Salon's Pedophile Agenda MUST BE STOPPED

originally posted by: Gryphon66
By the way, for anyone claiming that Nickerson is "brave" for going public with this ...

He clearly says that if a child INITIATED contact with him, he'd gladly have sex with them.

If that's "thought-crime" so be it. Perhaps we should reconsider the legality of "thought-crime" in cases like this.

There is no excuse for threats, real or implied, to children.

None. Period. End of story.

People are busy arguing about who let the fox in the chicken coop instead of grabbing the 12 Guage and making a new rug.

a reply to: In4ormant

Agreed. (Although I know we disagree on some finer points)

There have to be more of us who subscribe to the US Constitution and "live and let live."

Where's our political party?

Pretty easy to here you don't have a clue about how the brain, and thus sexual orientation works.

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: In4ormant

Agreed. (Although I know we disagree on some finer points)

There have to be more of us who subscribe to the US Constitution and "live and let live."

Where's our political party?

B*cthing about bathrooms unfortunately

originally posted by: mc4denmark
Pretty easy to here you don't have a clue about how the brain, and thus sexual orientation works.

Is this directed at anyone specifically?

Or all of us, generally?

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Abysha

The unnatural argument was used because in terms of pair bonding, it isn't a natural expression of what is meant for a sexually reproducing species. Almost every example of homosexual behavior in nature is dominance and hierarchy related or similar and has nothing to do with animals wanting to hook up as a mating strategy which is the expression we see in humans. So we are either misunderstanding the behavior we are seeing in humans (i.e. natural behavior misconstrued to be something else) or it is an unnatural behavior - something we are not mean to do that is expressing itself for some reason.

Modern twin studies tend to show that something happens after birth that has an impact on us helping make us homosexual. Otherwise, the incidence of identical twins who are both gay would be far higher than the less than 20% it tends to be in every major study.

Hate to break this hard truth to you, but if people do something, it is by definition natural.

originally posted by: mc4denmark
Pretty easy to here you don't have a clue about how the brain, and thus sexual orientation works.

How does your post relate to pedophilia exactly?

originally posted by: dr1234

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Abysha

The unnatural argument was used because in terms of pair bonding, it isn't a natural expression of what is meant for a sexually reproducing species. Almost every example of homosexual behavior in nature is dominance and hierarchy related or similar and has nothing to do with animals wanting to hook up as a mating strategy which is the expression we see in humans. So we are either misunderstanding the behavior we are seeing in humans (i.e. natural behavior misconstrued to be something else) or it is an unnatural behavior - something we are not mean to do that is expressing itself for some reason.

Modern twin studies tend to show that something happens after birth that has an impact on us helping make us homosexual. Otherwise, the incidence of identical twins who are both gay would be far higher than the less than 20% it tends to be in every major study.

Hate to break this hard truth to you, but if people do something, it is by definition natural.

So is rabies.

The cure for rabies and pedophilia is the same, though.

A bullet.

originally posted by: dr1234

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Abysha

The unnatural argument was used because in terms of pair bonding, it isn't a natural expression of what is meant for a sexually reproducing species. Almost every example of homosexual behavior in nature is dominance and hierarchy related or similar and has nothing to do with animals wanting to hook up as a mating strategy which is the expression we see in humans. So we are either misunderstanding the behavior we are seeing in humans (i.e. natural behavior misconstrued to be something else) or it is an unnatural behavior - something we are not mean to do that is expressing itself for some reason.

Modern twin studies tend to show that something happens after birth that has an impact on us helping make us homosexual. Otherwise, the incidence of identical twins who are both gay would be far higher than the less than 20% it tends to be in every major study.

Hate to break this hard truth to you, but if people do something, it is by definition natural.

Does it matter? Seriously?

Why I like pizza is irrelevant. I do. Therefore I eat pizza. Why is everyone so focused on HOW we got to where we are instead of WHERE we are.

Stop bickering girls, your both pretty.

originally posted by: dr1234

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Abysha

The unnatural argument was used because in terms of pair bonding, it isn't a natural expression of what is meant for a sexually reproducing species. Almost every example of homosexual behavior in nature is dominance and hierarchy related or similar and has nothing to do with animals wanting to hook up as a mating strategy which is the expression we see in humans. So we are either misunderstanding the behavior we are seeing in humans (i.e. natural behavior misconstrued to be something else) or it is an unnatural behavior - something we are not mean to do that is expressing itself for some reason.

