It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: F4guy
You may get a little bit of dutch rolling but the airplane isn't going to suddenly go beserk.
originally posted by: Bedlam
originally posted by: F4guy
You may get a little bit of dutch rolling but the airplane isn't going to suddenly go beserk.
What good is THAT? I wanted it to auger in while trailing black smoke. Or at least evoke a few "Oh God Oh God we're all going to dies" from the pilot.
originally posted by: F4guy
I guess you want to enjoy the liquified brain matter and the bloody stuffed animals that were clutched by the children whose body parts you have to walk across to investigate the wreckage.
originally posted by: Bedlam
originally posted by: F4guy
I guess you want to enjoy the liquified brain matter and the bloody stuffed animals that were clutched by the children whose body parts you have to walk across to investigate the wreckage.
Sounds fun!
Or, in other words, lighten up, Francis.
The concept of a control design in the field that might actually malf in a radical way given a minor challenge such as loss of GPS input was the topic, and is still ridiculous. Any production system that gives you more than an audible alarm and some indication that it no longer has a clue where it is and needs pilot intervention on loss of GPS is an engineer's double facepalm.
Your response of "Oh, it won't actually crash, it'll just roll about drunkenly and you have to operate a dozen manual controls whilst rolling about to get another mode that actually works like the engineer designing it wasn't on drugs" was amusing in itself. THAT was what I was responding to.
“As you know, GPS is ubiquitous. There is an increasing reliance on GPS across all ranges of military operations, and, of course, we can't forget our critical civilian infrastructure as well. Additionally, GPS jammers have proliferated around the globe, from large and complex militarized jammers to cheap and inexpensive units you can buy online. That means that not only that our peer and near-peer potential adversaries are capable of impacting GPS, but we must be mindful of non-state actors, as well.
Furthermore, we are trying to predict other methods that might be employed against our systems, such as cyber threats. Because it is not just a threat against the radio frequency signal, it is a threat against the actual systems that control those. Over the past 20 years, GPS has been a force multiplier for our military. But we cannot assume that any longer. We have to be proactive in protecting this valuable resource.”
The Captain continued, discussing the challenges presented by a GPS degraded combat environment:
“Let me put a little context on top of it. The GPS satellite signal at a user's antenna is very low power. To put that in perspective, a 100-watt bulb is [10 to the 18th power] more powerful than a GPS satellite signal at the receiver's antenna. A low-power jammer can disrupt GPS operations.
To that end, denial and degradation of GPS can have myriad effects on our systems. Without protection, our ships, submarines and aircraft won't be able to properly navigate. Some of our sensors might not function properly, and provide erroneous information to our war fighters. Plus, time and frequency is a critical part of our communications infrastructure. Disruption of time can prevent those networks and communications systems from functioning properly, as well."
So there you have it. NAWS China Lake, which does a sizeable portion of its work under the shroud of secrecy, is likely doing absolutely critical work when it comes to ensuring our combat capabilities are not gutted due to the loss of a single capability—GPS. The Navy would not cause such intense series of potential disruptions over such a large timescale unless the testing was of extremely high importance, and figuring out how we can continue to vanquish our enemies without the help of navigational satellites is certainly that.
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: desert
Well, if it is going to be interrupting GPRS navigation systems, then whatever it is must be some kind of electronic warfare gear. It could be that they are testing a method for preventing satellite data from reaching ground stations, for the purposes of rendering enemy intelligence operations relying on satellite communication from going ahead, or preventing targets being identified.
It could also be some kind of electronic seige weapon. Deploy over target area to mask what is happening on the ground, prevent communications in or out which rely on satellite access, allowing your troops to move through the area without being targeted by satellite guided munitions?
So this magical device is going to stop enemy satellites from seeing what's going on on the ground.
originally posted by: F4guy
originally posted by: Bedlam
originally posted by: F4guy
You may get a little bit of dutch rolling but the airplane isn't going to suddenly go beserk.
What good is THAT? I wanted it to auger in while trailing black smoke. Or at least evoke a few "Oh God Oh God we're all going to dies" from the pilot.
You know, that's not very funny. Maybe you want to come along on the next crash investigation I do. Usually, they don't "auger in." They instantly decelerate from several hundred knots to zero. I guess you want to enjoy the liquified brain matter and the bloody stuffed animals that were clutched by the children whose body parts you have to walk across to investigate the wreckage. Have you ever smelled the odor of the cooked flesh that accompanies the "trailing black smoke" you desire? Sorry I don't share your sense of humor but you don't have to share the nightmares.
originally posted by: mortex
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: desert
Well, if it is going to be interrupting GPRS navigation systems, then whatever it is must be some kind of electronic warfare gear. It could be that they are testing a method for preventing satellite data from reaching ground stations, for the purposes of rendering enemy intelligence operations relying on satellite communication from going ahead, or preventing targets being identified.
It could also be some kind of electronic seige weapon. Deploy over target area to mask what is happening on the ground, prevent communications in or out which rely on satellite access, allowing your troops to move through the area without being targeted by satellite guided munitions?
Christ what an imagination.
So this magical device is going to stop enemy satellites from seeing what's going on on the ground.
How's such a device going to stop a couple special forces recording what's going on, jumping on a dirt bike or vehcile and getting out of there and back in range of satellites to communicate their Intel?