Salon's Pedophile Agenda MUST BE STOPPED

a reply to: Gryphon66

Why don't you just say what you want to say instead of trying to bait me into saying something you want me to say?

a reply to: reldra

Pointing out the fact of cultural Marxism is not nitpicking. It is so easy to see who responds violently whenever I bring it up. I maintain that Salon.com is just continuing the assault on morality by posting this stuff and presenting it as "sexual orientation" and fantasy unacted upon.

"The United States has undergone a cultural, moral and religious revolution. A militant secularism has arisen in this country. It has always had a hold on the intellectual and academic elites, but in the 1960s it captured the young in the universities and the colleges.

"This is the basis of the great cultural war we're undergoing….We are two countries now. We are two countries morally, culturally, socially, and theologically. Cultural wars do not lend themselves to peaceful co-existence. One side prevails, or the other prevails.

Why middle class Americans (who once worshiped self-reliance) now shamefully demand more and more entitlement handouts from government? Why our elected leaders in Washington have become despicable quislings slithering around in Machiavellian muck? Why family life and marriage, the very founts of civilization, are treated so shabbily by psycho-babble experts? Why androgyny is so zealously promoted by liberals on every other television show and homosexuality is pawned off as a "Marlboro Cowboy life style?" Why tradition and honor are scorned by professorial elites pontificating endlessly about how America's original moral principles were repressive?
There is indeed a reason why this tragic disintegration of American life's value has swept over the country this past century. It is called "Cultural Marxism." It is not the only reason why our culture is collapsing into decadence, but it is perhaps the most important reason.

It all began in the aftermath of World War I. The original theme of Karl Marx in the 19th century was that capitalism had to be destroyed. It was tyrannical and exploitative in nature. Under the guidance of Marxist revolutionaries, the workers of the world could eventually be made to realize this and rise up in revolt. A "collectivist" and "classless" society would then commence in which men and women no longer strived for personal profit, but for communal contribution, out of which they all would receive equal compensation. "From each according to his abilities; to each according to his needs" was the mantra that promised the ushering in of a utopia for mankind. Naturally what man's needs constituted were to be determined by the superior thinkers and organizers of society. But the important goal was all-pervasive egalitarianism to be imposed by Marxist theory and the rising up of the workers of the world to confiscate the factors of production, i.e., all property that the capitalists had created.

www.thedailybell.com...

Cultural Marxism is a tool of the radical left. Care to deny it? It's not to say that people of all spectrums haven't fallen prey to it.... its to say its a tool of the Left to destroy America and its very deliberate. Salon is Leftist. What can I say.

Sorry if you don't like my style of exposing it. no wait Im not sorry I applaud Johnny Depp as an associate producer and Ron Paul and the others

originally posted by: DBCowboy
People compare pedophilia with types of sexuality.

I formally give up.

Can't argue with people who think that way.

Well, if anyone ever wants me to shut up and leave, just start defending pedophilia and comparing it to homosexuality or heterosexuality.

That'll ####ing do it every time.

No one is defending pedophilia. It exists. It is sexual in nature. I think it is both an orientation and a mental disease. I am not sure what more you are looking for.

originally posted by: NthOther
Normalizing all sexual deviancy is part of the program to destroy the family.

Ah yes, the family.

I lived in the "Family 50s". Everyone played their "gender role". They went through the motions.

It was often like having a job you hated, but you had to do it anyway.

Women played their role, men played theirs - - - often having completely separate lives.

Seriously, what makes a family? Does the modern working mom-working dad-latch key kid make a family - - - while they shove gramma into a care facility?

a reply to: ThirdEyeofHorus

And you said you would no longer reply to me. Sigh.

Blame the OP. He brought his Sheeple Youtube video here. I doubt anyone else saw the Salon article. You feel salon.com can pull apart the fabric of the country? That is hysteria.


I want to keep pointing this out. He made the video. He then put it on Youtube. Then he brought it here. Who are we blaming for throwing Salon.com all over the place?

originally posted by: NthOther
a reply to: Gryphon66

Why don't you just say what you want to say instead of trying to bait me into saying something you want me to say?

I did make my statement; you responded with silliness about ancient mass media.

