It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Agartha
originally posted by: tigertatzen
Really? When someone says Berenstein, you hear them say "bur" at the beginning of the name? That's gotta be them making a pronunciation error...forgetting there's an extra 'e' in the spelling. Saying "Bernstein" by accident, rather than "Berenstein", cutting the word short by an entire syllable or saying it like that and actually using three syllables.
Although...a lot of people didn't have phonics in school, so that could be a contributing factor as well. I wonder how many people say it that way?
Exactly, and this is why I said at the beginning of this thread that the Berenstain bears are never remembered as Berenstein by Italian and Spanish speakers, because phonemes don't change as much as English. In Italian and Spanish 'a' always sound like 'a' in apple, so the Berenstain bears have always been pronounced Berenst-A-een, with 'a' like apple, so there is no Mandela effect for the bears in Spanish and Italian.
originally posted by: tigertatzen
I don't speak Italian, but I am fluent in Spanish and I can assure you that the letter 'a' is pronounced more than one way, just as it is in English...but rarely is it ever pronounced like the 'a' in "apple". The most common way is how it sounds when you recite the alphabet en Español: "Ah".
originally posted by: DJW001
originally posted by: TombEscaper
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: TombEscaper
Please stop attacking me and just answer the question.
There is no way to legitimately answer your question, because it is based on a false premise.
What do you think the premise is, and why do you think it is false?
originally posted by: Barcs
a reply to: TombEscaper
Maybe some skeptics in here are being jerks. I haven't read all the posts, so I probably missed some things. The problem is, you are trying to paint all the skeptics in a negative light and are just dismissing them all, just because they mention the faulty memory thing often (even though it's still the most logical explanation thus far). You can't call yourself "open minded" when you refuse to acknowledge the possibility that you could be wrong or remembering things incorrectly. An open minded person considers all possibilities, not just the ones they like.
I'm a skeptic, but I'm also open minded, I just wish the ME people were open minded as well to the other side. This topic greatly interests me, which is why I've been doing tons of research and polling about things that have supposedly changed. It just seems the people affected will not even consider that memory can be faulty or that memory is never exact when recalling your distant past. Plus there's also the fact that people lie. It seems all evidence for some kind of Mandela effect is completely subjective because you are going 100% based on a memory rather than an objective truth. This makes it incredibly difficult to confirm or deny.
This is why I'm looking for details, big details. This is why I asked about Tiger's friend in NZ, to get to the bottom of what has allegedly changed and get specific details. IF ME is a real phenomenon that isn't just incorrect memory recall, it would not just be limited to very similar name spellings in English. Berenstain Bears should have changed in other languages as well. If it wasn't poor memory there would be multiple people confirming these same big details that I am looking for in regards to NZ moving or other major things.
For the spellings and pronunciations of names, my research has shown that the most familiar folks with the topic usually have the "correct" memories. I am seeking BIG noticeable changes, not obvious minor name spellings and pronunciation errors. I believe everyone is doing this topic a disservice by only focusing on the minor things like Berenstain and swearing that their memory is right when it's obvious that many of those things are just incorrect memory, especially since the Berenstein thing doesn't apply in other languages.
Lets focus on the big stuff, ie NZ allegedly being moved, mars being closer to the sun than earth, etc. Give us some examples that can't be dismissed as poor spelling or possible bad memory with something similar. That would be a start if folks wish to show this is more than just bad memory. There's no question that a good amount of it is. So lets drop the Berenstain Bears, Reba Mcintyre, Star wars misquotes, and other minor things. Let's get to the bottom of the major things.
And please stop appealing and pandering to fear. Skeptics aren't against it because they are afraid. That's like telling a non religious person that they don't believe because they are afraid of god. It has nothing to do with fear, bringing that up is childish. It has to do with finding the logic and reason in a situation rather than automatically assuming there is some giant Hadron Collider conspiracy, or whatever else.
originally posted by: TombEscaper
I don't believe any ME'er is saying faulty memory is an absolute impossibility in these circumstances; it's just that the knowingness is so strong that that possibility is at the very bottom of the totem pole. This has nothing to do with "ego" or insisting on a perfect memory as some continue to ludicrously claim. It has to do with simply being so certain of some things, that a sudden revamp of what was previously known to be true causes wonderment and confusion.
Let's suppose we wake up tomorrow in a world where the Twin Towers are still standing in New York. And even though you know damn well you've seen them fall a thousand times, and have read countless theses (conspiracy and otherwise) on the events of that day, there is suddenly now no "mainstream evidence" to be found ANYWHERE that they were attacked and felled on 9-11. To add to that, you've got multitudes of other people who have the same knowingness as you, but there are also scores of others telling you that you are simply misremembering something. Now, aside from trying to maintain your sanity, if you would continue to insist those towers fell in spite of people telling you otherwise based on "evidence," would your insistence be coming from a place of "ego" about having a "perfect memory," or from a place of assurance about what you know happened, with a driving desire to figure out just what the hell is going on?
And, there is no such thing as a "small" or "insignificant" ME, if it is a genuine one. The mere Bears' change of the e to the a was enough to topple multitudes of people's views on reality, simply because it shows that reality is not as "concrete" as we have assumed.