Modern twin studies tend to show that something happens after birth that has an impact on us helping make us homosexual. Otherwise, the incidence of identical twins who are both gay would be far higher than the less than 20% it tends to be in every major study.

Hate to break this hard truth to you, but if people do something, it is by definition natural.

"Natural? "

Perhaps. In the most generic sense of the term.

If a "natural" trait causes harm to everyone around it, the trait is dangerous and should be controlled.

Tendency to rape, tendency to murder, etc.

Homo/bisexuality doesn't harm anyone or anything in and of itself. Neither do differing gender identities.

Pedophilia, while naturally occurring, is the tendency to do harm ... EACH AND EVERY TIME IT IS ACTED ON.

That's the difference.

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: dr1234

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Abysha

The unnatural argument was used because in terms of pair bonding, it isn't a natural expression of what is meant for a sexually reproducing species. Almost every example of homosexual behavior in nature is dominance and hierarchy related or similar and has nothing to do with animals wanting to hook up as a mating strategy which is the expression we see in humans. So we are either misunderstanding the behavior we are seeing in humans (i.e. natural behavior misconstrued to be something else) or it is an unnatural behavior - something we are not mean to do that is expressing itself for some reason.

Modern twin studies tend to show that something happens after birth that has an impact on us helping make us homosexual. Otherwise, the incidence of identical twins who are both gay would be far higher than the less than 20% it tends to be in every major study.

Hate to break this hard truth to you, but if people do something, it is by definition natural.

"Natural? "

Perhaps. In the most generic sense of the term.

If a "natural" trait causes harm to everyone around it, the trait is dangerous and should be controlled.

Tendency to rape, tendency to murder, etc.

Homo/bisexuality doesn't harm anyone or anything in and of itself. Neither do differing gender identities.

Pedophilia, while naturally occurring, is the tendency to do harm ... EACH AND EVERY TIME IT IS ACTED ON.

That's the difference.

We are just all in agreement today.

I might have to start subscribing to the Mandela Effect threads.

a reply to: In4ormant

(OMG. Better you than me. My mere presence seems to trigger the faithful. )

I'm not surprised we agree, actually.

The idea that we all have to be either 100% agree or disagree 100% of the time is nothing more than social conditioning.

The REAL kind. LOL.

originally posted by: PlasticWizard
a reply to: gosseyn

"cured" with an injection of bullets.

The ONLY way to deal with them

originally posted by: Greggers
In my child psychology course, I learned that the only type of child-sexual-abuse more likely to be committed by a female than a male was the act of leaving pornographic materials around where kids could find them.

Sorry that is absolute trash. Dangerous trash to believe at that.
I just happened to catch that very late edit you made where you inserted that after my post and link showing a very VERY different picture concerning that.

www.menstuff.org...

Approximately 95% of all youth reporting staff sexual misconduct said they had been victimized by female staff. In 2008, 42% of staff in state juvenile facilities were female. (Bureau of Justice Report)
More women (58%) than men (42%) are perpetrators of all forms of child maltreatment. (Child Maltreatment: Facts at a Glance CDC)

One in six adult men reported being sexually molested as children, and -- in a surprise finding -- nearly 40 percent of the perpetrators were female, a new study found. (Source Link)

About 27 percent of women and 34 percent of men among the Dunedin study members reported they had been physically abused by their partner. About 37 percent of women and 22 percent of men said they had perpetrated the violence. (Source Link)

originally posted by: everyone

originally posted by: Greggers
In my child psychology course, I learned that the only type of child-sexual-abuse more likely to be committed by a female than a male was the act of leaving pornographic materials around where kids could find them.

Sorry that is absolute trash. Dangerous trash to believe at that.
I just happened to catch that very late edit you made where you inserted that after my post and link showing a very VERY different picture concerning that.

www.menstuff.org...

Approximately 95% of all youth reporting staff sexual misconduct said they had been victimized by female staff. In 2008, 42% of staff in state juvenile facilities were female. (Bureau of Justice Report)
More women (58%) than men (42%) are perpetrators of all forms of child maltreatment. (Child Maltreatment: Facts at a Glance CDC)

One in six adult men reported being sexually molested as children, and -- in a surprise finding -- nearly 40 percent of the perpetrators were female, a new study found. (Source Link)

About 27 percent of women and 34 percent of men among the Dunedin study members reported they had been physically abused by their partner. About 37 percent of women and 22 percent of men said they had perpetrated the violence. (Source Link)

If you would like to discuss, I would hope you address my questions and comments about the studies you cited, as well as address my citations.

