It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Kandinsky
a reply to: A51Watcher
Did you take any pictures of the scoop marks? Did you retain the details of the claimant and do any follow-up?
These aren't 'debunker' questions. I'm just curious.
I've read much of the abductee literature and listened to interviews with most of the prominent researchers in that side of the field. As you'd expect, I've looked at the available images of 'scoop marks' too. It's hard to differentiate the images from typical pock marks, inoculation jabs or the range of scars we all have on our bodies.
The 'proximity effect' applies to abnormal psychology within families too. Tourettes, for example, clusters in family lines and so do other psychological conditions. Could it be possible the matriarch transmitted her beliefs onto the teenage girls and they were all unwitting participants in mythologising their otherwise mundane scars and blemishes?
originally posted by: Kandinsky
a reply to: A51Watcher
Did you take any pictures of the scoop marks? Did you retain the details of the claimant and do any follow-up?
These aren't 'debunker' questions. I'm just curious.
I've read much of the abductee literature and listened to interviews with most of the prominent researchers in that side of the field. As you'd expect, I've looked at the available images of 'scoop marks' too. It's hard to differentiate the images from typical pock marks, inoculation jabs or the range of scars we all have on our bodies.
The 'proximity effect' applies to abnormal psychology within families too. Tourettes, for example, clusters in family lines and so do other psychological conditions. Could it be possible the matriarch transmitted her beliefs onto the teenage girls and they were all unwitting participants in mythologising their otherwise mundane scars and blemishes?
originally posted by: OneGoal
originally posted by: Kandinsky
a reply to: A51Watcher
Did you take any pictures of the scoop marks? Did you retain the details of the claimant and do any follow-up?
These aren't 'debunker' questions. I'm just curious.
I've read much of the abductee literature and listened to interviews with most of the prominent researchers in that side of the field. As you'd expect, I've looked at the available images of 'scoop marks' too. It's hard to differentiate the images from typical pock marks, inoculation jabs or the range of scars we all have on our bodies.
The 'proximity effect' applies to abnormal psychology within families too. Tourettes, for example, clusters in family lines and so do other psychological conditions. Could it be possible the matriarch transmitted her beliefs onto the teenage girls and they were all unwitting participants in mythologising their otherwise mundane scars and blemishes?
You're right about "their" interest in those with different genetic composition and those with psychological phenomena going on.
I meant to make a thread about greys but I figure I'll keep it low key and post here:
Through deduction I figure there must be handfuls of different E.t. races that are in the Milky way, capable of FTL. if this is the case, why do we see a prevelance of stories regarding the "grey" e.t.?
My current idea is that a species (greys) are advanced and civilized, and are essentially the guardians or scouts of a galactic community where they observe planets of interest with life, and report back to their galactic council which involves a number of different advanced e.t. species.
Just a hunch.
My partner wound up dead shortly after that so also unable to do any follow up.
The majority of my research files were lost in a house fire close to 2K, which is why I was unable to go into further detail in the above post.
originally posted by: A51Watcher
originally posted by: Kandinsky
a reply to: A51Watcher
Did you take any pictures of the scoop marks? Did you retain the details of the claimant and do any follow-up?
Yes... we were allowed to take pictures and also recorded the interview.
I moved to the east coast not long after that interview and was unable to do any follow up.
My partner wound up dead shortly after that so also unable to do any follow up.
The majority of my research files were lost in a house fire close to 2K, which is why I was unable to go into further detail in the above post.
These aren't 'debunker' questions. I'm just curious.
I've read much of the abductee literature and listened to interviews with most of the prominent researchers in that side of the field. As you'd expect, I've looked at the available images of 'scoop marks' too. It's hard to differentiate the images from typical pock marks, inoculation jabs or the range of scars we all have on our bodies.
These scoop marks were roughly the size of 'coke spoons' and appeared to be 'fresh pink' and the 3 marks on all three girls were in a perfect triangle.
The 'proximity effect' applies to abnormal psychology within families too. Tourettes, for example, clusters in family lines and so do other psychological conditions. Could it be possible the matriarch transmitted her beliefs onto the teenage girls and they were all unwitting participants in mythologising their otherwise mundane scars and blemishes?
Possibly, but perfect triangles overnight on all 3 made that seem unlikely.
On the other hand, here's a case where none of the usual mundane explanations fit the bill -
originally posted by: A51Watcher
originally posted by: Kandinsky
a reply to: A51Watcher
Did you take any pictures of the scoop marks? Did you retain the details of the claimant and do any follow-up?
Yes... we were allowed to take pictures and also recorded the interview.
I moved to the east coast not long after that interview and was unable to do any follow up.
My partner wound up dead shortly after that so also unable to do any follow up.
The majority of my research files were lost in a house fire close to 2K, which is why I was unable to go into further detail in the above post.
These aren't 'debunker' questions. I'm just curious.
I've read much of the abductee literature and listened to interviews with most of the prominent researchers in that side of the field. As you'd expect, I've looked at the available images of 'scoop marks' too. It's hard to differentiate the images from typical pock marks, inoculation jabs or the range of scars we all have on our bodies.
These scoop marks were roughly the size of 'coke spoons' and appeared to be 'fresh pink' and the 3 marks on all three girls were in a perfect triangle.
The 'proximity effect' applies to abnormal psychology within families too. Tourettes, for example, clusters in family lines and so do other psychological conditions. Could it be possible the matriarch transmitted her beliefs onto the teenage girls and they were all unwitting participants in mythologising their otherwise mundane scars and blemishes?
Possibly, but perfect triangles overnight on all 3 made that seem unlikely.
On the other hand, here's a case where none of the usual mundane explanations fit the bill -