It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: vjr1113
originally posted by: introvert
Trump is correct on Hussein and the Middle East in general.
i disagree, saddam had to go, and like marco said, the arab spring was started by the arabs
Saddam, as bad as he was, was the man that kept the ME in-check. We had no business to be in Iraq, regardless of what happened on 9/11.
originally posted by: interupt42
a reply to: introvert
Trump is correct on Hussein and the Middle East in general.
Yeah. Unfortunately, it doesn't look like things has gotten any better after they were removed, has it.
It's worse and we have been as much of a problem in the region as any dictator.
originally posted by: vjr1113
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: vjr1113
originally posted by: introvert
Trump is correct on Hussein and the Middle East in general.
i disagree, saddam had to go, and like marco said, the arab spring was started by the arabs
Saddam, as bad as he was, was the man that kept the ME in-check. We had no business to be in Iraq, regardless of what happened on 9/11.
originally posted by: interupt42
a reply to: introvert
Trump is correct on Hussein and the Middle East in general.
Yeah. Unfortunately, it doesn't look like things has gotten any better after they were removed, has it.
It's worse and we have been as much of a problem in the region as any dictator.
well there you go, i dont believe in a necessary evil, and you do. People that say saddam was a bad guy, dont know what theyre talking about. there was no way he should have be left alive.
Edit: Didn't you try to hit your mother with a hammer?
People that say saddam was a bad guy,
People that say saddam wasn't a bad guy, dont know what theyre talking about
originally posted by: kosmicjack
I can see a stealth independent candidate emerging for sure after this debacle.
i mean if you dont think removing a brutal dicatator isnt necessary, we differ in opinion.
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: kosmicjack
I can see a stealth independent candidate emerging for sure after this debacle.
Ron Paul?
Wouldn't that be a plot twist fitting of the soap opera American politics has become?