Here's the link since you seem to have missed it: www.abovetopsecret.com...


So far, I think your argument seems like rubbish. But I can avoid using such inflammatory words henceforth, if you can.

a reply to: ketsuko

This whole "normalilzing" thing is cultural Marxism... I thought this article out of Australia explains this particular adjunct well..

billmuehlenberg.com...

This is describing what is going on in Australian schools, so it's not just a phenomenon in the US.

Oh I might add that in these types of subjects on the boards here, I've seen arguments that the arguments for normalizing gay marriage wont lead to such things as pedophilia. It seems that was either a lie or a woeful misstatement or likely willful coming from an SJW type.

The suggestion is that pedophilia has biological roots.... where have we heard that before....

Michael L. Brown, author of the book A Queer Thing Happened to America, wrote this in the Christian Post: “[S]ome psychiatric leaders who were instrumental in removing homosexuality from the American Psychiatric Association’s list of mental disorders in 1973 have been fighting to remove pedophilia as a disorder as well, not to justify the abuse of children but rather to say that being sexually attracted to children is not a mental disorder” (September 28).

Michael L. Brown, author of the book A Queer Thing Happened to America, wrote this in the Christian Post: “[S]ome psychiatric leaders who were instrumental in removing homosexuality from the American Psychiatric Association’s list of mental disorders in 1973 have been fighting to remove pedophilia as a disorder as well, not to justify the abuse of children but rather to say that being sexually attracted to children is not a mental disorder” (September 28).
“Scientists at the [Center for Mental Health and Addiction in Toronto] have uncovered a series of associations that suggest pedophilia has biological roots,” the Times reports, adding that more and more people are taking the view that pedophilia is “a sexual orientation as immutable as heterosexuality or homosexuality.” www.thetrumpet.com...

So yah what people said only a few months ago IS happening..... liars or unwitting tools?

Interesting stuff huh... so when people here try to tell me there's no deep agenda in normalizing this stuff in the schools in every subject, I know its not true, that there is an agenda and its diabolical.

originally posted by: ThirdEyeofHorus
a reply to: ketsuko

This whole "normalilzing" thing is cultural Marxism... I thought this article out of Australia explains this particular adjunct well..

billmuehlenberg.com...

No surprise: Bill Muehlenberg

Bill Muehlenberg: Bullying and lying for Jesus. Bigot, Christian fundamentalist and liar. This blog is to expose his vile campaign of hatred and lies against the LGBT community, atheists and Muslims.

bigotedbillmuehlenberg.blogspot.com...

following items necrophilia and cannibalism

a reply to: SaturnFX

I would be uncomfortable for that person to go into the mens room to use a urinal

originally posted by: Winstonian

The regressive left is often disturbing

By "regressive" do you mean progress?

in their authoritarian ways,

How are things in reverso world?...I have been meaning to visit, but I hear Trump has banned all sane people from entry.

but never before have I been so disgusted and outraged at the filth that this culture can produce.

It's not polite to describe the GOP's standard bearer that way.

The newest leftist agenda, is to normalize and promote pedophilia as a sexuality instead of a mental illness. The left would have you believe that it is normal, and it is okay, as long as you do not act upon it.

Uhh..what?????

You have probably seen the newest video of the guy talking about how he babysat a 5 year old girl and then had to "relieve himself" in the restroom.

NO..I haven't...WTF kind of videos are your watching?

This is the new leader of the "Pedophilia is a normal sexuality" movement Todd Nickerson. It is bad enough that he has been making the news rounds promoting this garbage, but get this, HE HAS A JOB WRITING ABOUT IT.


The employer is Salon.com.

He is freelance according to this?
www.salon.com...


So as best I can tell Salon published a freelance article by an admitted pedophile. Who wants the world to recognize and be aware that he has a mental disease and that he has chosen not to act on it?

My immediate thought is that if all pedophiles did this and went public the world would be a safer place? And maybe there would be more pharmaceutical or therapy options to lessen the danger.

AS far as this being a "Left" thing?...Read the news lately?

Maryland Trump Delegate Indicted on Child Pornography (producing and distributing), Weapons Charges
www.nbcnews.com...