Fox News Shuts Down Comments on Malia Obama Article When Realizing How Racist their Readers Are

a reply to: eXia7

whos offended? Im the fellow that punches such ignorant bullies in the nose with truth.

a reply to: BigBrotherDarkness

Im genuinely sorry big brother, I was working and using my smart phone and its just difficult to concentrate on this stuff under those circumstances.
I went back and reread today. Hope we can still be friends.

a reply to: JoshuaCox

Agenda 21 is a book by glen beck based on some totally irrelevant BS....

Yes Ive read the book too. But while that is fiction, it is based on the real Agenda 21 which really does exist. It was originally called "The Millenium Declaration".
Here it is right on the UN website www.un.org...

And just look at all these neat buzzwords in one sentence....

"Only through broad and sustained efforts to create a shared future, based upon our common humanity in all its diversity, can globalization be made fully inclusive and equitable",

"sustained" "Shared future" "Common humanity" "Diversity" "Globalization"
makes ya feel all warm and fuzzy eh? If you go down the left column you will see a link that says "Sustainable Development Human Settlements and Energy". Those are terms which are part of the total Agenda 21 plan to corrale people and contain them in the larger cities and stop "urban sprawl". This is what all the "rewilding" of various wilderness areas is all about, to get people out of those areas and keep them in the big cities where they wont disturb the wildlife. They want to reduce dependency on cars and instead get people riding bikes. They want to stop single family dwellings and instead have people in these duplexes and apartments. As I drive through a town near me which has an ICLEI in place, theres almost nothing but duplexes and apartments not big beautiful homes. Just because you do not see what is happening doesn't mean it's not. It's happening through a system of bringing the UN plans into local communities. ICLEI is that....

"Land...cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market. Private land ownership is also a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth and therefore contributes to social injustice; if unchecked, it may become a major obstacle in the planning and implementation of development schemes. Public control of land use is therefore indispensable...." (Item #10 in the UN agenda at the 1976 Habitat 1. American delegates supported this policy)

theres that interesting word "social injustice" and the focus on owning private property. What we need to know about this is that private property ownership is eschewed by Marxists and it is a goal of the communist party to rid people of private property ownership. Everything is collective. That is why I laugh when people keep insisting that socialism and communism doesn't take away people's private property rights. It does and we are seeing it everywhere. By the way Agenda 21 uses something called "conservation easements" to get control of people's private property and limit what they can do on their own land. People do accept this because they get some kind of payment for the use of their land for these easements.
Maurice Strong of the UN said,

"...current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class - involving high meat intake use of fossil fuels, appliances, home and work-place air-conditioning, and suburban housing - are not sustainable. A shift is necessary. which will require a vast strengthening of the multilateral system, including the United Nations..." [1] Maurice Strong , opening speech at the 1992 UN Conference on Environment and Development

So theres the focus on eating meat, having such things as air conditioning, and using evil fossil fuels(coal and oil especially shale oil). And there's that word "sustainable" again.
It's "communitarianism".
Berit Kjos writes,

The answer is simple. Marxist economics has never worked. Socialism produces poverty, not prosperity. Collectivism creates oppression, not freedom. Trusting environmental "scientists" who depend on government funding and must produce politically useful "information" will lead to economic and social disaster. 3

This global contract binds governments around the world to the UN plan for changing the ways we live, eat, learn, and communicate - all under the noble banner of saving the earth. Its regulations would severely limit water, electricity, and transportation - even deny human access to our most treasured wilderness areas. If implemented, it would manage and monitor all lands and people. No one would be free from the watchful eye of the new global tracking and information system

www.crossroad.to...
It is the new communism with pretty sounding words and terminology.
Berit writes

Social Justice. Remember the stakeholders that are defining social justice and preparing its standards? They include NOW, Beyond Beijing, social welfare leaders, environmental groups - all the voices that demand the abolition of Western culture, male leadership, and biblical absolutes.

