It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Metallicus
a reply to: Southern Guardian
This RV park owner should be fined simply for opening his big mouth. At least he is shutting down the park. No more issues.after that happens.
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: Southern Guardian
Oh come ON! What year is it!? 1949?
If they were being evicted because they were massive scumbags, getting all messed up on life eaters (class A drugs), breaking into other RVs and setting fire to things, then that would be grounds to throw them out. But that simply is not the case here from what I can gather. This situation is just straight up wrong. One of the evictee is a National Guardsman for crying out loud!
Giving in to prejudice, his own, or that of neighbours, is no excuse for the landlords behaviour on this issue.
It's a damned disgrace.
originally posted by: Metallicus
a reply to: Southern Guardian
This RV park owner should be fined simply for opening his big mouth. At least he is shutting down the park. No more issues.after that happens.
originally posted by: Metallicus
originally posted by: Metallicus
a reply to: Southern Guardian
This RV park owner should be fined simply for opening his big mouth. At least he is shutting down the park. No more issues.after that happens.
I have consistently let my personal opinion of these people be known. My problem is when Government forces compliance not with the idea behind why they feel the need to do so.
originally posted by: IslandOfMisfitToys
Isn't that also forced compliance?
originally posted by: Metallicus
I have always conducted business the same way.
I will never believe that FORCING someone to comply because they said something mean or insensitive is okay. Forcing other people to take action contrary to their beliefs is anathema to everything I believe. If there is no crime against person or property then there is no crime.
I don't care how someone 'feels' about what was said to them.
originally posted by: IslandOfMisfitToys
Does this fall in line with his comment about the park owner needing to be fined?
Was the war hero black? Was the war hero called any disparaging names by the feds? Then no, its not news...this whole country is f**cking bananas.
originally posted by: TheBulk
a reply to: Southern Guardian
So this is becoming a big story but BLM members beating up a war hero is not worthy.
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: Southern Guardian
Oh come ON! What year is it!? 1949?
If they were being evicted because they were massive scumbags, getting all messed up on life eaters (class A drugs), breaking into other RVs and setting fire to things, then that would be grounds to throw them out. But that simply is not the case here from what I can gather. This situation is just straight up wrong. One of the evictee is a National Guardsman for crying out loud!
Giving in to prejudice, his own, or that of neighbours, is no excuse for the landlords behaviour on this issue.
It's a damned disgrace.