Where is the Bern?

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: interupt42

That's opinion. I don't think they lied. Where are the perjury charges?

LOL, you really don't think they were purposely trying to be untruthful in the following two events?

However he was charged with perjury, but wasn't convicted because a plea deal that he took to give up his law license for 5 years in order to stop the investigation and avoid prosecution.

Mr Clinton and Robert Ray, the Whitewater prosecutor, worked out their deal late last year. Mr Ray promised not to prosecute the president when he left office if Mr Clinton agreed to the suspension of his Arkansas law license for a significant period. The White House meeting between the two eventually led to the deal that spared Mr Clinton the prospect of indictment.

Now you have the honourable sniper diving Hillary under investigation by the gov't after her impeached husband made a plea deal during his presidency.

LOL., its got to be awkward to justify the Clintons ethical grounds.







Yes, those are some worthy ethical people to have in office, LOL

a reply to: interupt42

The Clinton's were only named as witnesses in whitewater. Also what was the findings of the FBI OH yeah, that L Jean Lewis' referral was without merit. The Clinton's were never prosecuted after several inquiries failed to find sufficient evidence.

Who cares who blew who in that other matter. It didn't stop him from being a good president and if his wife could forgive him that's the only person who mattered.

a reply to: Sillyolme

The Clinton's were only named as witnesses in whitewater

So he was disbarred and impeached for only being a witness? Not according to this.

Mr Clinton and Robert Ray, the Whitewater prosecutor, worked out their deal late last year. Mr Ray promised not to prosecute the president when he left office if Mr Clinton agreed to the suspension of his Arkansas law license for a significant period. The White House meeting between the two eventually led to the deal that spared Mr Clinton the prospect of indictment

they have a history of lying and unethical behavior .

So again you honestly think that Hillary was honest with her sniper comment as was bill with his he did not have sexual relations? The point is that they have no issues in lying or manipulating the facts to get ahead.

The Clintons, Bush and their supporters who do everything to dismiss their unethical behaviours are the reason this country is so plagued with problems. Heck of a Job Hillary supporter.

a reply to: Sillyolme

Her Flip flops:

The Ultimate Guide To Hillary's Flip Flops

Her Scandals:

From Whitewater to Benghazi: A Clinton-Scandal Primer

a reply to: amicktd

If you believe it. Benghazi hearings are OVER. They didn't find any wrong doing. Whitewater was investigated. Not the Clinton's but their friends and associates. No wrong doing was found.

Issues and their importance change in this world. We wouldn't want someone stuck to an idea if that idea doesn't serve any longer. Being able to see an issue and change our view on it is an asset not a liability. Otherwise we'd still be riding horses or carriages.

a reply to: Sillyolme



Select Committee Announces Scheduled Testimony of Additional Witnesses
February 25, 2016

Thursday, February 25, 2016

Witness: Gentry Smith, former Deputy Assistant Secretary for Countermeasures within the State Department’s Bureau of Diplomatic Security*



Tuesday, March 1, 2016

Witness: An eyewitness to the attacks from the national security community



Thursday, March 3, 2016

Witness: James “Sandy” Winnefeld, Jr., former Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff*



Friday, March 4, 2016

Witness: Susan Curley, Managing Director of the State Department’s Office of Management Policy, Rightsizing and Innovation*

a reply to: xuenchen

And you expect these handful will turn around the results of the prior hearings do you? Why?

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: xuenchen

And you expect these handful will turn around the results of the prior hearings do you? Why?

?? Where did I say I expect anything ??

a reply to: xuenchen

What's your point then?

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: xuenchen

What's your point then?

Apparently the Benghazi hearings are not over as you would have people believe.



The pressure is on Hillary.

a reply to: xuenchen

And that is why I asked if you think this handful of people are going to make a difference to the outcome. Or are you just stressing the point that the hearings are not really over? For all intents and purposes they are.



www.latimes.com...

I thought HIllary didn't have any more states that could win?

I see the cruz is out threads where are the Bern threads after winning indiana?



Are bernie supporters succumbing to the evil witch winning?
It looks like the Bern has been flaming out around here?


I really hope bernie and his supporters aren't being quite in preparing to endorse hillary ,when she is everything he says he is against .

a reply to: interupt42

No - the Bern is still very strong here - we just erected a wind-screen. The stinky emissions from the opposition got overwhelmingly unpleasant.

originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
a reply to: interupt42

No - the Bern is still very strong here - we just erected a wind-screen. The stinky emissions from the opposition got overwhelmingly unpleasant.

I hope so . Not looking forward to a trump or hillary presidency.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: xuenchen

And that is why I asked if you think this handful of people are going to make a difference to the outcome. Or are you just stressing the point that the hearings are not really over? For all intents and purposes they are.

Ignoring the hearings and/or wearing blinders does not mean the hearings are over.

The hearings will continue if Clinton and Obama keep dribbling the requested information out in small parcels.

a reply to: interupt42

What? There are nine more states to hold democratic primaries yet.
The republicans have seven more but with only one candidate I guess they don't matter.

a reply to: interupt42

They are not very different in their platform and she certainly isn't everything he's against . They are from the same party remember.

I don't understand everyone's issue with the flip-flopping either.

I have vastly different opinions on certain things today than I had 8 years ago.

With time you gain knowledge and experience and your view on a certain issue can change drastically as you change your perspective. People can learn and grow.

a reply to: Lucidparadox

You actually make a good point. I think most people take issue when the flip flopping is only done to pander at convenient times.