Why Hillary Clinton is sinking faster than the Titanic

a reply to: Gazrok

Give me a f-r-i-g-g-i-n break... it absolutely is rigged...

Case in point:
1)Look up Trump and his dealings with "Resorts International".
2)Look up recent emails from the Rothschilds to Hillary.

It is not pure coincidences that these two candidates are the official nominees for their parties.

This is coming from someone truly unbiased. I don't give a flying s-h-i-t who the stupid Americans elect as their leader...

a reply to: jimmyx

Isn't that how left wing works also? They find an unreliable "conservative" or right-wing source and they use it to show how all republicans are nut jobs.

I still can't believe people aren't fed up with the left vs right paradigm. It seems like some sort of eternal ying-yang conflict for distraction and disruption. Preventing good things from getting done.

Maybe thats just our eternal human nature though. Operating in extremes.

a reply to: anotherdaytoday

Yup! It's a joke and I'm assuming that the powers that be want to keep it that way. Eternal conflict. Eternal strife and misery. The greater the distance between poor and rich. Suffering and Well-Being.

a reply to: carewemust

Think about it. Think about a thirty year career lawyer, senator secy of state. Would she have ever had such a career if she messed everything up? No. That statement is a lie.

It is not pure coincidences that these two candidates are the official nominees for their parties.

Then ask yourself this......

"Why would the GOP completely pull out all the stops to sabotage Trump, if he was a true establishment candidate?"

It would have made far more sense to simply support the front-runner from jump (and then stay hidden in the shadows).
Instead, they basically did all but come out in the open once their candidate (Cruz) was losing, in order to stop Trump.

If all for show. Why? It simply doesn't make sense, if they already had it in the bag, so clearly, they didn't (and don't).

a reply to: UKTruth

Sorry but every sane person on the planet knows to leave nukes off the table. Mutually insured destruction and all that. Jesus wept.

a reply to: Sillyolme

Yea, that seems like a sleezy republican ad hominem attack. Look at Trump, hes a greedy racist scumbag! O bernie, the communist?! You mean, clinton? The lady that can't even use the right emails!

This is what a elections have come down to, for the most of society. A high school popularity contest.

Sorry but every sane person on the planet knows to leave nukes off the table. Mutually insured destruction and all that. Jesus wept

MAD isn't what it used to be.

For one thing, we've kept our missiles much more up to date (overall) than either the Russians or the Chinese.

For another, we've slowly built up a massive, global, ballistic missile defense system to take out inbounds at each stage of the process. (sure, not exactly easy to test how effective it would be, but that uncertainty goes for the enemy as well).....

Finally, to take out the US, there are a LOT more targets, as it is very de-centralized (like attacking 50 different countries), whereas a relatively few targets would cripple other enemies.

It makes the nuclear option much more viable (if not still highly distasteful).

Don't get me wrong, Russia has come up with some sexy new stealth missiles, just like we have too...but it's a numbers game, and we spend a LOT more on it.

a reply to: blueman12

Another one bites the dust.

a reply to: Gazrok

If you seriously don't think that Trump is an establishment candidate then I don't know what to tell you. You are simply delusional if you don't think he's an establishment candidate. He has been hinting at running for president for quite a while... long enough for the actual powers that be to get behind him as they would with any other would be puppet/slave

Anyone remember this??? en.wikipedia.org...

You have just forgot. The way everyone on the other side of the polarized political snowball has forgot all of the stupid # that Hillary has said over the years. You have your head up your own a-s-s or too far up Trumps a-s-s too far to see the truth.

Here is a timeline of Trump's history in politics:

1987-1988: Trump considers a run for president, while simultaneously juggling large debts stemming from his purchase of the Taj Mahal casino (purchased from none other than de Rothschild!!!!!!!!! LOLOLOLOL)

2000: Trump enters the presidential race as a Reform Party candidate and receives more than 15,000 votes in the party's California primary.

2003-2004: Trump begins hosting the reality show The Apprentice on NBC, which he also executive-produces. He again mulls a run for president, but ultimately decides not to join the race.
How to run for president, according to Donald Trump

March 2011: A Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll shows Trump leading all presidential contenders, including Mitt Romney.

April 2011: Amid more research polls indicating that he would be the preferred Republican presidential candidate among voters, Trump repeatedly calls for President Obama to release his long-form birth certificate, questioning whether Obama was actually born in the United States. (Obama eventually complies and releases the birth certificate.)