Theres the whole social justice warriors thing people on ats have been talking about, Agenda 21 is where it comes from, not some spontaneous uprising of people who just have needs.
The Occupy movement was just full of social justice warriors who want to get rid of capitalism and wanted their student loans written off and they demand democracy(what they really mean is some form of direct democracy and specifically "participatory democracy" which it states in their websites and demands and which they use as part of their protests and gatherings, you know that odd thing where they would have some one standing around with a megaphone and people around would repeat the statements over and over....it may seem trite but its part of their mechanism. Adbusters from Canada and the Ruckus Society were both organizations involved in Occupy and Frances Fox Piven was seen attending.
Still wanna argue with me?

originally posted by: ThirdEyeofHorus
a reply to: JoshuaCox

Agenda 21 is a book by glen beck based on some totally irrelevant BS....

Yes Ive read the book too. But while that is fiction, it is based on the real Agenda 21 which really does exist. It was originally called "The Millenium Declaration".
Here it is right on the UN website www.un.org...

And just look at all these neat buzzwords in one sentence....

"Only through broad and sustained efforts to create a shared future, based upon our common humanity in all its diversity, can globalization be made fully inclusive and equitable",

"sustained" "Shared future" "Common humanity" "Diversity" "Globalization"
makes ya feel all warm and fuzzy eh? If you go down the left column you will see a link that says "Sustainable Development Human Settlements and Energy". Those are terms which are part of the total Agenda 21 plan to corrale people and contain them in the larger cities and stop "urban sprawl". This is what all the "rewilding" of various wilderness areas is all about, to get people out of those areas and keep them in the big cities where they wont disturb the wildlife. They want to reduce dependency on cars and instead get people riding bikes. They want to stop single family dwellings and instead have people in these duplexes and apartments. As I drive through a town near me which has an ICLEI in place, theres almost nothing but duplexes and apartments not big beautiful homes. Just because you do not see what is happening doesn't mean it's not. It's happening through a system of bringing the UN plans into local communities. ICLEI is that....

"Land...cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market. Private land ownership is also a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth and therefore contributes to social injustice; if unchecked, it may become a major obstacle in the planning and implementation of development schemes. Public control of land use is therefore indispensable...." (Item #10 in the UN agenda at the 1976 Habitat 1. American delegates supported this policy)

theres that interesting word "social injustice" and the focus on owning private property.
Maurice Strong of the UN said,

"...current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class - involving high meat intake use of fossil fuels, appliances, home and work-place air-conditioning, and suburban housing - are not sustainable. A shift is necessary. which will require a vast strengthening of the multilateral system, including the United Nations..." [1] Maurice Strong , opening speech at the 1992 UN Conference on Environment and Development

So theres the focus on eating meat, having such things as air conditioning, and using evil fossil fuels(coal and oil especially shale oil). And there's that word "sustainable" again.
It's "communitarianism".
Berit Kjos writes,

The answer is simple. Marxist economics has never worked. Socialism produces poverty, not prosperity. Collectivism creates oppression, not freedom. Trusting environmental "scientists" who depend on government funding and must produce politically useful "information" will lead to economic and social disaster. 3

This global contract binds governments around the world to the UN plan for changing the ways we live, eat, learn, and communicate - all under the noble banner of saving the earth. Its regulations would severely limit water, electricity, and transportation - even deny human access to our most treasured wilderness areas. If implemented, it would manage and monitor all lands and people. No one would be free from the watchful eye of the new global tracking and information system

www.crossroad.to...
It is the new communism with pretty sounding words and terminology.
Berit writes

Social Justice. Remember the stakeholders that are defining social justice and preparing its standards? They include NOW, Beyond Beijing, social welfare leaders, environmental groups - all the voices that demand the abolition of Western culture, male leadership, and biblical absolutes.

