Something Strange Recorded On The Moon Up Close Footage! 4/26/16

I usually dismiss what I see on this youtube channel, but this video is at least a little interesting. If that's not CGI, then what is it? It appears to be something moving in a crater. Maybe it's just light reflecting? I'm not real familiar with this channel, so it could be a total hoax video for all I know.

a reply to: TheBulk

Interesting! I would really be interested also in how an Earth-based telescope had that amount of resolution to capture such a vid. Thanks for sharing it with us!!

a reply to: TheBulk

This is cool, I just hope it wasn't edited and fake. I'm skeptical BUT I don't really know what to make of it. Looks kind of like a hand/fin waving

It says the video camera used has "800x zoom".
How can the zoom on the camera, have anything to do with the resolution of the telescope.

It's secureteam10. Automatically a hoax.

eta: the resolution of a telescope is limited by its aperture and the color of light you're imaging in. No matter how much zoom, how perfect the lenses, how totally still the air, you can never exceed the limit imposed by physics for finite lensing.

So you couldn't get access to Mt Palomar or Keck and zoom in to see aliens moving in a crater.

Secureteam10....bleh.

Definite hoax.

originally posted by: argentus
a reply to: TheBulk

Interesting! I would really be interested also in how an Earth-based telescope had that amount of resolution to capture such a vid. Thanks for sharing it with us!!

True sort of, since the Moon itself doesn't really have that much resolution in the video, on the other hand, it doesn't have so much obscuration in the way of atmospherics either.
Let's hope that Secure team gives Google the info that it is untouched by them from their original source.

SecureTeam. Although they have at least as much credence as Hillary ( I know , right ? )
Notice the "wavering" screen. They are well known for adding their own "special effects" to enhance the viewer's experience.

"SecureTeam" = automatic HOAX. No need to view the video.

Just to show that it is possible to get a good close up of the moon with the right equipment, and how it looks when not faked.

This is a combination of raw video and individual images processed from video. An 11" amateur telescope was used along with a B&W CCD video camera. The video feed was captured on a Sony miniDV Camcorder.

a reply to: TheBulk

Its a giant moon crab hiding in the shadows

Looks like light to me, swooshing light. Another case of UFO activity in space? Who knows, very interesting though. But what is the source of the footage? If it's official I am inclined to believe that it's just more propaganda; if it's unofficial amateur footage then I am more inclined to say it's a hoax.

The sharp line detail in the small light glitches does not mix with the resolution of the scene. If they were at the same resolution, than the light would be diffuse and you would probably not recognize any expanding "shape" at all. Just my 2c

a reply to: TheBulk

Maybe next time you will dismiss any secureteam10 video as you should have this time.

Might be escaping gas, triggered by a small meteor strike?

1) There are multiple accounts on youtube of Astro-Videographers getting close up zooms on the moon. It's been getting better by the year with technology for video and telescopes.

2) To make sure this is authentic you would need to see the ORIGINAL video, as it is, on the LED screen of the camera, to verify this was not photoshopped.

3) Secureteam.....Not the BEST source.

a reply to: TheBulk

That looks terribly fake. The "alien" movement is just completely out of sync with the rest of the video quality -- it is too smooth and clear where as the rest is not.

...why would the alien know it's being video'd and decide to moon us?

oh. I get it now....

a reply to: TheBulk

WHY?
Why even here on ATS?

Secureteam10....

Why not Third Phase of Moon?
To make the whole real UFO interested researchers look like a bunch of idiots that believe any crap...

a reply to: Bedlam



I remember when they told us that the Hubble would not be able to zero in on the Moon or Mars. Keep in mind that the Hubble was initially sabotaged because spy agencies didn't want it known what its capabilities were. Its design WAS based on already existing satellite telescopes that WERE focused on earth. (Read "The Hubble Wars," by Eric. J. Chaisson, a scientist involved in the debacle, ISBN 0-06-017114-6.

Soooo many people absolutely believe what they are told by others that have an interest in keeping secrets. It always amazes me. However, on ATS, despite the mis- and uninformed, we cannot discount those some individuals that are always emphatic about maintaining the official line on any taboo subject outside of "suggested reading" choices. There is no better example of that program than that of the UFO.

originally posted by: argentus
a reply to: TheBulk

Interesting! I would really be interested also in how an Earth-based telescope had that amount of resolution to capture such a vid. Thanks for sharing it with us!!

A lot of the more modern, wide aperture scopes (8" plus) can do a pretty good job of capturing quite good detail of the surface...if the 'seeing' is good anyway.

The atmospheric shimmer is unavoidable though, it's a consequence of seeing through the layers of Earth's atmosphere.

Even my modest 4" scope can achieve pretty good close detail, if i use a good eyepiece and it's a clear night.