It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: PublicOpinion
"15 years truther movement and yet no evidence for a cover-up!"
What happened to Flight 93?
originally posted by: firerescue
a reply to: Debunkology
What happened to Flight 93?
Impact crater left by wing
sites.google.com...
Debris stream into woods
sites.google.com...
Jet engine being recovered from crater
sites.google.com...
Dumpster holding recovered pieces from crash scene - filled 10 of these
sites.google.com...
originally posted by: firerescue
a reply to: Debunkology
Hardly any debris ? - recovered 60 tons from crash scene - 757 weighs in at around 127,000 lbs Most of the wreckage
was recovered. Plane was badly fragmented - even today can found small pieces PA State Police take cadets to site
and have them do search of a grid as an exercise
originally posted by: firerescue
Cheney may have gave order - Flight 93 had already crashed minutes before
originally posted by: firerescue
Rumsfeld confusing Pentagon and Flight 93 ?- so politician having brain fart and mixing up different scenarios is proof...?
originally posted by: firerescue
Debris found 8 miles ? - Actually distance is about 1 mile, some loser was using mapping program which gave the ROAD
DISTANCE, since when does debris follow the roads. The debris found were scraps of metallic plastic film insulation and
paper - was blown by wind from crash site
originally posted by: firerescue
Problem with any major disaster is all sort of nuts crawl out making bizarre statements
originally posted by: firerescue
All you have is stuff disproved years before......
a reply to: DJW001
Cop-out or not, I'll take that as a "yes, Sir!" Thanks.
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: PublicOpinion
Yeah. Funny moments of cognitive dissonance where things can't be what they are, 'cause they simply can't.
Yeah, isn't it weird how no-one but you can see the word "government" at the end of that quotation?
originally posted by: firerescue
a reply to: Debunkology
Hardly any debris ? - recovered 60 tons from crash scene - 757 weighs in at around 127,000 lbs Most of the wreckage
was recovered. Plane was badly fragmented - even today can found small pieces PA State Police take cadets to site
and have them do search of a grid as an exercise
Cheney may have gave order - Flight 93 had already crashed minutes before
Rumsfeld confusing Pentagon and Flight 93 ?- so politician having brain fart and mixing up different scenarios is proof...?
Debris found 8 miles ? - Actually distance is about 1 mile, some loser was using mapping program which gave the ROAD
DISTANCE, since when does debris follow the roads. The debris found were scraps of metallic plastic film insulation and
paper - was blown by wind from crash site
Plane seen was Falcon business jet on way into Johnston , FAA asked them to make pass over scene to confirm crash
site and get coordinates
So what are the names of the alleged CIA person and pilot.... Problem with any major disaster is all sort of nuts crawl
out making bizarre statements
All you have is stuff disproved years before......
Wasn't it the US Government that conducted the 911 Commission, and printed its report? And removed the 28 pages of which we speak?
Cognitive dissonance is never nice to observe in action....
Therefore at 10:18 a.m., according to White House logs, Cheney calls Bush, who is on board Air Force One, and speaks with him for two minutes. White House press secretary Ari Fleischer notes that at 10:20 a.m., Bush informs him that he has authorized the shootdown of aircraft, if necessary. According to the 9/11 Commission, “Fleischer’s 10:20 note is the first mention of shootdown authority.
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: Salander
Wasn't it the US Government that conducted the 911 Commission, and printed its report? And removed the 28 pages of which we speak?
Yes, and the report did not conclude it was an "inside job," didn't it? The twenty eight pages probably aren't going to alter that conclusion. Everyone knows that there was more Saudi involvement than the government wants to admit, but covering up for diplomatic reasons is not the same as masterminding a false flag.
Cognitive dissonance is never nice to observe in action....
Then why keep doing it?
That is a great demonstration of how well the appeal to authority sways your thinking. That is, if the authorities did not tell you it was an inside job, you are incapable of discerning that fact on your own.
Some are more perceptive than others we know, and some can "read between the lines" and draw conclusions better than others.
The government may have said 60 tons were recovered at PA site, but that does not make it so.
That is a great demonstration of how well the appeal to authority sways your thinking. That is, if the authorities did not tell you it was an inside job, you are incapable of discerning that fact on your own.
Some are more perceptive than others we know, and some can "read between the lines" and draw conclusions better than others.
originally posted by: samkent
a reply to: Salander
The government may have said 60 tons were recovered at PA site, but that does not make it so.
People may say it was a conspiracy , but that does not make it so.
The sum total of events that day are so different that the OS makes sense.
You can't pull off all these conspiracy events in secrecy.
originally posted by: samkent
a reply to: Salander
The government may have said 60 tons were recovered at PA site, but that does not make it so.
People may say it was a conspiracy , but that does not make it so.
The sum total of events that day are so different that the OS makes sense.
You can't pull off all these conspiracy events in secrecy.