Theres the whole social justice warriors thing people on ats have been talking about, Agenda 21 is where it comes from, not some spontaneous uprising of people who just have needs.
The Occupy movement was just full of social justice warriors who want to get rid of capitalism and wanted their student loans written off and they demand democracy(what they really mean is some form of direct democracy and specifically "participatory democracy" which it states in their websites and demands and which they use as part of their protests and gatherings, you know that odd thing where they would have some one standing around with a megaphone and people around would repeat the statements over and over....it may seem trite but its part of their mechanism. Adbusters from Canada and the Ruckus Society were both organizations involved in Occupy and Frances Fox Piven was seen attending.
Still wanna argue with me?

I have no doubt you have read all of Glen necks books...


The thing is that none of the stuff people post as proof, is actually proof.

It is only "now I know they didn't say they were going to take over the world and kill millions of people...but we know what they really mean..." Type BS.

a reply to: JoshuaCox

See now I know that even with proof of Agenda 21 and it's goals you are still poo pooing me. Oh well at least its out there for others less stubborn to see. I'll give you some time to digest this stuff if you are so inclined, otherwise you are just being stubborn. ( I think I posted the definition of bigotry yesterday)

It is only "now I know they didn't say they were going to take over the world and kill millions of people...but we know what they really mean..." Type BS.

Not only will they, "they" are now as we speak in ways you have not imagined, but I have given you the lowdown on it and now there's no excuse for willfully ignoring it.
and heres the low down on Maurice Strong

2 Ibid. Maurice Strong was vice-president of Dome Petroleum (by age 25), first executive director of the UN Environmental Programme, founder of Planetary Citizens, director of the World Future Society, founder and co-chair of the World Economic Forum, member of the Club of Rome, trustee of the Rockefeller Foundation and Aspen Institute, and member of the UN Commission on Global Governance. He heads the Earth Council, which works with the UN to implement an Earth Charter-a global code of conduct based on earth-centered spirituality and globalist values. Its publication, Earth Ethics, suggests that apes, our "fellow animals", should be treated as "full members of the community of equals."

www.crossroad.to...

So Malia is part of the elite by birthright and so she will most likely be groomed. They do this by sending people to big universities the average person cannot afford. So there's that.
I wish her well, but when people are going on about that, the UN takeover is happening. Someone posted another thread saying that people were hyperfocused on the bathroom wars and distracted so they do not see such big things as nuclear disasters and what not. I think that is partly true, though the bathroom wars are really part of a bigger agenda.
The article by Berit also shows the focus on International Law by the UN and the Law of the Sea Treaty, which was explained in a book by a conservative politician...
There was also a veiled attempt to control all the waterways in the US, including water in private property of landowners which includes such things as wells and yes DITCHWATER. I attended an informational meeting here locally by the head of a local chapter Americans For Prosperity, and he detailed the whole water thing and the impact it would have on private landowners. Around here that is big because of the rural agriculture and cattle ranches.
People are angry and that's why you have the Bundy ranch stand off and the Oregon standoff which actually involves mining rights.... and that is why people are angry at the President and his family.
Despite the focus on "racism" which Progressives always want to boil it down to, while yes there may still be some actual racism, the flames have been fanned by radical groups and activists, and the people are getting more angry their liberties are being encroached. For nearly 8 years the encroachment on our liberties has been trivialized by radicals and the anger of the people reduced to accusations of racism.
We are all slaves of the system even if we are partially content in our current lifestyle.

originally posted by: ThirdEyeofHorus
a reply to: JoshuaCox

See now I know that even with proof of Agenda 21 and it's goals you are still poo pooing me. Oh well at least its out there for others less stubborn to see.

What proof??? That a bunch of "buzz words" that don't inherently mean anything by themselves, are proof of some vast conspiracy to what???

It is the exact same as the illuminati symbolism BS...

"Sure that looks like it is the run of the mill pyramid, but we know what it really means...."

It is just silly...

All that UN page said, because I actually read it...was that do to technology we are more connected then ever, and now have the ability to address issues that were out of reach before...

The ONLY reason you veiw all the words you listed as inherently evil, is because you have bought into all the conservative propaganda that is the laughing stock of everyone not an American conservative...

Globalism is only global trade and travel...

Climate change is only a vast conspiracy by conservatives...

