It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Benedictus XVI, Papa Emeritus Vatican City, 15. 3. 2016 Sir, In response to your very kind letter of February 22, I can tell you that a fourth secret of Fatima does not exist. The published text is full and there is nothing else. When I said that this secret is not just about the past, I wanted to clarify and explain simply the genre of such words, we can never reduce only on a specific point. It�s an ongoing reality that the Church and the Pope are threatened by evil forces. Even if we can interpret the vision of a specific event, you can still see in it also a reference to ever new threats and dangers that continue. Above all it is important that the call to prayer, which supports and assists the Pope and the Church, remain present after this time. I hope I have cleared your request and stay with my greetings and my blessing. Yours, Benedictus XVI
originally posted by: 2012newstart
a reply to: Apollumi
Fulda explains much if not all. John Paul II spoke before a group of German bishops, say other sources. I can't understand how after that there could still be people in hi places who will continue to deny the existence of the full 3rd secret, after we were fed with half words for how many decades. Did they lie us then, or do they lie us now?
Is it Nibiru, or something else (as aliens, good and bad), or a combination of all thinkable and unthinkable? Malachi Martin said, that not even Neues Europa contains the core element, although we were told by Card. Ottaviani predecessor of Ratzinger in office that Neues Europe nears very close to the original text.
originally posted by: 2012newstart
a reply to: Apollumi
Perhaps the ET Angelic disclosure is part of all that, may be the most important part. Why don't they appear already? You see, there are some 100,000 - 300,000 people online who watch all relevant videos. With hundreds millions internet users in the Western world, that is not so much, even if we do not count Africa and Asia. If the ET come tomorrow, those people will greet them. Strange it closes on the Biblical number of 144,000 although it may not be 1:1 match. How about all the rest? Obviously the goal of the ET is not to come only for the 144,000. Otherwise, they could simply rapture them and let the billions do their own fate. Most certainly that will result in a total war days after the rapture.
I don't know which scenario is chosen by God. Or where on the prophetic line we are at.
originally posted by: Apollumi
originally posted by: 2012newstart
a reply to: Apollumi
Perhaps the ET Angelic disclosure is part of all that, may be the most important part. Why don't they appear already? You see, there are some 100,000 - 300,000 people online who watch all relevant videos. With hundreds millions internet users in the Western world, that is not so much, even if we do not count Africa and Asia. If the ET come tomorrow, those people will greet them. Strange it closes on the Biblical number of 144,000 although it may not be 1:1 match. How about all the rest? Obviously the goal of the ET is not to come only for the 144,000. Otherwise, they could simply rapture them and let the billions do their own fate. Most certainly that will result in a total war days after the rapture.
I don't know which scenario is chosen by God. Or where on the prophetic line we are at.
Here pretty soon America will have to deal with the thought of not being number 1 in the world. We all like to be the winner. It stimulates the ego. Fires up those endorphins. How would it feel to not be number 1 ever again? Perhaps like a rock star who has passed his time. Bring on the depression from what you thought you were before nobody cared. ET would have a similar effect on humanity.
If ET showed up and was way ahead of us in evolution religious people would have to deal with the fact that they are not uniquely God's chosen people. Just like American Indians had to come to grips with how unsubstantial they were in comparison to the Europeans way of life and their truths.
Solideo Paolini declared: “I met Archbishop Loris Francesco Capovilla on July 5th 2006 in Sotto il Monte [name of a town]at his house. Since this very first meeting, during our private conversation, he made me implicitly but unequivocally understand something about the existence of two texts, or at least about certain things not being revealed regarding the Third Secret. When I asked him the question [about the Secret], he literally answered: ‘No, look, since it was officially revealed, I must abide by what was declared in the official documents, even if I may know something more.’ And at that point, when he said those words ‘even if I may know something more,’ he smiled ironically. Since I was there, I was able to see from his gestures that it was clear: there is something more than what was revealed during the Holy Year 2000 [by the Vatican]. But what Archbishop Capovilla said to me during a phone call was an even more dead giveaway. When he sent me his answers [by mail to questions I had sent to him], I called him on the phone, and he gave me the answer to a question of mine which literally was: ‘So, Your Excellency, as regards the two dates in which Pope Paul VI (would have) read the Third Secret, March 27th 1965 and June 27th 1963, which are confirmed by different sources, are they both correct because, in fact, there exist two texts regarding the Third Secret?’ I asked him this point-blank. He remained silent for a moment, thinking about it, and then he said to me, literally: ‘Precisely so (Per l’appunto)’. This is the most explicit confirmation that anyone could give.”