Massive Clinton voter fraud in NY?

a reply to: interupt42

Top shelf response right there.

a reply to: Sillyolme

You're still refusing to address the amusement that she got, so it's clear that you're ok with it.

Are you aware that corrupt slime ball politicians like Hillary Rotten Clinton depend on mindless gullible people? ~$heopleNation

originally posted by: Annee
a reply to: interupt42

More baseless accusations.

Yep, that keyboard can type whatever you tell it to.

Was she truthful about being under sniper fire?



Did she use good judgement with the email server?

So instead of baseless redirection answer those with a yes or no.

My garden and the warm Virginia sunshine are calling me outdoors. I love being retired.
Y'all can whip me later when I get back. Rest your arms and fingers for now.

a reply to: Sillyolme

You know when someone has thrown in the towel when they resort to one liners. It's ok though, it happens. ~$heopleNation

originally posted by: SheopleNation
a reply to: interupt42

It really is unbelievable. They are having a slobbering love affair with a corrupt and vile person who laughed about putting a pedo back out into society to harm another child. It's sick. ~$heopleNation

You do realize that was 41 years ago.

A lawyer did her job in getting a reduced sentence for her client.

That's what lawyers do.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: interupt42

Top shelf response right there.

Agreed , even worthy enough to be posted again.

a reply to: Annee

Ya know, I find it funny that those who would ridicule someone for potentially for "having a slobbering love affair with a corrupt and vile person" are the same people that slobber all over themselves while spitting hatred against a woman that has never been convicted of a crime.

It's one thing to disagree with someone's politics, but the level some people take their hatred for Hillary is absolutely nutty. It's hard to take them seriously when they are so rabid in their hatred.

a reply to: Eilasvaleleyn

So Sanders was born there. The fact is she got more votes than all the republicans together. She won by a wide margin against Sanders throughout the state not just Harlem. Logic says that the ratio of votes per candidate would have matched the rest of the state. Of course I don't know for sure. It was an educated guess.
That will be revealed at a later date.

Something smells fishy in NY:

NYC was a natural for Bernie, despite the fact that Hillary Clinton was a senator for eight years. But it was Arizona all over again. Thousands of voters reported their registrations were changed or dropped.

Only 22% of approximately 8 million registered voters turned out. Clinton won by 57.9-42.1%.

The exit poll indicated a close race. Hillary led by just 52-48%, an 11.8% discrepancy from the recorded vote. There were 13,791 respondents and a 2.6% exit poll margin of error. But Clinton led by a whopping 62-38% in the vote count with 33% of precincts reporting.

Assuming that Sanders’ 48% exit poll was accurate, he must have won the election due to thousands of suppressed votes. Sanders True Vote = 48% exit poll + suppressed vote.

source

a reply to: Eilasvaleleyn

You got that right.

It wasn't exactly what she said.
Because if you quoted her correctly it wouldn't have sounded quite so trite.

a reply to: introvert

It's one thing to disagree with someone's politics, but the level some people take their hatred for Hillary is absolutely nutty.

Its not nutty its called caring for your country and knowing that her supporters which blatantly ignore all her lies, scandals, and bad judgement calls are at fault.

They allow the same corrupted politicians to continue to ruin our gov't with their rampant corruption and their dependency on the lobbyist money. Yet they overlook that.

Whats nutty is voting based on sex,color,height,weight, and race. Thats nutty.

Speaking of what is moral. Hillary was a public defender for this case.

"In the legal system, the highest morality is justice. Justice is only served if both the defense and the prosecution present the strongest possible cases, and an impartial jury decides which case is strongest. If a lawyer believes their client is wrong, and because of that does not present the strongest case they can, they have effectively appointed themselves juror, and in doing so have obstructed the process of justice, and are therefore acting immorally."

a reply to: SonOfThor

I'd say sharp wit. But don't forget intelligence too.
Oh did you think I'd respond to the rest of your biased drivel.
There is as much information supporting her credentials as there is against.
What you focus on is all on you.

a reply to: SheopleNation

You really are slimy. How do you keep from sliding off the planet.
Gross.

a reply to: interupt42

Putting your nasty words in my mouth is a discredit to your abilities to debate.
Stop it.

a reply to: interupt42

You're all over the goddamned place.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: interupt42

You're all over the goddamned place.

Thanks for proving the following.



You couldn't even answer two (yes or no) questions.

Again:

1. Did shy lie about being under sniper fire?
2. Did she use bad judgement with the email server?

A little more about exit polling:

"When properly conducted, exit polls should predict election results with a high degree of reliability. Unlike telephone opinion polls that ask people which candidate they intend to vote for several days before the election, exit polls are surveys of voters conducted after they have cast their votes at their polling places.

"Around the world, exit polls have been used to verify the integrity of elections. The United States has funded exit polls in Eastern Europe to detect fraud. Discrepancies between exit polls and the official vote count have been used to successfully overturn election results in Ukraine, Serbia, and Georgia."

source

So how is it that in 19 out of 20 primaries the exit polls showed Sanders having a higher percentage of the votes than he had in the final tallies?

Crooked Hillary, that's how!

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Annee

Ya know, I find it funny that those who would ridicule someone for potentially for "having a slobbering love affair with a corrupt and vile person" are the same people that slobber all over themselves while spitting hatred against a woman that has never been convicted of a crime.

It's one thing to disagree with someone's politics, but the level some people take their hatred for Hillary is absolutely nutty. It's hard to take them seriously when they are so rabid in their hatred.

I agree completely.

I've said:
~I think she is the most qualified of those in the running.
~I think she has the most experience needed for this position.
~She is extremely intelligent.
~Politics has always been her career (which to me is a good thing at the presidential level)
~She's not a "token" female. She has earned the credibility and knowledge to be president.
~Those in the senate who worked with her were impressed by her intelligence and hard work.
~I am a Globalist (not NWO conspiracy) - - and she has experience in foreign affairs.

I've never said I agree with everything she says, does, or thinks.

As far as corporations go - - today - - international commerce is what's happening. We are no longer an isolated, unreachable, power country on the other side of the globe.

Its like a progressing international chess game - - - we HAVE to PLAY to stay in the game.

Reality sucks sometimes.

"America Once Was" - - - is like the dumbest thing anyone can say IMO.