May 2011: Trump officially announces that he will not run for president.

February 2012: Trump endorses Republican candidate Mitt Romney for president.

2013: Trump forms a presidential exploratory committee and, despite a strong backing from Republican voters, announces that he has no interest in running for governor of New York in 2014.

February 2015: Trump decides not to renew his Apprentice contract, fueling speculation that he's mulling a run for president.

June 2015: Trump formally announces that he's running for president in a speech delivered from Trump Tower in New York City. Almost immediately, corporations and individuals that have partnerships with Trump - including Macy's, NBC and Univision - begin to sever ties with the mogul because of disparaging comments he made about Mexicans in the speech announcing his candidacy.

July 2015: Trump comes under fire after revealing Republican rival Lindsey Graham's phone number of live TV and criticizing John McCain for being a prisoner of war in Vietnam.

If the Republican's didn't want him elected then he wouldn't have been elected. You really think that's how works? LOL. His competition was a joke. You will see the climate change drastically such that Republicans will be oh so certain that Trump was their only chance to beat Hillary LOL. Anyone who doesn't see this coming before the fake showdown versus Hillary is delusional. If you really don't think the timeline above is enough time for Trump to gather support from the covert banker's faction that runs the world then well then up wrong!

Trump is there to make Hillary look like a good choice and he is also there just in case Hillary doesn't actually get elected. Fake election. Courtesey of your great american two-party system that pits the public against each other as if they were betting on sports teams.

originally posted by: Nexttimemaybe
The Russians having the emails is a lie, so if they can't even get that fact straight......

Sad the majority of the imbeciles on this board are no more informed than the general public and have no idea that the emails have been publicly viewable for months. You are all too caught up in the "Presidential Race" LOL

originally posted by: blueman12
a reply to: jimmyx

Isn't that how left wing works also? They find an unreliable "conservative" or right-wing source and they use it to show how all republicans are nut jobs.

I still can't believe people aren't fed up with the left vs right paradigm. It seems like some sort of eternal ying-yang conflict for distraction and disruption. Preventing good things from getting done.

Maybe thats just our eternal human nature though. Operating in extremes.

Exactly. The two-party system serves it's purpose for the powers that be. It works perfect for them to polarize the public to the necessary extremes and pit the public against one another.

If you seriously don't think that Trump is an establishment candidate then I don't know what to tell you. You are simply delusional if you don't think he's an establishment candidate

And Hillary isn't?

And no, again, if he was an establishment candidate, they wouldn't have tried so hard, exposing themselves in the process, to thwart it. They would have simply supported him. Simple as that. Just because he's dealt with folks, contributed, etc. in the past, while evidence of it, just doesn't stand up to the establishment's actions during this campaign.

And, if I'm wrong? Either way, if you're right, both answer to the same, so our discussion is basically a moot point.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
Political trolling is not allowed.

Then stop doing it. ~$heopleNation

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: UKTruth

Sorry but every sane person on the planet knows to leave nukes off the table. Mutually insured destruction and all that. Jesus wept.

The whole point of nuclear weapons is to leave them 'on the table' as a deterrent. Every sane AND knowledgeable person knows that.

originally posted by: Gazrok

If you seriously don't think that Trump is an establishment candidate then I don't know what to tell you. You are simply delusional if you don't think he's an establishment candidate

And Hillary isn't?

And no, again, if he was an establishment candidate, they wouldn't have tried so hard, exposing themselves in the process, to thwart it. They would have simply supported him. Simple as that. Just because he's dealt with folks, contributed, etc. in the past, while evidence of it, just doesn't stand up to the establishment's actions during this campaign.

And, if I'm wrong? Either way, if you're right, both answer to the same, so our discussion is basically a moot point.

a reply to: Gazrok

Yes, Hillary absolutely is an establishment candidate. They both are. You are reading way too much into my words that isn't there. They both are establishment candidates. PERIOD.

I am totally 100% unbiased. I give zero f-u-c-k-s which candidate "wins".

Just because I gave some basic facts about Trump does not mean that I think differently of Clinton. I'm just giving facts.. it does not mean I hold her in a different view than Trump. I honestly don't even think you read my posts or you would know this because I clearly stated that Hillary is establishment which is outright PROVEN in her leaked emails. Simple solution... if you don't want to actually read my posts and you would rather read what you want to read then... in that case at least stop it with the polarized two-party american political thinking.