It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: SonsOfTheMeek
No it's not. See I can make declarations too.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: SonsOfTheMeek
No it's not. See I can make declarations too.
Yes, it is discrimination.
Gender is determined by the brain. It is a birth right. It is no fault of the transgender person that they're in the wrong packaging.
As, with my mom who had polio. Did she ask to have polio? NO, but we were discriminated against just like the LGBT prior to the disability act.
Should she be forced to chop off her paralyzed leg to make herself more acceptable to the public? What she actually did was lie. She told people she had been in a car accident. That was acceptable. People treated her completely differently when she told them it was a car accident, then if she told them it was polio.
People fearing what they don't understand is unacceptable.
Accepting everything else about a person, but fearing their sexual organ?
Forcing a person to have surgery so they fit "societies" rules of acceptance is not OK.
originally posted by: SonsOfTheMeek
originally posted by: yuppa
Are you freaking kidding? A Law banning transgender women(passable ones) and forcing them into the men showers and changing rooms is very very bad. You want a Assault to happen so then you can turn around and blame them for it too? Its for Everyones comfort BUT THEIRS and that violates their rights under the constitution. Also you dont have to strip off all your clothes in a shower if you dont want to do so.
Sorry, not buying it. You're fear-mongering based on the fact that "something might happen". If they have male sex organs and feel uncomfortable getting naked in front of the same sex, then no one is forcing them to. By the same token, why make natural born women feel uncomfortable by allowing them in there.
I'll never understand why, with you people, that the comfort of these transgenders matter while the exact same kind of comfort that everyone else should have doesn't. How can you justify one be sacrificed for the other?
I'm all for affording everyone constitutional rights but not at the expense of an even greater number of people's rights. There must some other way we can accomodate everyone.
Go back and read. You're confused.
As to the 99 percent shes talking about letting the minority make the rest of us all suffer. She was addressing people in GENERAL with that line.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: network dude
I see this law as making sure that Two beered up guys who have no morals, don't decide to go to a jr. high female locker room and claim they identify as a female, so their presence is allowed. (in the south, we call that common sense)
You want to deny Equal Rights to a minority because "something might happen"?
It's a shame you always go off half cocked. If you had payed attention to any of my previous posts on this, I think the original law is ignorant and never ever should have been made, so none of this would be necessary. If this never happened, the HB2 knee jerk bill wouldn't have happened, and all the fallout would not be on NC.
We were set up. And now we are going to be forced into complying with anything the liberal left wants or be financially ruined from the kids who need free lunches up, thanks to Obama.
I think everyone should be able to do what they have always done. And I think common sense should be used in cases where someone has a problem with anything.
Half-cocked because of one simple question? I just narrowed down all the "talking around".
You do realize it was Fundie Type Moms who started this by outing a transgender student - - - not the other way around.
Paranoid Fundie Type Moms started this, not the Liberal Left.
"Cat forced out of the Bag" and you want to put it back, sweep it under the rug.
originally posted by: Annee
However, due to the expectation of possible nudity, shower and changing rooms should be based on sex(vagina or penis).
I feel we will need to officially categorize what are standard restrooms and what are changing/shower rooms (laws, regulations, signs and such)
This hasn't happened yet, but imagine a 7 year old girl in the shower at the YWCA with her mom after a swim. Then a transgender person with a dick strips down and starts to shower in the same room.
If a transgender comes in and hits on you or your friends. Tough #. Such is life. Learn how to ignore them.
Tough #
originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
a reply to: Annee
So you're equating transgenders with disabled people or are you just looking to win a point at any cost?
originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
a reply to: Annee
What and have something like this, no thanks
"San Francisco built an outdoor urinal"
www.abovetopsecret.com...
originally posted by: SonsOfTheMeek
So your position is that it's wrong for someone to feel discomfort changing in front of the opposite sex? The whole reason separate changing rooms even exist in the 1st place? Well why is the transgender's discomfort valid while everyone else's is trivial to you?
originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
a reply to: Annee
You'd prefer they piss wherever they felt like instead of a dedicated site with sewer drain and regular maintenance? SF has many homeless people. You choose a blind eye and pretend they don't exist?
Nah, just the privacy aspect -