Half of every economy is socialism...by definition state paid police, fire, army, Medicare, interstate systems, welfare and dozens more are socialism...any time tax payer dollars go to the benefit of everyone is the definition of socialism.

Communism nor any other government system isn't inherently evil either... King author in charge of a monarchy would be paradise, but we know what happens when you DEMOCRATICALLY elect a Hitler..


All of these things are tools TOTALLY dependent on the people in charge as to if it is good or evil. Fox News types have just brainwashed people into inherently HATING anything they point to and call one of their buzz words (socialism,exc)...

"don't actually think about whatever policy...noooo...if I point at something and call it (X). Then your supposed to hate it!"

a reply to: JoshuaCox

Look Joshua, Ive given you the UN website already....
Here's the UN Sustainable Development AGENDA 21 website with AGENDA 21 written right on it

sustainabledevelopment.un.org...

United Nations Conference on Environment & Development Rio de Janerio, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992
AGENDA 21

And she says there that President Bush signed on to it in 1992 at the Rio Summit..... so now you know that I do not adore the Bush family


What now?

and before you go all thinking that this is only a right wing conservative knee jerk thing....lets try Rosa Koire a liberal democrat self proclaimed lesbian www.democratsagainstunagenda21.com...

Now what?
Crickets

they have already called it communitarianism....its just green is the new red
They also call it GLOBAL GOVERNANCE in their own literature. Do I have to yell it out?????

rickwells.us...

Communist China’s Xi Calls For NWO Global Governance Reform, New Int’l Rules, Greater UN Oversight

He elaborated that reform at the global level involves “laying down rules for the international order and international mechanisms” as well as “deciding in which direction the world will head.”

aka George Bush sr's New World Order, and many others who have stated it out loud including George Soros and Henry Kissinger.
Call what you like..... if you hate the word communism then lets just call it what it is A New World Order.
www.bibliotecapleyades.net...

"The people could be made to accept the most flagrant violations of reality, because they never fully grasped the enormity of what was demanded of them, and were not sufficiently interested in public events to notice what was happening." George Orwell

author 1984

There now Ive put it altogether for you....
Now world players on the stage.... is anybody surprised the President's daughter goes to one of the biggest Ivy League Universities in the world? After all, how dare some two bit person like Sarah Palin try to be a vice President with only her cobbled together unIVY degree?
Oh and here's another great little tidbit from that last page:

Julian Huxley was the prime mover of UNESCO and served as its first Director-General. Huxley had served on Britain’s Population Investigation Commission before World War II and was vice president of the Eugenics Society from 1937 to 1944.

www.bibliotecapleyades.net...

Eugenics!!! Isn't that another term for racism and depopulation?

originally posted by: ThirdEyeofHorus
a reply to: JoshuaCox

Look Joshua, Ive given you the UN website already....
Here's the UN Sustainable Development AGENDA 21 website with AGENDA 21 written right on it

sustainabledevelopment.un.org...

United Nations Conference on Environment & Development Rio de Janerio, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992
AGENDA 21

And she says there that President Bush signed on to it in 1992 at the Rio Summit..... so now you know that I do not adore the Bush family


What now?

and before you go all thinking that this is only a right wing conservative knee jerk thing....lets try Rosa Koire a liberal democrat self proclaimed lesbian www.democratsagainstunagenda21.com...

Now what?
Crickets

they have already called it communitarianism....its just green is the new red
They also call it GLOBAL GOVERNANCE in their own literature. Do I have to yell it out?????

I'm not reading a 350 page report just to find out it says..

"Hey we have to protect and find a way to make our civilized lives sustainable.."



Here is what agenda 21 actually is...to anyone not an American conservative...

"Agenda 21 is a voluntary action plan that offers suggestions for sustainable ways local, state and national governments can combat poverty and pollution and conserve natural resources in the 21st century. (That’s where the '21’ comes from. Get it?) 178 governments—including the U.S. led by then-President George H.W. Bush—voted to adopt the program which is, again, not legally binding in any way, at the 1992 U.N. Conference on Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro."

