty of information on your questions right here at ATS, though I realize the search function here leaves a lot to be desired.
You know, incredulity carries no weight when making an argument.
Harte
Harte
originally posted by: Harte
Yes.
originally posted by: Triton1128You explain to me how they created the above with chicken bones and stone hammers and Ill retract my opinions.
originally posted by: HarteIt's been explained, and you can keep your opinion for as long as you want - even in the face of evidence to the contrary. Odd that you ignore centuries of metallurgy and go for the chicken bone.
There's plenty of information on your questions right here at ATS, though I realize the search function here leaves a lot to be desired.
You know, incredulity carries no weight when making an argument.
Thequotes are not working properly.Below is my comment:
No, that is not what the person I was replying to meant. Completely different person and thing.
Your reply to Triton1128 in that thread- I would imagine in Ancient Civilizations-, is smug, lazy and has no backup other than telling him/her to search through all of ATS for proof.edit on 12-6-2016 by reldra because: (no reason given)edit on 12-6-2016 by reldra because: (no reason given)edit on 12-6-2016 by reldra because: (no reason given)
originally posted by: FlyInTheOintment
a reply to: projectvxn
Oh great, another pathetic thread ...
Oh great, another BS insult. Your whole post was framed as an insult. Which kind of proves that you don't like people having the space to share ideas without their being boxed in by trolls & naysayers who use insults. Like you just did.
Oh great, another pathetic thread ...
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: reldra
Other than me you are my favorite shill on ATS.
What did you use your check on this month? (I bought beer)
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: reldra
Perfect. I will send out the Sock Puppet alert and get all of us in there to star ourselves.
Evidence must be suppressed!!!!!
originally posted by: reldra
They do make time and a 1/2 on Sundays.
I will have to offer them stars in threads about bathrooms in return. One hand washes the other.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: reldra
They do make time and a 1/2 on Sundays.
Don't feel bad that we have a strong union.
I will have to offer them stars in threads about bathrooms in return. One hand washes the other.
I may use my other accounts to argue with myself so it is not that obvious I work for the NSA.
Oh, just and FYI, I got the satellite restasked for you. Have fun peeping on the nutters.
originally posted by: reldra
I think your cover is blown, in regard to the NSA. You could go in one Hillary email thread and say her emails are her business and go in another and say something about high crimes and misdemeanors. Just thinking off the top of my head.
Thank you for adjusting the satellite. Your selections on pronhub are banal at best.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: reldra
I think your cover is blown, in regard to the NSA. You could go in one Hillary email thread and say her emails are her business and go in another and say something about high crimes and misdemeanors. Just thinking off the top of my head.
Perfect idea. I was thinking of doing a set of pro/anti Hillary and Trump threads. Confuse the eff out of everyone.
Thank you for adjusting the satellite. Your selections on pronhub are banal at best.
I thought you were into the midgets?
originally posted by: reldra
Yes, we need more of those threads. I wake up thinking 'why don't we have more???'
They like to be called Little People. That was soooo not PC. That was soooo last month. I was thinking Clinton and Trump impersonator pron. Too much?
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: reldra
Yes, we need more of those threads. I wake up thinking 'why don't we have more???'
Frankly, my last check was late so I slacked a bit. But I got my back pay so I am reading to roll.
They like to be called Little People. That was soooo not PC. That was soooo last month. I was thinking Clinton and Trump impersonator pron. Too much?
Sorry, I couldn't remember if I am supposed to be PC this week or whether it was last week. I do like your idea for Hillary/Donald sexy time. We may be able to repackage it as a weight loss program for additional revenue.
originally posted by: Triton1128
a reply to: Harte
I edited and removed my comment for a reason. I realized it was not the point I was trying to make. There was no hidden motive, in fact when I saw how it could be interpreted.. I removed it.
Back when I first joined. Any topic was accepted. The worst a new member would get was " learn to use the search button " but no one was personally attacked because of how they felt, or an idea they had.