It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: ThePeaceMaker
if he was a CIA operative this story wouldn't of even made the news
Exactly.
Shame many members here can't make that logical step though.
"Zomg teh crises actur!1!"
originally posted by: ThePeaceMaker
Well technically if his mother wasn't running in the marathon he wouldn't of been there how many other people would of gone to Boston they day to watch people run, them people too didn't really have a reason to be there apart from that they were watching the marathon any other day half of those people would of been there
if he was a CIA operative this story wouldn't of even made the news
I just think a case of being in the wrong place at the wrong time .. 3 times
originally posted by: Misterlondon
originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: ThePeaceMaker
if he was a CIA operative this story wouldn't of even made the news
Exactly.
Shame many members here can't make that logical step though.
"Zomg teh crises actur!1!"
And why exactly wouldn't it make the news Mr smartass?
The best way of hiding something is in plain sight.. Logic doesn't come into the equation when dealing with these type of agencies..
What's to say the story wouldnt have broken anyway so they release their version first..
Try and think outside the box.
originally posted by: ThePeaceMaker
Oh hiding in plain site is a great way to hide ... But not releasing or giving out any information is even better way of hiding. If this report didn't come to light how many people would of known about this guys bad luck.. No one. Why realease this report and then give everyone the suspicion that he may be CIA, if this happened his cover is already blown
He isn't a CIA operative end of
originally posted by: Misterlondon
originally posted by: ThePeaceMaker
Well technically if his mother wasn't running in the marathon he wouldn't of been there how many other people would of gone to Boston they day to watch people run, them people too didn't really have a reason to be there apart from that they were watching the marathon any other day half of those people would of been there
if he was a CIA operative this story wouldn't of even made the news
I just think a case of being in the wrong place at the wrong time .. 3 times
You have to ask yourself.. Why is a missionary from utah running a marathon across the country in Boston?
Could be valid but then again might not be..
None of this adds up
originally posted by: ThePeaceMaker
Oh hiding in plain site is a great way to hide ... But not releasing or giving out any information is even better way of hiding. If this report didn't come to light how many people would of known about this guys bad luck.. No one. Why realease this report and then give everyone the suspicion that he may be CIA, if this happened his cover is already blown
He isn't a CIA operative end of
originally posted by: ThePeaceMaker
originally posted by: Misterlondon
originally posted by: ThePeaceMaker
Well technically if his mother wasn't running in the marathon he wouldn't of been there how many other people would of gone to Boston they day to watch people run, them people too didn't really have a reason to be there apart from that they were watching the marathon any other day half of those people would of been there
if he was a CIA operative this story wouldn't of even made the news
I just think a case of being in the wrong place at the wrong time .. 3 times
You have to ask yourself.. Why is a missionary from utah running a marathon across the country in Boston?
Could be valid but then again might not be..
None of this adds up
Why would Eddie Izzard go to southe Africa to run 27 marathons in 27 days? Why would someone come from Scotland to run in the London marathon. Maybe they just like running and keeping fit and want to constantly challenge themselves. Unlike me I'm laying in bed right now .. It's my day off
originally posted by: ThePeaceMaker
a reply to: nonspecific
Ah damn sorry for using my brain
Ok so he is a CIA op and they put this report out so he can hide in plain site when it would of been a lot easier if they said nothing at all.
Sorry for commenting I'll take my two pence back
originally posted by: ThePeaceMaker
a reply to: Misterlondon no no I'm not in Langley I'm laying in bed in Essex I agree thinking outside the box is great but when a more simple theory can be thought of I'd rather go with that. Each to their own though i don't mean to cause offence it's just hiding in plain sight is great .. But not saying a single word in the first place is better
He is just as likely to be a time traveller from the future observing key terrorist events and just stood a little too close this time.
originally posted by: nonspecific
originally posted by: ThePeaceMaker
a reply to: nonspecific
Ah damn sorry for using my brain
Ok so he is a CIA op and they put this report out so he can hide in plain site when it would of been a lot easier if they said nothing at all.
Sorry for commenting I'll take my two pence back
There is a difference between offering an opinion and making a definite determination without suitable evidence to back it up.
I said earlier that the likelihood he was an operative was slim but did not presume that I had the authority to end the debate based on my own personal belief.
originally posted by: ThePeaceMaker
And if he is 19 now ... How old would the son of been at the time of the Boston bombings ... A 16/17 year old CIA op ?
originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: Misterlondon
Oh I'm sorry, I forget, you lot change things around to suit your beliefs.
Yes, the CIA planned to have their 19 year old agent/crisis actor found at these 3 events.
Because that's what TPTB do, isn't it? Hide in plain sight, that's the cliched go to here isn't it?
But when someone comes up with an idea that TPTB has a hidden agenda, that too is what they do.
Basically, it's win/win for the "outside of the box" thinker, isn't it?
What a way to think...smh
originally posted by: roadgravel
He is just as likely to be a time traveller from the future observing key terrorist events and just stood a little too close this time.
I thought he could be back researching the events that led to whatever is the outcome of this "terror war". If it is true it could be a bad sign for the outcome unless scholastic research in the future uses time travel much like a library or the internet of today.
But I wonder about Boston, it seems to be a bit of an outlier. Maybe his presence there is why he became involved or volunteered.