Which of course, we have had for quite sometime, depending on the definition.

Here, I'll make the statement again:

The presence of homosexuality, bisexuality and trans* identities are part and parcel of the human experience approximately as far back as we have any records or artifacts. It seems just as likely that the paraphilias (pedo-, zoo-, necro-, etc.) have been around just as long.

Claiming that the presence of any of these in modern society is part of an "engineering program" seems absurd, unless that program has been going on for as long as we have records of humans.

Different societies have responded differently to these human characteristics.

Better?

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: NthOther
a reply to: Stormdancer777

It is relevant. Normalizing all sexual deviancy is part of the program to destroy the family.

You'll notice that Spot's fiancee left him? Another natural intimate relationship destroyed by the acceptance of sexual deviancy.

It's planned. It's social engineering.

Who's program? What program? Stormdancer talks about a guy who likes to dress up as a puppy and has a partner who calls himself his 'owner'. Odd, yes. But they are 2 consenting adults.

And fetishes are not orientations.

At least not that I've read so far.

originally posted by: reldra
a reply to: ThirdEyeofHorus

And you said you would no longer reply to me. Sigh.

Blame the OP. He brought his Sheeple Youtube video here. I doubt anyone else saw the Salon article. You feel salon.com can pull apart the fabric of the country? That is hysteria.


I want to keep point this out. He made the video. He then put it on Youtube. Then he brought it here. Who are we blaming for throwing Salon.com all over the place?

I only read the article.

I try always to go to the original source.

I'm not interested in the "emotional grab" or hyped opinion piece.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: NthOther
a reply to: Stormdancer777

It is relevant. Normalizing all sexual deviancy is part of the program to destroy the family.

You'll notice that Spot's fiancee left him? Another natural intimate relationship destroyed by the acceptance of sexual deviancy.

It's planned. It's social engineering.

Who's program? What program? Stormdancer talks about a guy who likes to dress up as a puppy and has a partner who calls himself his 'owner'. Odd, yes. But they are 2 consenting adults.

And fetishes are not orientations.

At least not that I've read so far.

True.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: reldra
a reply to: ThirdEyeofHorus

And you said you would no longer reply to me. Sigh.

Blame the OP. He brought his Sheeple Youtube video here. I doubt anyone else saw the Salon article. You feel salon.com can pull apart the fabric of the country? That is hysteria.


I want to keep point this out. He made the video. He then put it on Youtube. Then he brought it here. Who are we blaming for throwing Salon.com all over the place?

I only read the article.

I try always to go to the original source.

The essays by Mr. Nickerson were published in Salon in 9/15 and one was reprinted in 12/15.

Salon's facebook posted the video last week of Mr. Nickerson's comments.

I thought it was all dredged up "old news" as well; sadly, Salon is continuing to promote this man's works.

originally posted by: reldra

Who's program? What program? Stormdancer talks about a guy who likes to dress up as a puppy and has a partner who calls himself his 'owner'. Odd, yes. But they are 2 consenting adults.

No one's saying he can't do it doggystyle with whoever he wants (except with kids).

My point, as it relates to Storm's post, is that the acceptance of mental illness is destroying normal personal relationships (which it did in Spot's case).

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: reldra
a reply to: ThirdEyeofHorus

And you said you would no longer reply to me. Sigh.

Blame the OP. He brought his Sheeple Youtube video here. I doubt anyone else saw the Salon article. You feel salon.com can pull apart the fabric of the country? That is hysteria.


I want to keep point this out. He made the video. He then put it on Youtube. Then he brought it here. Who are we blaming for throwing Salon.com all over the place?

I only read the article.

I try always to go to the original source.

I'm not interested in the "emotional grab" or hyped opinion piece.

I did too. I meant that before Sheeple made the Youtube video and then posted it here, I doubt anyone here saw the Salon.com article.

I am not even sure half the people jumping on this here did, either.

originally posted by: NthOther

originally posted by: reldra

Who's program? What program? Stormdancer talks about a guy who likes to dress up as a puppy and has a partner who calls himself his 'owner'. Odd, yes. But they are 2 consenting adults.

No one's saying he can't do it doggystyle with whoever he wants (except with kids).