Source

www.thedailybeast.com...



It is a TOTTALLY non bindin (aka BS) action plan put in place by the most conservative president since Regean!!!

Again the only reason you even think globalism, socialism exc is evil, is because you believe the lies of a very small group of idiots after click bait...

a reply to: ThirdEyeofHorus

No way you just posted a source from biblicalapocalpse.com and you expect me to take any of this seriously...

I can post DOZENS of actual news sources...

a reply to: ThirdEyeofHorus

I read 5 min of the democrats against agenda 21, and could tell instantly, no democrat created it. It is nothing but conservative buzzwords that democrats don't buy...

A democrat that believed would attack it from the left, not the right...


Hmm I wonder if this could be the real reason for the web site:

"But then you have UN Agenda 21. What is it? See our videos and radio shows at the bottom of this page, on our video page (or search YouTube for Rosa Koire) or
buy BEHIND THE GREEN MASK: U.N. Agenda 21 by Rosa Koire click here

CLICK TO PRINT OUT FLYER: WHY IS EVERYONE TALKING ABOUT UN AGENDA 21?
"


Buy my book huh?

a reply to: ThirdEyeofHorus

Liberals have their own conspiracy theories..they don't have to steal conservative ones...


Iraq war being about giving haloberton the rebuild contract.

Voter ID being to stop minorities to from voting..

War on drugs being to stop minorities and hippies from voting

Exc.

a reply to: JoshuaCox

ok whatever J

Im done here have a nice day

My last point is that true World Good Will has been destroyed by elites with power hungry desires. The last page has some points in it where Alice Bailey of the Theosophical Society signed on to the UN but the author of the site projects on to her the occult base for the UN.
Today it over rides the old Theosophical desire for world good will and has been implanted by the Illuminati which took over the Freemasons from the inside.

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: ThirdEyeofHorus

Liberals have their own conspiracy theories..they don't have to steal conservative ones...


Iraq war being about giving haloberton the rebuild contract.

Voter ID being to stop minorities to from voting..

War on drugs being to stop minorities and hippies from voting

Exc.

Im not going to argue some moots points here. I know about Halliburton. Did you know about the dumping of BP Oil stock by a major stock company that current POTUS happens to have had money invested, probably from his royalties of the book that Bill Ayers happened to have claimed publicly to have written?
yah lets take in the whole spectrum

war on drugs to stop minorities from voting... are you kidding me???? it was to fund the CIA operations
www.globalresearch.ca...

Just as one example above... but go ahead and imagine that current POTUS is your friend
mediaroots.org...

Why are we still in Afghanistan? To keep minorities from voting??? Really?

a reply to: JoshuaCox

Oh please really? Where in the world are you coming from????
... geez what some people will do to justify and promote radical ideologies
Here is Rosa Koire herself
well ok I will just have to post the link www.youtube.com...
Just because Rosa Koire is a liberal democrat you think she could not possibly be against Agenda 21? She must not be a democrat right she has to be really a conservative Christian? Well think again, she is anti Bush....... she says it in her web pages.
You have let your partisan ideas cloud your vision
Im saying it as nice as I can... but Im not going to mince words
Im guessing you buy into the illustrious Nancy Pelosi's "vast right wing conspiracy" theory

originally posted by: ThirdEyeofHorus

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: ThirdEyeofHorus

Liberals have their own conspiracy theories..they don't have to steal conservative ones...


Iraq war being about giving haloberton the rebuild contract.

Voter ID being to stop minorities to from voting..

War on drugs being to stop minorities and hippies from voting

Exc.

Im not going to argue some moots points here. I know about Halliburton. Did you know about the dumping of BP Oil stock by a major stock company that current POTUS happens to have had money invested, probably from his royalties of the book that Bill Ayers happened to have claimed publicly to have written?
yah lets take in the whole spectrum

war on drugs to stop minorities from voting... are you kidding me???? it was to fund the CIA operations
www.globalresearch.ca...

