Remote viewing the 911 attacks

a reply to: Informer1958

Well if they are still using it the USA has had a few bloody noses so it's about as much use as a chocolate teapot

a reply to: Doctor Smith

I call this a direct hit.

Major Ed Dames Predicts Fukushima disaster live with ART BEL

He made that prediction in 2003.
Fukushima happened in 2011.

Japan has earthquakes all the time. I know because my daughter lives there.
She talks about them.
So predicting an earth quake disaster in a country heavily dependent on nuclear power is not much of a stretch.

Funny how he didn't say anything about the tsunami that took out the generators causing reactor 4 to overheat, starting the melt down.
I guess his RV eyes were turned the other way.

a reply to: samkent

So true a country with 40 active volcanoes and 1,500 earthquakes a year and a reliance on nuclear power talk about shooting fish in a barrel.

Those nuclear reactors were made to take large earthquakes. That little clip wasn't the whole prediction. I remember him talking about the water coming in.

At the time I thought Dames was going out on a limb and was making a fool of himself. Then he nailed it.

And still their are, those that can't handle the truth. They want to live in their little simple world. Quite amusing.

a reply to: Doctor Smith

Handle the TRUTH you wouldn't know it if it came running up to you a kicked you square between the legs.

When an RV prediction gives ACCURATE date time location then I might consider it as real but when I can see better predictions from peole like Darren Brown on TV it's BS.

a reply to: samkent

OK, I see. You and Bruce criticize those who question the official story for not relying upon experts, and then you quickly exempt yourselves from relying upon experts in your interpretation of events.

Isn't that called hypocrisy?

originally posted by: Salander
a reply to: samkent

OK, I see. You and Bruce criticize those who question the official story for not relying upon experts, and then you quickly exempt yourselves from relying upon experts in your interpretation of events.

Isn't that called hypocrisy?

What experts have we exempted?

a reply to: hellobruce

Get your grammar book out Bruce, and read the post again. I said you have exempted YOURSELVES from relying upon experts, as you rely upon political sycophants at NIST, not experts.

The experts are the AE911 group.

a reply to: Salander

as you rely upon political sycophants at NIST, not experts.

The experts are the AE911 group.

NIST had the best of the best doing the expert analysis for the commission.
Shall we list the jokers of ae911 ?

originally posted by: Salander

I said you have exempted YOURSELVES from relying upon experts,

Still wrong as truthers are the ones who ignore and exempt the experts, preferring to believe people who make up crap like thee following.

The experts are the AE911 group.

We have all seen what the "experts" there claim.... this is the sort of "expert" you believe in, and it shows the quality of their "research"!

originally posted by: samkent
a reply to: Salander

as you rely upon political sycophants at NIST, not experts.

The experts are the AE911 group.

NIST had the best of the best doing the expert analysis for the commission.
Shall we list the jokers of ae911 ?

Best of the best?

Goodness, your standards are extremely low.

a reply to: Salander

Steven Jones & Kevin Ryan Debunk the NIST Report part 1 of 2



Steven Jones & Kevin Ryan Debunk the NIST Report part 2 of 2

originally posted by: Doctor Smith
a reply to: Salander

Steven Jones & Kevin Ryan Debunk the NIST Report part 1 of 2

A good sign that they are posting crap is when the disable comments on youtube - they do not like their crap pointed out!

Like the following....

Kevin Ryan said the core was built first! No Kevin, the core and the exterior had to be built the same time. The video itself debunks the Kevin, it is funny stuff! The core can not stand by itself. The core had to have the exterior to stand. Kevin is so dumb, only the video is dumber.

www.internationalskeptics.com...

a reply to: Doctor Smith

Steven Jones & Kevin Ryan Debunk the NIST Report part 1 of 2

You can buy Kevin Ryan's book here

You can buy Steven Jones book [url=https://www.amazon.com/Nanothermite-Steven-Jones/dp/B01GUP35GE/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1466220372&sr=8-1&keywords=steven+jones+911]here[/u rl]

Like I said they all trying to make a buck off of 911.

Likely because none of these 'experts' have jobs.

originally posted by: samkent
a reply to: Doctor Smith

Steven Jones & Kevin Ryan Debunk the NIST Report part 1 of 2

You can buy Kevin Ryan's book here

You can buy Steven Jones book [url=https://www.amazon.com/Nanothermite-Steven-Jones/dp/B01GUP35GE/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1466220372&sr=8-1&keywords=steven+jones+911]here[/u rl]

Like I said they all trying to make a buck off of 911.

Likely because none of these 'experts' have jobs.

Funny how even to watch the videos about "remote viewing of 9/11" you have to pay over $20,

So just a money making scam!

originally posted by: hellobruce

originally posted by: Doctor Smith
a reply to: Salander

Steven Jones & Kevin Ryan Debunk the NIST Report part 1 of 2

A good sign that they are posting crap is when the disable comments on youtube - they do not like their crap pointed out!

Like the following....

Kevin Ryan said the core was built first! No Kevin, the core and the exterior had to be built the same time. The video itself debunks the Kevin, it is funny stuff! The core can not stand by itself. The core had to have the exterior to stand. Kevin is so dumb, only the video is dumber.

www.internationalskeptics.com...

And your solid source is Beachnut on a forum. LOL What a Joke. LOL

Your little discrepancy probably makes no difference. A misunderstanding on your part. First the steel core is put up. Then the supports for the concrete and the concrete. Then the outer steel. Then you go to the next level. Either way the core had to be put in first before the concrete. Duh.

originally posted by: Doctor Smith

And your solid source is Beachnut on a forum.

Funny how you cannot dispute the facts, just whine about the source?

All truthers have are youtube video's and blogs, or video's that you have to buy!

originally posted by: hellobruce

originally posted by: Doctor Smith

And your solid source is Beachnut on a forum.

Funny how you cannot dispute the facts, just whine about the source?

All truthers have are youtube video's and blogs....

And why do you suppose it's so hard for you to find an intelligent Utube video that supports your argument? Truthers have everything you lack.

originally posted by: Doctor Smith
Truthers have everything you lack.

Let us see, I do not make up stories, truthers do.
I do not lie, truthers do.
I do not sell video's, some truthers do.
I do not support silly conspiracy theories, truthers do.
I do not support 2 mutually exclusive conspiracy theories, some truthers do.

Yes, we can easily see truthers have what I do not!

Also I do not have video's like truthers do, this is a very good example of the quality of truther video's

The biggest problem the conspiracy crowd has is the lack of a comprehensive 911 theory.
They come up with ideas of how one small aspect could have been done.
But it doesn't jive with other aspects.
Thermite because it's silent. Then explosives because of seismographs.