It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Better real life experience person having done real life work
originally posted by: SeaWorthy
Why bother with medical studies and experts i agree
I guess we should all go with our real life experience and we all seem to have differing experiences so to each his own.
Why bother with medical studies and experts i agree
I don't need to look for published reference for malignant tumor high perfursion, I have an excellent source right beside me! Spouse have worked as a cytotechnologist, those specialists that use a microscope to identify and characterise cancer cells taken from a biopsy or smear and making the report for pathologists.
Better real life experience person having done real life work, than some wannabe medical youtube "expert" doing published studies cherry picking and "re-inventing" what he cannot understand!!!
ETA: Here is the original reference for tumor angiogenesis: Judah Folkman
I guess we should all go with our real life experience and we all seem to have differing experiences so to each his own.
My mother tried all the 'alternative cures'. Didn't do a thing! Not even placebo effect. RIP mom. If something actually 'worked', don't you think the world would be beating a path? Perhaps some of the alternatives make ones 'recycling' less painful than the allopathic heavy handed treatments?
originally posted by: MrBlaq
a reply to: namelesss
My mother tried all the 'alternative cures'. Didn't do a thing! Not even placebo effect. RIP mom. If something actually 'worked', don't you think the world would be beating a path? Perhaps some of the alternatives make ones 'recycling' less painful than the allopathic heavy handed treatments?
I'm sorry if she never tried Dandelion Root.
It's usually PRIDE that keeps people from
using this, since it's beyond their understanding
that something so mundane could be a cure.
The reason the majority is not beating down
any doors is due to ignorance.
originally posted by: Restricted
Treating cancer is more lucrative than curing it.
Curing it would destroy the pharmaceutical imperative to that sector's investors.
Must. Profit.
originally posted by: Restricted
a reply to: Agartha
A dying man, my father, was given three pints of blood and a Neupogen shot two days before his death. You don't give a man two days from death a $10,000 injection to stimulate WBC production. You only treat neutropenia if there is hope that he will live long enough to produce WBC's.
I decline to provide further examples, but I will point out that he received many and varied medications over a period of a year and a half that were not consistent with his condition and they were all ruinously expensive.
The treatment of cancer is a racket. You will never convince me otherwise.