It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: clevargenuis
and your operating on an Unshakable faith in NASA. nothing i show will be good enough as evidence why dont you admit that roflmao
originally posted by: clevargenuis
originally posted by: OneBigMonkeyToo
a reply to: clevargenuis
Evidence to support your point of view.
Post it.
The astronauts thenselves refused to swear they went to the moon. So why should I believe anything you or nasa claims
originally posted by: clevargenuis
originally posted by: Soylent Green Is People
a reply to: clevargenuis
Why don't you instead respond to the evidence shown that the LM had a solid structure beneath the foil, and thus could withstand the forces exerted on it during the mission. Furthermore, if you have a reason (other than "because I said so") that the structure of the LM could not withstand to forces of landing on the Moon and taking off again, then please post some evidence to support that.
I have every reason to doubt NASAs claims. nasas claims are just that, claims. The only evidence for there claims are from Nasa themselves. Circular arguments galore.
Heres the thing. You werent on the lander.
Those who were in it refused to swear that they really went to the moon. That speaks volumes.
would they not put there hands on a book and SWEAR ?? Answer: They were feeling FEAR, GUILT and SHAME.
.
originally posted by: choos
also what part of the lunar module makes you believe that its just a "cellotaped hunk of junk" as far as i can tell its just the outer skin?
originally posted by: clevargenuis
originally posted by: seagull
a reply to: clevargenuis
You have been asked, several times now, to provide proof of your assertions.
Your continued refusal to do so, in fact, constitutes trolling by almost any definition.
Put up, or shut up.
lm not trolling. I'm just not convinced that the lander made it to the moon. I cant prove it *didnt* go to the moon unless I start putting faith in nasa, which i cant.
Why should I?
The West Australian, Friday 18 July 1969, page 16 Russians hail Apollo The Soviet news agency Tass yesterday put out an 800-word story outlining America's moon programme and hailing the three Apollo 11 astronauts. Tass described the three men as "those courageous people entrusted with the most responsible task of landing on the moon." Pravda, the Soviet Communist Party newspaper, wished the astronauts bon voyage. It said: "Let us wish its courageous crew a happy voyage and full success."... The West Australian, Wednesday 23 July 1969, page 8 Congratulations from Kosygin Moscow, Tuesday Soviet Prime Minister Alexei Kosygin sent congratulations to the Apollo 11 astronauts and President Nixon yesterday through former vice-president Humphrey, who is visiting Moscow. Mr Humphrey was called to Mr Kosygin's office in the Kremlin after the moon walk. Mr Humphrey quoted Mr Kosygin as saying: "I want you to tell the President and the American people that the Soviet Union desires to work with the U.S. in the cause of peace." Prompt reports The Russian radio reported the landing of the astronauts within ten minutes of touch-down and announced the ascent from the moon even more promptly. Moscow television showed the moon walk yesterday. Manawatu Evening Standard, Friday 25 July 1969, page 1 Soviet praise From Moscow, the Soviet President, Mr N. Podgorny, today congratulated President Nixon on "the successful completion of the outstanding flight of the spaceship Apollo-XI, the moon landing and the safe return to earth of the American cosmonauts." The Soviet President's telegram said: "Please convey our congratulations and best wishes to the courageous space pilots Neil Armstrong, Edwin Aldrin and Michael Collins." Russian television viewers saw their first live transmission from the epic Apollo-XI flight, as the moon-walking astronauts landed on the Hornet.