It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It's not a circular argument at all.
When a New York fire marshal says he saw molten steel and saw WT7 come down like a controlled demolition. That is key eye witness evidence. That would be used in a court of law as EVIDENCE.
originally posted by: Debunkology
originally posted by: samkent
This is the same circular argument for the past 15 years.
Explosions do not equal explosives.
It's not a circular argument at all.
When a New York fire marshal says he saw molten steel and saw WT7 come down like a controlled demolition. That is key eye witness evidence. That would be used in a court of law as EVIDENCE.
When Deputy Director of Emergency Services Department and the lawyer to the NY mayor say that explosives were going off in WT7 on 9/11.... This is absolute KEY eye witness EVIDENCE.
The only reason we go around in circles on the 9/11 forum is because those who believe the official narrative DENY or totally IGNORE this EVIDENCE and absolutely everything else that goes against the official narrative.
Only a few others were involved in exercises and training, but from a cold start it takes 90 minutes to three hours to fully arm aircraft and get them launched, depending on how long it takes to pull the weapons from the magazines and get them to the aircraft, and how many aircraft you're trying to launch at once.
originally posted by: seaswine
Great googley moogley! Finally the truth!
NOT. None of this will matter, sadly. Just like all the other solid evidence to support the U S. AT LEAST knew something...
Meh, it's time to close our eyes and take a nap anyways.
originally posted by: JaMeDoIt
Just had to add this little bit...
"There are so many flaws in the official US Government’s position on 9/11
that it is sometimes difficult to know just where to start. For example,
the miraculous survival of a passport, used to identify one of the
hijackers, which somehow worked its way through the aircraft’s impact,
explosion, fire, and an 800-plus foot free-fall to be found by a
well-dressed man and given to a New York City police detective at the
base of the twin towers is a standout. The superstar-like ability of
named pilots to go from the controls of a single-engine propeller-driven
light plane to the cockpit of a passenger airliner and do anything
except put it into the ground within a minute of turning off the
autopilot is another – who would ever have thought that the Microsoft
Flight Simulator program was so superlative? And the explanations given
for the multiple failures of NORAD (the North American Air Defense
Command) to have fighters on all four planes within minutes of their
straying off course are individually dubious and collectively
preposterous – only in Hollywood would they have any credence, perhaps
because that is where they originated."
..... it would be a block buster.
Cheers
originally posted by: MrBig2430
I call bs on his claim of viewing " molten steel running like lava...."
Molten liquid steel is white hot and too bright to look at.
And besides, a little bit of research reveals that these quotes came from firefighters working in the basement under WTC 5, which has never been a target of suspicion of truthers.
There are so many flaws in the official US Government’s position on 9/11 that it is sometimes difficult to know just where to start.
originally posted by: JaMeDoIt
Similarly, if there is no wreckage traceable to a 757,
If a 757 had crashed the Pentagon, the wings would have been found on
the Pentagon lawn.
If a 757 had crashed the Pentagon, two huge titanium/steel alloy engine
rotors, each about 12-15 ft in diameter, would have been recovered; they
were, after all, designed to withstand the intense heat inside jet
engines.
If a 757 had crashed the Pentagon, wreckage totaling about 60 to 80 tons
would have been recovered, and, as was the case at Lockerbie and every
other airliner crash, re-assembled
Only one engine compressor rotor was found. It is about one third the
size of each of two rotors that would have been found had a 757 crashed
the Pentagon. High rez photos of this single rotor are available on the
internet.
It is, however, just about the right size to have been left behind by a
U.S. Global Hawk
originally posted by: hellobruce
Just why do you think they reassemble aircraft after a accident? They know why the aircraft crashed on 9/11
!
originally posted by: smurfy
originally posted by: MrBig2430
I call bs on his claim of viewing " molten steel running like lava...."
Molten liquid steel is white hot and too bright to look at.
And besides, a little bit of research reveals that these quotes came from firefighters working in the basement under WTC 5, which has never been a target of suspicion of truthers.
Why would you call bull#e on someone seeing molten steel under the remains of the towers, why would you say just WTC5?
It's a fact, Even Leslie Robinson saw it, and amongst a plethora of others who are not firefighters.
"Smoke constantly poured from the peaks. One fireman told us that there was still molten steel at the heart of the towers' remains. Firemen sprayed water to cool the debris down but the heat remained intense enough at the surface to melt their boots. Massive steel girders were sandwiched in with crushed concrete. Someone told us that they weighed 1,000 pounds a foot. The collapse left them all blackened and twisted. They are among the few recognizable items in the rubble. You find scant evidence of the hundreds of offices that were once part of the twin towers. Most the furniture and equipment was pounded into dust." -Guy Lounsbury of New York Air National Guard's 109th Air Wing"
"The debris pile at Ground Zero was always tremendously hot. Thermal measurements taken by helicopter each day showed underground temperatures ranging from 400ºF to more than 2,800ºF. The surface was so hot that standing too long in one spot softened (and even melted) the soles of our safety shoes.
Professional Safety 2002-05-01 - The American Society of Safety Engineers"
"Two weeks after the attack, the rubble, the Pile, is still 7 stories tall. Below, in the Pit it burns like the gates of hell. It is 1200 degrees, so hot that the steel work lifted by the grapplers comes out soft. I've never seen anything like this" -Capt. Susanne Caviness conversation with FDNY Firefighter"
November 2001 a picture of WTC1's rubble pile,
The steel beams are white hot at the tip.
But then, I don't think I need to tell you all this, you know already...but you just want to mention WTC5 as a dishonest distraction, same way as OSOTC uses distraction in an attempt to avoid anything that might just, and I say might just thus far, tear the arse out of any official story that has been given.
All the while you can reflect on what a spokesperson, (John Gross) from NIST has said about molten anything at WTC, since he didn't see it, however let's just stick with the molten steel bit. But you must take into account how uncomfortable Mr Gross appears....or is that just my imagination?
Thing is, this is not an event that occurred that requires everyone to move on without question, and if that also requires questioning the official story as given, so be it, It should be the same system that can put little people in gaol, can put big people in gaol.