It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: shooterbrody
We've also learned that in other cases similar to this, no one was ever indicted.
You guys are getting yourselves worked-up over something that may not be much at all.
The audit found that the non-compliance over personal email went beyond Clinton, and that former Secretary of State Colin Powell, a Republican, also failed to preserve government-related emails when he was secretary of state.
The State Department asked Powell to try to receive relevant emails from his internet provider, but “as of May 2016 the Department has not received a response” from Powell, the audit said.
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: shooterbrody
We've also learned that in other cases similar to this, no one was ever indicted.
You guys are getting yourselves worked-up over something that may not be much at all.
originally posted by: DeathSlayer
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: shooterbrody
We've also learned that in other cases similar to this, no one was ever indicted.
You guys are getting yourselves worked-up over something that may not be much at all.
You could be correct except Hillary had Top Secret, secret and confidential information on her server. Did the other SOS have top secret information on their servers? If so, then they too should be prosecuted.
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: DeathSlayer
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: shooterbrody
We've also learned that in other cases similar to this, no one was ever indicted.
You guys are getting yourselves worked-up over something that may not be much at all.
You could be correct except Hillary had Top Secret, secret and confidential information on her server. Did the other SOS have top secret information on their servers? If so, then they too should be prosecuted.
We know very little about the content that triggered those classifications. From what we know so far, they have classified an email for simply containing a link to a news article about drone strikes. They also classified emails containing information the Clinton Foundation had on their interests in foreign countries. It was not classified information that the US govt had control of and was only classified when they got their hands on it for the purposes of the investigation/FOIA.
The report says the department was "slow to recognize and to manage effectively the legal requirements and cybersecurity risks associated with electronic data communications." It cites "longstanding, systemic weaknesses" related to communications that started before Clinton's tenure.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: DeathSlayer
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: shooterbrody
We've also learned that in other cases similar to this, no one was ever indicted.
You guys are getting yourselves worked-up over something that may not be much at all.
You could be correct except Hillary had Top Secret, secret and confidential information on her server. Did the other SOS have top secret information on their servers? If so, then they too should be prosecuted.
We know very little about the content that triggered those classifications. From what we know so far, they have classified an email for simply containing a link to a news article about drone strikes. They also classified emails containing information the Clinton Foundation had on their interests in foreign countries. It was not classified information that the US govt had control of and was only classified when they got their hands on it for the purposes of the investigation/FOIA.
Now you are just lying.
She was the OCA. She doesnt get to claim retro classification.
originally posted by: UnBreakable
Incarcerated? Most likely not. Forced from office in embarrassment? See Nixon.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: introvert
lol now you are down to somebody else did it so its ok.....
yeah sure that always works for a defense
If you can show where Powell actively sought to escape FOIA laws and show where Powell via email directed anyone to remove classified headers and send classified info via nonsecure network then I will be happy to listen.
Otherwise your defense of Hillary is a joke.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: introvert
And as an OCA what was her job as it relates to information?
Did she mark it unclassified?
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: introvert
And as an OCA what was her job as it relates to information?
Did she mark it unclassified?
If the emails were for private use by the Clinton Foundation, does she have to mark it?
The report said investigators found “no evidence that the Secretary requested or obtained guidance or approval to conduct official business via a personal email account on her private server.”