Physics of Ionising Radiation.

originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance

originally posted by: Nochzwei
a reply to: dashen

my theory/ hypothesis is that dark matter/energy reside in the time domain

Time is not a "domain", and dark matter/dark energy don't exist. They're just placeholder terms.

Time is certainly a domain with 3 dimensions according to my theory/ hypothesis

originally posted by: Nochzwei

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: Nochzwei
a reply to: TerryDon79

the hoax you mention is purely your erroneous assumption

You have yet to show any tests done in a controlled environment. Why is that? Could it be that under strict control the whole thing doesn't do what it's meant to do?

First you need to prove something works before you can ask anyone of the physics behind it.

Lol do you want to do this controlled test?

Sure. Tell me exactly what I need and I will go down to the university and borrow a lab for a day.

And I'm not joking.

a reply to: Nochzwei

Space has three dimensions with time acting as a measurement of the movements of the contents of that space

originally posted by: Nochzwei
Am beginning to lean towards implosion of high energy dark matter /dark energy particles from the time domain into our domain to be the cause of the radiation affects from the machine

Are you just watching episode of Star Trek and "assuming" it's real?

"Time domain" ? You have no idea what you're talking about and neither do we...

originally posted by: Nochzwei

originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance

originally posted by: Nochzwei
a reply to: dashen

my theory/ hypothesis is that dark matter/energy reside in the time domain

Time is not a "domain", and dark matter/dark energy don't exist. They're just placeholder terms.

Time is certainly a domain with 3 dimensions according to my theory/ hypothesis

Your "theory/hypothesis" is one born of ignorance, and has no basis in reality.

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: Nochzwei

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: Nochzwei
a reply to: TerryDon79

the hoax you mention is purely your erroneous assumption

You have yet to show any tests done in a controlled environment. Why is that? Could it be that under strict control the whole thing doesn't do what it's meant to do?

First you need to prove something works before you can ask anyone of the physics behind it.

Lol do you want to do this controlled test?

Sure. Tell me exactly what I need and I will go down to the university and borrow a lab for a day.

And I'm not joking.

I'll do the same. Give us the parameters of the experiment, Nochzwei.

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: Nochzwei

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: Nochzwei
a reply to: TerryDon79

the hoax you mention is purely your erroneous assumption

You have yet to show any tests done in a controlled environment. Why is that? Could it be that under strict control the whole thing doesn't do what it's meant to do?

First you need to prove something works before you can ask anyone of the physics behind it.

Lol do you want to do this controlled test?

Sure. Tell me exactly what I need and I will go down to the university and borrow a lab for a day.

And I'm not joking.

All you need to do is bring your test equipment to the site

originally posted by: Nochzwei

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: Nochzwei

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: Nochzwei
a reply to: TerryDon79

the hoax you mention is purely your erroneous assumption

You have yet to show any tests done in a controlled environment. Why is that? Could it be that under strict control the whole thing doesn't do what it's meant to do?

First you need to prove something works before you can ask anyone of the physics behind it.

Lol do you want to do this controlled test?

Sure. Tell me exactly what I need and I will go down to the university and borrow a lab for a day.

And I'm not joking.

All you need to do is bring your test equipment to the site

That's not exactly how it works, now is it?

For it to be a completely unbiased, scientific test I would need to build said device the exact same way as you claim it to work. That way I can see exactly what has been used to build it and can calibrate certain equipment to account for any excess heat, electricity etc that might be caused due to bad design, unearthed circuits and so on.

The only way possible is to bring any instrumentation under the sun to confirm wt you see in the video
reply to: TerryDon79

a reply to: Nochzwei

Oh ok. I think I'll pass.

I've seen that scam plenty of times.

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: Nochzwei

Oh ok. I think I'll pass.

I've seen that scam plenty of times.

this ain't a scam for sure, you can measure the rise in base of the machine and you can measure time dilation and ionising radiation with the right instrumentation.

originally posted by: Nochzwei

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: Nochzwei

Oh ok. I think I'll pass.

I've seen that scam plenty of times.

this ain't a scam for sure, you can measure the rise in base of the machine and you can measure time dilation and ionising radiation with the right instrumentation.

Typical scam is along the lines of "It works and there is science to prove it! Come and test it if you don't believe me!"

Problem is is there's no science behind it. I can come test it with any tools I want, but that won't prove anything unless I build it myself to see exactly what goes into it.

I can test the weight reducing? Simple see saw would give the impression of weight loss.

I can test ionising radiation? X-rays are precisely that.

I can test time dilation? How about you get 2 stopwatches, put one on the machine, one in your hand. Have both in camera view and we can indeed see if there's any time dilation.

At the moment you have an X-ray machine on a seesaw. Nothing has been proven.

a reply to: TerryDon79

Lol famous last words.

see saw? - lol you can measure rise in all 4 sides of the base
x ray or some weird radiation machine ?- could be
time dilation with stop clocks ?- you have to address the internal clock of the atom, so you need a beta decay source along with a counter

a reply to: Nochzwei

A see saw also raises objects from all four sides if it's being lifted from the center.

Yes a stop watch. Time dilation would effect the stop watch within your (not yet) hypothetical field.

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: Nochzwei

A see saw also raises objects from all four sides if it's being lifted from the center.

Yes a stop watch. Time dilation would effect the stop watch within your (not yet) hypothetical field.

lol excuses.
you can see under the machine cant you?
stop watch not really unless its an atomic clock

originally posted by: Nochzwei

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: Nochzwei

A see saw also raises objects from all four sides if it's being lifted from the center.

Yes a stop watch. Time dilation would effect the stop watch within your (not yet) hypothetical field.

lol excuses.
you can see under the machine cant you?
stop watch not really unless its an atomic clock

So it's time dilation on such a small scale that you can't measure it with a stop watch? Yeah, sounds completely plausible to me.

Why won't you let me build it to see if it works? Is it because it doesn't? If you're scared I'd run away with this tech is even sign a non disclosure agreement (as long as there are clauses that I can actually disclose if it works or not).

Also, why wasn't it tested under strictly controlled environment? Why outside where everything can interact with it?

You've not shown us anything and you want physics for something that doesn't even have a proof of concept. How about you come up with a little bit of information and we can all see how much of a fraud you really are?

originally posted by: Nochzwei

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: Nochzwei

Oh ok. I think I'll pass.

I've seen that scam plenty of times.

this ain't a scam for sure, you can measure the rise in base of the machine and you can measure time dilation and ionising radiation with the right instrumentation.

If that's the case, then give us the information to do so in a controlled laboratory environment. Until then, it's a scam, and you're a liar.

a reply to: dashen

It is a term used as a place holder to explain why there is a bunch of unaccounted-for mass in the universe

Well...that and being the driver of the continuing and ever accelerating expansion of the matter present in the Universe.

Which, by the way, seems to have been able to break relativity, since the expansion has at times, been faster than the speed of light...if you think about age of Universe X matter expansion.

a reply to: TerryDon79

Lol calling me fraud or liar wont work. Building possible only under license agreement and NDA

originally posted by: Nochzwei
a reply to: TerryDon79

Lol calling me fraud or liar wont work. Building possible only under license agreement and NDA

That's fine with me. As long as there a reasonable clauses that I can divulge if it actually works or not. You can email me them, I'll print, sign, scan, send back. Want me to pm you my email?