It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: mOjOm
originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
And sadly enough, this sounds like one who would be willing to turn his guns on fellow citizens at the behest of an authoritarian.
I can tell you exactly when you will know something like that is going to happen. It will in fact be announced to everyone too. Something like what you describe will begin if and when Trump is president and he makes an announcement to everyone in the nation, "To help him make America Great again." Or something along those lines.
If he addresses the populace with a message of "Help me, Help you. Together we'll all Make America great. That is the moment when everyone needs to watch the f*ck out. Because that is when citizens start taking sides and killing or capturing anyone who they "think" is the problem.
originally posted by: burgerbuddy
Btw, Trump is not authoritarian and neither are his supporters, no matter how many times it is said, it doesn't make it true.
He is used to leading, that's what he does, not dictating.
originally posted by: madmac5150
My Belgians both support Donald... good dogs.
originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: madmac5150
The 2nd Amendment would not stop the takeover by authoritarians. This is what I think a lot of people fail to realize.
Who exactly do you think authoritarians are? Authoritarians can be you, me or any of us. In fact, they are most often perpetrated by supporters of populist movements who are convinced that what they are doing, they do out of necessity and for the good of themselves, their families, their friends and neighbors and their countries.
Are you familiar with the below quote?
"Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun"
Do you know who said it and in what context? It was Mao Zedong and the context was reinforcing in the minds of the party loyalists that armed conflict was unavoidable if they were to seize political power.
There's a popular myth about authoritarians dictators that they "disarm" the people and then take power. This isn't how things work. In fact, in many cases, authoritarian regimes have in fact relied entirely on armed civilians to seize power from the former government. In other cases, they have come to power through popular vote or through thing like military coups (which also have popular support).
These men more often than not come to power to the cheers of the masses. They're typically viewed initially as revolutionary freedom fighters, patriots and even saviors. You name for me one authoritarian takeover attempt that was ever stopped by an armed citizenry or one successful authoritarian takeover that could have been stopped if citizens had been armed.
He realized that he and a fellow political scientist, the University of North Carolina's Jonathan Weiler, had essentially predicted Trump's rise back in 2009,
originally posted by: madmac5150
originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: madmac5150
The 2nd Amendment would not stop the takeover by authoritarians. This is what I think a lot of people fail to realize.
Who exactly do you think authoritarians are? Authoritarians can be you, me or any of us. In fact, they are most often perpetrated by supporters of populist movements who are convinced that what they are doing, they do out of necessity and for the good of themselves, their families, their friends and neighbors and their countries.
Are you familiar with the below quote?
"Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun"
Do you know who said it and in what context? It was Mao Zedong and the context was reinforcing in the minds of the party loyalists that armed conflict was unavoidable if they were to seize political power.
There's a popular myth about authoritarians dictators that they "disarm" the people and then take power. This isn't how things work. In fact, in many cases, authoritarian regimes have in fact relied entirely on armed civilians to seize power from the former government. In other cases, they have come to power through popular vote or through thing like military coups (which also have popular support).
These men more often than not come to power to the cheers of the masses. They're typically viewed initially as revolutionary freedom fighters, patriots and even saviors. You name for me one authoritarian takeover attempt that was ever stopped by an armed citizenry or one successful authoritarian takeover that could have been stopped if citizens had been armed.
I have a 12ga loaded with 00 buckshot and 1oz slugs. I do not mess around.
I also have 2 Belgian Mali's that will happily kill you for beef jerky.
originally posted by: Tiamat384
a reply to: theantediluvian
Go Trump! The rise of authoritarianism in America is based more on Leftist groups which support groups of people of very small count, yet outmatch the majority in power.
originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: burgerbuddy
Same would apply to any leader in the right environment and extreme nationalism on the rise.
Just look at what the supporters of all three candidates are already doing in support of their would be leader. Do you think if one of them actually told their supporters to "do what needs to be done" that the fit wouldn't hit the shan???
It's like 3 different cults full of loyal members just waiting for their orders to be spoken.
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: LesMisanthrope
That's a silly question.