It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
An article in the 22nd issue of the official Islamic State (ISIS) mouthpiece Al-Naba, titled “Beit Al-Maqdis[1] – First and Foremost an Issue of Shari’a Law,”[2] sets out the organization’s position on Palestine and the war on Israel, from both the ideological and practical perspectives. The article states that the fight against Israel does not take precedence over jihad against the infidels elsewhere, and, furthermore, that the fight against the infidels within – that is, against the Muslim rulers and governments – is even more important. According to ISIS, prioritization of the war on Israel is a deviation from the principles of Islam, because jihad is aimed at establishing the religion and implementing shari’a law. Since the entire world except for the ISIS-controlled areas is ruled by infidels, the article asks why war against the Jews is being prioritized over the war against other infidels. It also states that restricting jihad’s target to war solely against the Jews is a forbidden alteration in the laws of Allah. In ISIS’s view, if there is to be any prioritization of jihad in any one place, then it should be to liberate the Islamic holy sites of Mecca and Medina from the clutches of the Saudi royal family.
originally posted by: wisvol
a reply to: Ohanka
Notice how Israel does not officially support ISIS?
Maybe because someone is using that copyright to do all sorts of shenanigans?
"Could it be that you are petulant about the Kingdom's efforts to support the Egyptian people when they rose [up] against the Muslim Brothers' government and you supported [this government]? Or is it the late King Abdullah's (God rest his soul) bang on the table when he last met you and told you 'No more red lines, Mr. President.' "Or is it because you have pivoted [towards] Iran so much that you equate the Kingdom's 80 years of constant friendship with America [with the behavior of] an Iranian leadership that continues to describe America as the biggest enemy, that continues to arm, fund and support sectarian militias in the Arab and Muslim world, that continues to harbor and host Al-Qaeda leaders, that continues to prevent the election of a Lebanese president through Hezbollah, which is identified by your government as a terrorist organization, that continues to kill the Syrian Arab people in league with Bashar Assad? "No, Mr. Obama. We are not the 'free riders' to whom you refer. We lead from the front and we accept our mistakes and rectify them. We will continue to [regard] the American people as our ally, and don't forget that when the chips were down and George Herbert Walker Bush sent American soldiers to repel, [along] with our troops, Saddam's aggression against Kuwait, [our] soldiers stood shoulder to shoulder with [your] soldiers. Mr. Obama, that is who we are."
How many time did Iran attacked another country ? How many time has the rest of the World been threatened by North Korea ? Why Iran ? Are you a supporter that the Jews worth more than the Goyims ?
What for weapon shipment ? Those for Assad. Because the one for the so called 'moderate rebels', guess where they come from ?
What for weapon shipment ? Those for Assad. Because the one for the so called 'moderate rebels', guess where they come from ?
originally posted by: wisvol
Iran doesn't seem to attack other countries, and actually Israel doesn't either.
North Korea is not an actual threat to anyone imo, unless China decides they want their moneys.
Why Iran what?
Financially? In nose size? Gimme context.
How do you explain this hypocrisy :
Meanwhile in Germany : That’ll be $1,391 for Rescued Mossad Agents, Please
originally posted by: angryhulk
I think quite a lot of countries remain untouched, not just Israel.