Bernie Sanders Calls for All Guns Not Used Specifically for Hunting to be Outlawed!

originally posted by: macman
a reply to: vjr1113

The 2nd Amendment spells out exactly what is covered for the Rights of the individual regarding firearms.

There is no Right called out regarding vehicles.

Care to try again?

If you are scared of homicide, stay home. Stop trying to force your fears and views on others. Or is that too much to ask for?

doesnt matter car laws arent in the Bill. obviously car laws arent in the Bill. im talking about regulations. if you dont think homicide is a problem then we cant even argue.

thats your best solution to reduce homicide? stay home? brilliant. then lets do away with all gun laws, wont matter because everyone can just stay home. gee why didnt i think of that.

a reply to: MOMof3

Never hide ,FACE your fears or die from them.

originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: butcherguy

"The SSK .950 JDJ is an absolute beast. Made by SSK Industries, each bullet is over four inches long, weighs over half a pound and costs about $40. There are only three rifles ever made that can fire the round. The weapons weigh between 85 and 120 pounds and produce a recoil capable of injuring its shooter."

From an earlier post by cavtrooper about the newest WMD that can rip a body apart. Imagine a child. Who are the targets? Practicing for what?

And there are what, three of those rifles in existence?
No reasonable person would want to shoot that rifle, the punishment is far too much to make it worthwhile.
Oh, and the 1968 Federal Firearms Act stipulates that no weapon can have a bullet with a diameter larger than 0.500”. Anything larger is classified as a “Destructive Device” and is banned for use by the average citizen.

We shoot for the experience of shooting sometimes.
We like it ,it's like golf.

a reply to: vjr1113

Do away with all guns laws???? Well now you are actually getting it. They are Unconstitutional anyways.

The solution to stay home is for YOU.

I have no problem going out into the world. I'm armed.

a reply to: dismanrc

You don't have to tell me that!!

First time I went pig-huntin', I borrowed his .357 mag Desert Eagle. Love that gun!! I found a very nice medium size pig, and He found me...

It took a full magazine to put that berserk, blood-mad warrior down. He finally died at what seemed like my feet, in reality he wasn't quite that close, but it sure felt that way...

I needlessly inflicted pain and suffering that a larger caliber would have prevented. It was a lesson well learned.

The guys I was hunting with heard the volley fire and came running...I nearly brained him. The only time in my hunting life I've ever feared for my life. He'd have torn me to shreads.

The next time I went, I brought my Ruger .44 mag. Much better results. One shot to put him down.

In the next year or two when I relocate to the south, I fully intend to hunt feral pigs as often as the law allows, and a large caliber handgun is the best way, IMHO, to do it. Quick to target, easy to carry in brush.

So Sanders would want the DP12 banned.

LOL.



It would work pretty well for the zombie apocalypse.

senile old fool who should check himself into a retirement home ..............

a reply to: frostie

i believe thats just as bad

originally posted by: neo96
So Sanders would want the DP12 banned.

LOL.

It would work pretty well for the zombie apocalypse.

I would hunt rabbits with that if it meant other people could possess it.
But we know that Bernie isn't being honest about that hunting thing anyway.

It's all part of the Socialist program to put everyone and everything under government control.
a reply to: infolurker

Oops, I'm over your limit. But your zero total makes up for it. I have a box full of tools that I use for different things. So, under your reasoning, there should be a one tool per person limit. Or were you even aware that different guns are
used for different things?
a reply to: Eilasvaleleyn

originally posted by: macman
a reply to: vjr1113

Do away with all guns laws???? Well now you are actually getting it. They are Unconstitutional anyways.

The solution to stay home is for YOU.

I have no problem going out into the world. I'm armed.

what a disaster thats would be, fully automatic weapons without background checks available to everyone from depressed teens to gang members. but its okay, as long as your wild west fantasy comes true. i live in reality.

you want to live in a place any weapons are available to everyone easily? move to Afghanistan. and dont be afraid to move there either, im sure your guns will keep you safe for as long as you think they will.

a reply to: vjr1113

NO, YOU live in SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA so you are already regarded as being damaged goods by a few here.
People would be VERY polite because that is what the military people would want,they already HAVE the skills to USE those scary guns.
If I'm going into Afghanistan I 'll take the rest of the original 1/7 Cav CAB unit I saw combat with and we won't follow the pentagons wishes,it might take a month.

a reply to: cavtrooper7

Go with the other military personnel?
Why would you need to do that?

Afghanistan is really safe, it's full of guns.

originally posted by: cavtrooper7
a reply to: vjr1113

NO, YOU live in SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA so you are already regarded as being damaged goods by a few here.

ok i live in a certain place, therefore you can determine what kind of person i am. is that all you bring? insults? you want to argue with me, bring logic, manners, and facts. not vulgar off topic personal attacks.

a reply to: infolurker

I'm surprised that, for someone who claims to lurk for information, you so shamelessly failed to properly contextualize Mr. Sanders' main idea. In the clip, he implicitly and explicitly references two types of weapons: those intended for hunting game, and those intended for killing human(s). Churlish arguments about all guns possessing the capability to kill humans aside, Mr. Sanders is clearly making reference to weapons that are, by design, intended to efficiently kill multiple people. As opposed to, oh, multiple elk or multiple chipmunks or multiple feral cats.

To top it off, you act so surprised that a democratic socialist would have the temerity to either hold such a view, or to espouse said view when prompted to do so. Glad to see you've trivialized his belief as a "zinger," but I guarantee you it isn't such a zinger for some of the folks who survived Aurora or any of the countless mass shootings over the past several years.

Good news is, he didn't ban logic or reasoning, so it isn't too late for you to apply either one.

a reply to: vjr1113

Funny how you glossed over the rest.
A telling factor here.
AND NO .
I will speak as I please THERE is no vulgarity,we don't actually HAVE a recourse for microagressions here.

a reply to: Eilasvaleleyn

When injecting one'sself into a thread it pays to read it....
move to Afghanistan. and dont be afraid to move there either, im sure your guns will keep you safe for as long as you think they will."

a reply to: cavtrooper7

It's just, I've been told so many times that more guns = safer.