It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: RainbowPhoenix
Here's the point:
I don't care about the sincerely transgender. As people have said, they've always more or less been there. What I object to is when we need to pass laws that make it possible for the "gender fluid" to suddenly go into any locker room they desire.
Because gender fluid people can be transpeople too. So at any time, a person who looks perfectly male can go into any locker room or bathroom claiming a feminine gender identity. What is there to stop him? How do you tell if he really is or if he is just taking advantage of the new legal protections in order to get his jollies off of little girls or women?
Those are the ones we worry about, the ones taking advantage of this where previously bathroom taboos would have kept them out. Now they have the sanction of law and can take legal action against you for questioning them.
2. Safety issues not common
There have been no reported cases in D.C. of non-transgender people posing as transgender in order to access restrooms with criminal intentions, as has been feared by some proponents of North Carolina’s controversial HB2 law, Imse said. The D.C. Metropolitan Police Department did not return a request from McClatchy for information.
Given D.C.’s record of no crimes related to the bathroom law – other than transgender people at times facing harassment – Imse says the safety argument for laws like HB2 “seems absurd.”
Read more here: www.mcclatchydc.com...=cpy
Nondiscrimination laws protecting transgender people have existed for a long time. Over 200 municipalities and 18 states have nondiscrimination laws protecting transgender people’s access to facilities consistent with the gender they live every day. In some cases, these protections have been in place for decades. These laws have protected people from discrimination without creating harm. None of those jurisdictions have seen a rise in sexual violence or other public safety issues due to nondiscrimination laws.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: RainbowPhoenix
Given what women in most of the rest of the world go through because they do not have their own restrooms, I do not trust this. DC is a very small sample size and I have to wonder how widely publicized or known this was.
originally posted by: Deny Arrogance
If the percentage of heterosexual and homosexual men who are pedophiles is roughly the same, given the fact that heterosexuals greatly outnumber homosexuals, this illustrates that men entering womens bathrooms puts girls at a much greater risk.
The risk and discomfort experienced by girls and women greatly outweighs the alleged discomfort of a tiny percentage of trannys and cross-dressers.
Thanks for pointing it out.
originally posted by: RainbowPhoenix
originally posted by: BatheInTheFountain
a reply to: RainbowPhoenix
So in order to discuss your feelings about apples,
You make a thread about ORANGES.
So in order to discuss your contempt towards Trans folk
You make a post with an analogy to fruit...?
I'm not quite sure I got your meaning here, please elaborate. I pride myself on my reading comprehension but I admit I'm just missing it here.
originally posted by: Nikola014
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
True, but my post was mainly aimed at the whole TG bathroom issue, because clearly, the op wanted to make some kind of a point, even though I don't see any.
So making laws that will ALLOW men into woman's bathrooms (or vise versa) based on their mental gender is just ridiculous. It will make it a normal acceptable every day thing to see a normal looking man