University of Alaska Fairbanks Professor Launches New 9/11 Research Project

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: Doctor Smith

Aegis tried to get out of paying the claim for WTC 7.
Here is the document that outlines their opinion on fire collapse with building design flaws before a court of law. No proof the owner used controlled demolition. See if you can debunk the modeling of the Aegis case and please tell use why they wouldn't pursue controlled Demo. Especially if it was all the owner's doing for WTC 7?

Document name:
Aegis - Nordenson Expert Report 2.pdf

Link:
www.metabunk.org...

Don't you read the first page of your own links. Sheesh.

EDIT: One thing I would urge readers of these reports to do, by the way, is to remember the context. These experts were hired by Aegis to make the best case for the failure and collapse of WTC 7 being the result of negligent design and/or maintenance. These reports were likely highly edited and tailored (in consultation with Aegis's litigation team) towards that end.

originally posted by: cardinalfan0596
a reply to: Doctor Smith

Got it. The members of FDNY who stood at the base of WTC 7 and decided that it was going to fall based on the severe damage it suffered are not right in the head.

Here is an idea....go tell those Firemen your ideas. I promise we will send flowers to your hospital room.....

They were told by someone that it was coming down. Many firemen don't believe the official story. Oh. And by the way. I've studied and practiced martial arts for many years. So don't try and intimidate me. It will back fire.
ff911truthandunity.org...

a reply to: Doctor Smith

No, they weren't told anything. They stood at the base of 7, looked at the 20 story hole carved out of the center, they looked at the southwest corner of the building that was all but gone after WTC 1 fell. They realized the building was probably going to come down.

Firemen who were actually there, and looked at the carnage, do not believe people like you. And you can drop the internet tough guy routine. I made a statement of fact. Conspiracy theorists have gone to FDNY firehouses to spout their theories and have found themselves lying on the pavement.


And I see that Erik Lawyer founded a new group for his idiocy...which you have found.....

a reply to: Doctor Smith

Then why didn't they purse controlled demolition as the cause. Because there is no proof.

How does the court case disprove collapse triggered by fire.

It was not due to an improperly designed building. And it sure in the hell was not due to controlled demolition.

originally posted by: Doctor Smith

Oh. And by the way. I've studied and practiced martial arts for many years. So don't try and intimidate me.

What are twelve?

If you are so confident, why do you feel intimidated?

originally posted by: Doctor Smith
I've studied and practiced martial arts for many years.[/quotte]

So you claim....

ff911truthandunity.org...

www.internationalskeptics.com...

a reply to: cardinalfan0596

And I see that Erik Lawyer founded a new group for his idiocy...which you have found.....

If I were you I wouldn't say that to his fireman face as you might end up in the hospital. LOL.

a reply to: Salander

If you look at the bios and records of those who brought us 911, you will quickly realize that you've been deceived by a group practiced at the art of deception.

No one said they were ready for canonization.
But to put your trust in those from ae911 with the wrong degree is worse.

a reply to: Doctor Smith

Yeah not so much, he isnt much for confrontation when he comes against people who know he is full of manure.

originally posted by: cardinalfan0596
a reply to: Doctor Smith

Yeah not so much, he isnt much for confrontation when he comes against people who know he is full of manure.

I think you 3 should put your faith in Erik Lawyer of Firefighters for 9/11 Truth instead of the International Lap Dog Forum.

a reply to: Doctor Smith

Put my faith in a Seattle firefighter who calls his FDNY brethren liars? Are you seriously suggesting that? Take HIS word over that of the men and women who were there and survived? No thanks.


But, again, please let FDNY know that you consider them lapdogs.

a reply to: samkent

Logic and common sense demand faith in AE911 compared to faith in NIST

originally posted by: Salander
a reply to: samkent

Logic and common sense demand faith in AE911 compared to faith in NIST

Logic and common sense demands faith in charlatans like Richard Gage? Interesting.

You need AE911to dictate the truth to you? I just looked at the conspiracists, skeptics, universities, engineering firms, insurance companies, studied the efforts taken to find remains and evidence, and found the conspiracists lacking. Sorry to be blunt again, but it's damning when you got to fact check persons calling themselves truthers!

a reply to: neutronflux

And so we agree to disagree. You trust government press releases, I do not. You trust NIST and the pentagon, I do not.

You trust George Bush and Rummy, while I do not.

a reply to: Salander

You trust government press releases, I do not. You trust NIST and the pentagon, I do not.

You trust George Bush and Rummy, while I do not.

You trust internet postings (many unsigned) from people trying to make money.
We trust main stream sources.

The world runs on main stream sources.

originally posted by: samkent
a reply to: Salander

You trust government press releases, I do not. You trust NIST and the pentagon, I do not.

You trust George Bush and Rummy, while I do not.

You trust internet postings (many unsigned) from people trying to make money.
We trust main stream sources.


The world runs on main stream sources.

Young people and others that think for themselves have wised up and are going to alternative sources. Mainstream media is just too centralized. All you'll get is what they want you to believe. Mainly just a brainwashing tool. Afraid to stray from the official narrative that is often false.

[SNIP]



Mod Note: It's against ATS policy to refer to other ATS members as "Shills", etc.

a reply to: Doctor Smith

Mainstream media is to centralized. All you'll get is what they want you to believe. Mainly just a brainwashing tool.

Sounds like ae911.
At least the MSM is not asking you to for money.
Just how many commercial sponsors does ae911 have . . . . . NADA!

Can you show us one dedicated 911 conspiracy site that has a commercial sponsor ?

originally posted by: samkent
a reply to: Doctor Smith

Mainstream media is to centralized. All you'll get is what they want you to believe. Mainly just a brainwashing tool.

Sounds like ae911.
At least the MSM is not asking you to for money.
Just how many commercial sponsors does ae911 have . . . . . NADA!

Can you show us one dedicated 911 conspiracy site that has a commercial sponsor ?

Yes mainstream is bought and payed for to control public perception. Not something I would be bragging about. Here's some real news you'll never hear on mainstream.



Over 16000 views on the first day. Oh. Now 17,000. I would rather watch this than that crap you're watching.

The issue with AE 911 is what they do with the money!
healthwyze.org...
www.metabunk.org...
screwloosechange.blogspot.com...
www.checktheevidence.co.uk...

The lies and fraud of AE911. They seem more like a corrupt government then a champion of truth. Go figure!