Just as one example above... but go ahead and imagine that current POTUS is your friend
mediaroots.org...

Why are we still in Afghanistan? To keep minorities from voting??? Really?

Nixon's top aid and convicted watergate co conspirator said that was why the implemented the war on drugs..i don't doubt they gave some of that money to the CIA, but they also gave it to every other facet of law enforcement...whatever they couldn't steal that is...

a reply to: JoshuaCox

There is no attempt to keep minorities from voting. There is only a need to keep illegals from illegally voting. Some SJWs apparently are not aware of the difference.... or .... maybe they are.....
So no there is no proof that the war on drugs is to keep minorities from voting. I wasn't aware anyways that non minorities don't do drugs.... I also didn't know that the CIA is Republican.... gee I learn something new every time I come here. Also is our POTUS also Republican or just a tool of the Republicans.... as targeted blacks, but articles state John Erlichman said so and it was also far left hippies and I am guessing radical Black Panthers as they were pretty far left too. I don't know that it was about voting though. I think the Georgy Scwartz people are now claiming it was about voting rights because they want to give illegals the right to vote and Georgy has a bunch of front groups trying to legalize pot. It would be foolish to imagine he is really just trying to protect voting rights. This admin has been actively bringing illegals and Syrian refugees into the States and hiding them in out of the way places. I know that our governor here is trying to put a bunch of Syrians here and this is cow country I assure you, I know people whose parishes were asking people to sponsor some of these illegals and refugees and such and were offering 5000 bucks a month to do it(I mean the government would pay). That's a true story.
I thought I'd just mention that abortion was also to target blacks and the Supreme Court Justice Ginsberg said she thought Roe V Wade was to target undesirables. Margaret Sanger's Birth Control League was also part of a depopulation effort and one of her big donors was the Rockefellers.....
www.newswithviews.com...

two sides to every story right?

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Metallicus

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: schuyler
Like there are no racist comments on any other media site except Fox News because people who visit those sites are so very tolerant. Have you read the anti-Trump comments lately?

Are there people calling Trump a ni**er? I must have missed that.

By the way, what you did is try to deflect from the original premise.

Red Herring.

No, they call Trump and racist and Hitler, but it is all fine and dandy coming from the Left. Extremists aren't tolerant people and that goes for both Leftists and Righties.

Calling him racist because of his previous statements and comparing him to Hitler is not equal to hating someone because of their skin color.

Call me Hitler...whatever.

Call me a ni**er...them be fighting words.

You've been conditioned well. Call you one of the most evil human beings to walk this planet? No biggie. Call you a demeaning term to invoke a stereotype, let's fight. (No I'm not advocating we run around using the N word, simply pointing out the absurdity of your mentality).

originally posted by: Dfairlite

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Metallicus

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: schuyler
Like there are no racist comments on any other media site except Fox News because people who visit those sites are so very tolerant. Have you read the anti-Trump comments lately?

Are there people calling Trump a ni**er? I must have missed that.

By the way, what you did is try to deflect from the original premise.

Red Herring.

No, they call Trump and racist and Hitler, but it is all fine and dandy coming from the Left. Extremists aren't tolerant people and that goes for both Leftists and Righties.

Calling him racist because of his previous statements and comparing him to Hitler is not equal to hating someone because of their skin color.

Call me Hitler...whatever.

Call me a ni**er...them be fighting words.

You've been conditioned well. Call you one of the most evil human beings to walk this planet? No biggie. Call you a demeaning term to invoke a stereotype, let's fight. (No I'm not advocating we run around using the N word, simply pointing out the absurdity of your mentality).

Obviously you missed the point.

Calling someone Hitler is ridiculous, unless they have engaged in a mass genocide. No one is going to pop you in the mouth for saying it.

Calling someone a ni**er will get you a mouthful of fist.

That's reality. Call it conditioning if you like, but I'm not too concerned about your opinion on the matter.

a reply to: reldra

Her greatness will not be affected by thier sad ignorance.

Racists troll all websites, not just FOX news. Though it may be the checkin point for most..