My point, as it relates to Storm's post, is that the acceptance of mental illness is destroying normal personal relationships (which it did in Spot's case).

In the case of 'Spot', he has a fetish. His girlfriend didn;t like it. he found a new partner. Why is this mental illness? It is a fetish. This type of thing has existed forever. it is bad for society just because people can talk about them on a reality show?

I think not.

The OP is 100% correct about the left. They will allow this now and later say "they haven't broken a law", then scream your "anti-pedo", etc. The left's game is anything you are, anything you do is completely acceptable...unless they don't like it. Guns, religion, etc. seem to fall into that category. But yes...pedophiles? Hell...Bill Clinton went to a pedo resort.

Vile and disgusting creatures.

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: reldra
a reply to: ThirdEyeofHorus

And you said you would no longer reply to me. Sigh.

Blame the OP. He brought his Sheeple Youtube video here. I doubt anyone else saw the Salon article. You feel salon.com can pull apart the fabric of the country? That is hysteria.


I want to keep point this out. He made the video. He then put it on Youtube. Then he brought it here. Who are we blaming for throwing Salon.com all over the place?

I only read the article.

I try always to go to the original source.

I'm not interested in the "emotional grab" or hyped opinion piece.

I did too. I meant that before Sheeple made the Youtube video and then posted it here, I doubt anyone here saw the Salon.com article.

I am not even sure half the people jumping on this here did, either.

The video is a Total Hit Piece.

I found the article very good.

The "cultural Marxism" angle only works if the right-wing is even more on board with it than other political groups; at least, most of the criminals seem to be right-wing.

The most notable "celebrity child abusers" are mostly Republican and/or Fundamentalist Christian.

And not only that, but the most notable among them have been the beneficiaries of requests for leniency (Hastert) and apologies because "sins are forgiven" by Jesus (in Duggar's case).

It seems no one is surprised that a dirt-bag like Ted Nugent is a child molester.

So, are the Republicans in on the "cultural marxism" angle as well?

originally posted by: Gryphon66

Claiming that the presence of any of these in modern society is part of an "engineering program" seems absurd, unless that program has been going on for as long as we have records of humans.

I'm not talking about their "presence" in society.

I'm talking about the rest of us being beat into submission with every tool at the disposal of the state, the media and academia (both of which are now just arms of the state, so I repeat myself).

originally posted by: WeAreAWAKE
The OP is 100% correct about the left. They will allow this now and later say "they haven't broken a law", then scream your "anti-pedo", etc. The left's game is anything you are, anything you do is completely acceptable...unless they don't like it. Guns, religion, etc. seem to fall into that category. But yes...pedophiles? Hell...Bill Clinton went to a pedo resort.

Vile and disgusting creatures.

And what about Dennis Hastert, Josh Duggar and Ted Nugent ... and hundreds of other Republicans politicians.

The point of view that child molestation is a "left wing" phenomenon is utterly absurd, no matter how many times it's claimed here.

originally posted by: WeAreAWAKE
The OP is 100% correct about the left. They will allow this now and later say "they haven't broken a law", then scream your "anti-pedo", etc. The left's game is anything you are, anything you do is completely acceptable...unless they don't like it. Guns, religion, etc. seem to fall into that category. But yes...pedophiles? Hell...Bill Clinton went to a pedo resort.

Vile and disgusting creatures.

You share the same hysteria as some others I see. There is no agenda to cause child abuse to be legal. No one is sscreaming 'you are anti pedo'.

I have various views on both guns and religions. I actually practice a religion. Your conclusions are incorrect.

originally posted by: NthOther

originally posted by: Gryphon66

Claiming that the presence of any of these in modern society is part of an "engineering program" seems absurd, unless that program has been going on for as long as we have records of humans.

I'm not talking about their "presence" in society.

I'm talking about the rest of us being beat into submission with every tool at the disposal of the state, the media and academia (both of which are now just arms of the state, so I repeat myself).

You aren't being beaten with anything. Apparently, many of you seek out these threads to promote your own agendas.

Which, if OP is any indication, was to attempt to equate Left politics (and LGBT issues) with pedophilia and child sexual abuse, a theme which has been echoed by many other posters here.