It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Sargeras
a reply to: Bigburgh
I'm a veteran, and I believe only vets should be able to vote.
But why land owners?
Why should someone get a vote because they are rich compared to most Americans?
originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: Sargeras
Well considering after 1812 no one really bothered us at all and we had a really weak military up til WW2 I'd say no.
originally posted by: Soloprotocol
originally posted by: Sargeras
a reply to: Bigburgh
I'm a veteran, and I believe only vets should be able to vote.
But why land owners?
Why should someone get a vote because they are rich compared to most Americans?
Why should you get a vote over say a Refuse collector or a Seamstress.? What makes you the special one.?
originally posted by: Soloprotocol
originally posted by: Sargeras
a reply to: Bigburgh
I'm a veteran, and I believe only vets should be able to vote.
But why land owners?
Why should someone get a vote because they are rich compared to most Americans?
Why should you get a vote over say a Refuse collector or a Seamstress.? What makes you the special one.?
originally posted by: Nyiah
originally posted by: Soloprotocol
originally posted by: Sargeras
a reply to: Bigburgh
I'm a veteran, and I believe only vets should be able to vote.
But why land owners?
Why should someone get a vote because they are rich compared to most Americans?
Why should you get a vote over say a Refuse collector or a Seamstress.? What makes you the special one.?
Because he thinks his job choice makes him a speshul snowflake with speshul rights.
Ain't how it works. And if that's how he thinks it works, he's free to try to find public support to change voter laws. Or leave the country when the pitchforks come after him for trying, his choice.
originally posted by: Sargeras
a reply to: Bigburgh
I'm a veteran, and I believe only vets should be able to vote.
But why land owners?
Why should someone get a vote because they are rich compared to most Americans?
originally posted by: Nyiah
originally posted by: Soloprotocol
originally posted by: Sargeras
a reply to: Bigburgh
I'm a veteran, and I believe only vets should be able to vote.
But why land owners?
Why should someone get a vote because they are rich compared to most Americans?
Why should you get a vote over say a Refuse collector or a Seamstress.? What makes you the special one.?
Because he thinks his job choice makes him a speshul snowflake with speshul rights.
Ain't how it works. And if that's how he thinks it works, he's free to try to find public support to change voter laws. Or leave the country when the pitchforks come after him for trying, his choice.
originally posted by: Nyiah
a reply to: Sargeras
Backtrack fail. You just said it a few posts up for everyone to see:
originally posted by: Sargeras
a reply to: Bigburgh
I'm a veteran, and I believe only vets should be able to vote.
But why land owners?
Why should someone get a vote because they are rich compared to most Americans?
originally posted by: Soloprotocol
originally posted by: Nyiah
originally posted by: Soloprotocol
originally posted by: Sargeras
a reply to: Bigburgh
I'm a veteran, and I believe only vets should be able to vote.
But why land owners?
Why should someone get a vote because they are rich compared to most Americans?
Why should you get a vote over say a Refuse collector or a Seamstress.? What makes you the special one.?
Because he thinks his job choice makes him a speshul snowflake with speshul rights.
Ain't how it works. And if that's how he thinks it works, he's free to try to find public support to change voter laws. Or leave the country when the pitchforks come after him for trying, his choice.
You get a lot of that with todays ex military. The older generation when they came back from a "Real War" couldn't even talk about it. They wanted and expected nothing and just got on with things.
Todays ex Military seem to think we should all bow down and worship at there feet. They should remember this, When you invade a foreign country, you are not fighting for anyone's freedom, The guys shooting back are fighting for their Freedom.
originally posted by: Sargeras
originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: Sargeras
Well considering after 1812 no one really bothered us at all and we had a really weak military up til WW2 I'd say no.
Since WW2 industrial military might has gone world wide.
Since WW2 Russia would have likely invaded us if not for our nukes and military.
Only our military strength stopped Stalin from going after the world.
Hence settled for all of East Europe, because we wouldn't let him take more.
That is what caused the cold war.
originally posted by: Abysha
Jesus... we'd live in a nightmare if that were the case. I'm thinking feudalism pre-Crusade Franks or just a
straight up military aristocracy if that happened.
I really doubt he would be saying that if he were found unfit to serve when he enlisted.