It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A State Department audit has faulted Hillary Clinton and previous secretaries of state for poorly managing email and other computer information and slowly responding to new cybersecurity risks.
It cites "longstanding, systemic weaknesses" related to communications. These started before Clinton's appointment as secretary of state, but her failures were singled out as more serious.
The review came after revelations Clinton exclusively used a private email account and server while in office. Clinton is now the likely Democratic presidential nominee.
The 78-page report says the department and its secretaries were "slow to recognize and to manage effectively the legal requirements and cybersecurity risks associated with electronic data communications, particularly as those risks pertain to its most senior leadership."
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: DeathSlayer
Now her former team is abandoning her. She keeps getting in deeper and deeper. They made a point to discuss other SOS and the violations they had, but none of them were as blatant and as secretive as Hillarys. The fact that they refused to be interviewed by the IG underscores the problem. This report had to have been signed off on by the big O himself. I think this is a sign of things to come for Hillary. I think this is a signal that the current admin will not stand in the way of an indictment.
State Dept. watchdog: Clinton violated email rules
The State Department inspector general concluded that Hillary Clinton did not comply with the agency’s policies on records, according to a report released to lawmakers on Wednesday that also revealed that Clinton and her top aides chose not to cooperate with the review.
The agency on Wednesday released the long-awaited report to Capitol Hill, copy of which was obtained by POLITICO, providing just the latest turn in the headache-inducing saga that has dogged Clinton's campaign.
While the report concludes that the agency suffers from "longstanding, systemic weaknesses" with records that "go well beyond the tenure of any one Secretary of State,” it specifically dings Clinton for her exclusive use of private email.
"Therefore, Secretary Clinton should have preserved any Federal records she created and received on her personal account by printing and filing those records with the related files in the Office of the Secretary,” the report states.
“At a minimum, Secretary Clinton should have surrendered all emails dealing with Department business before leaving government service and, because she did not do so, she did not comply with the Department’s policies that were implemented in accordance with the Federal Records Act."
The report states that its findings are based on interviews with current Secretary of State John Kerry and his predecessors – Madeleine Albright, Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice, but that Clinton and her deputies declined the IG’s requests for interviews.
Cheryl Mills, Jake Sullivan, and Huma Abedin are among those who did not cooperate with the investigation.
Clinton and her deputies declined the IG’s requests for interviews. Cheryl Mills, Jake Sullivan, and Huma Abedin are among those who did not cooperate with the investigation.
Two information technology officials who support the secretary raised concerns about Clinton's use of personal email in late 2010 and raised the issue with their boss, the audit says. The director of the unit that supported the secretary's information technology "instructed the staff never to speak of the Secretary's personal email system again."
The report gives more details of the under-the-radar work of Clinton’s top technology staffer, Bryan Pagliano, who she paid to maintain her private email server. State’s chief information officer and deputy chief information officers, Pagliano’s direct bosses, told investigators that he never informed them of his side duties. They “believed that Pagliano’s job functions were limited to supporting mobile computing issues across the entire Department.”
“They told OIG that while they were aware that the Senior Advisor had provided IT support to the Clinton Presidential campaign, they did not know he was providing ongoing support to the Secretary’s email system during working hours,” the report reads.
The top technology officers also told investigators they “questioned whether he could support a private client during work hours, given his capacity as a full-time government employee.”
Pagliano took the Fifth and refused to answer questions on the matter before Congress but received immunity from the FBI to talk about the email arrangement. Lawmakers on Capitol Hill have been eager to question him on whether Clinton intentionally used private email because she didn’t want anyone getting access to her messages.
“The Department has searched for Mr. Pagliano’s email pst file and has not located one that covers the time period of Secretary Clinton’s tenure,” State Department spokesman Elizabeth Trudeau said today, referencing a file format that holds email.
“To be clear, the Department does have records related to Mr. Pagliano and we are working with Congress and [Freedom of Information Act] requesters to provide relevant material. The Department has located a pst from Mr. Pagliano’s recent work at the Department as a contractor, but the files are from after Secretary Clinton left the Department," Trudeau added.
originally posted by: SlapMonkey
a reply to: DeathSlayer
I think that her days are numbered as well, but will they number less that the amount of time before the election, or will they expire after? If she were to get into office, it'd be hard to get her out.
But I don't know...what does the constitution say about a president getting incarcerated while in office?
originally posted by: DeathSlayer
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: DeathSlayer
Now her former team is abandoning her. She keeps getting in deeper and deeper. They made a point to discuss other SOS and the violations they had, but none of them were as blatant and as secretive as Hillarys. The fact that they refused to be interviewed by the IG underscores the problem. This report had to have been signed off on by the big O himself. I think this is a sign of things to come for Hillary. I think this is a signal that the current admin will not stand in the way of an indictment.
I agree. I believe the FBI has finished its investigation and has been told to hold off its results... by whom? I can only speculate and Loretta Lynch will be no help to CLINTON unless she too wants to be dragged through the mud.
IMO the Clinton's will definetley be in the history books as one of the greatest 20th/21st century criminals.
But I don't know...what does the constitution say about a president getting incarcerated while in office?
...it’s extremely unlikely, bordering the impossible, that a sitting President of the United States could or would be arrested for a criminal act by a law enforcement official. At best, the President would resign and the matter would be explored to determine if he could indeed prosecuted after his resignation.
originally posted by: DeathSlayer
originally posted by: SlapMonkey
a reply to: DeathSlayer
I think that her days are numbered as well, but will they number less that the amount of time before the election, or will they expire after? If she were to get into office, it'd be hard to get her out.
But I don't know...what does the constitution say about a president getting incarcerated while in office?
Impeach the president......... and this would remove the criminal from office. Then he/she would hope for a presidential pardon otherwise stand trial for your crimes....
originally posted by: jimmyx
originally posted by: DeathSlayer
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: DeathSlayer
Now her former team is abandoning her. She keeps getting in deeper and deeper. They made a point to discuss other SOS and the violations they had, but none of them were as blatant and as secretive as Hillarys. The fact that they refused to be interviewed by the IG underscores the problem. This report had to have been signed off on by the big O himself. I think this is a sign of things to come for Hillary. I think this is a signal that the current admin will not stand in the way of an indictment.
I agree. I believe the FBI has finished its investigation and has been told to hold off its results... by whom? I can only speculate and Loretta Lynch will be no help to CLINTON unless she too wants to be dragged through the mud.
IMO the Clinton's will definetley be in the history books as one of the greatest 20th/21st century criminals.
no they won't, only in the minds of the right-wingers