It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: RP2SticksOfDynamite
Remain at all cost.............................................
David Cameron says Boris Johnson shut down Commons to 'restrict' Brexit debate
www.msn.com...
"Whatever your decision, I will do my best to deliver it"
“I am absolutely clear a referendum is a referendum, it’s a once in a generation, once in a lifetime opportunity and the result determines the outcome ... You can’t have neverendums, you have referendums.”
Correct. BJ asked for the conference to be moved indoors but the Lux PM refused yet previous conferences were held indoors so it was a planned trap and yet another example of the EU mafia style approach to getting their way.
originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: RP2SticksOfDynamite
Was Bettel's anger over Brexit or that Johnson had sidestepped his trap , refusing to move the press conference indoors because of the noisy protesters shows he was just out to embarrass the British PM.
Typical example of EU leaders and their dirty tricks.
Surely the British people would want us to get away from such an environment / club that operates in such a devious way!
Brexit U-turn: More than a third of Remainers now want EU exit in huge turnaround
www.express.co.uk...
For this reason among others the Supreme Court will rule in BJ's favour. And the references by Lord Keen to the 1867 prorog law and the 1600's (avoided by Lord Pannick)will help has will the fact that Parliament could have voted to prevent a queens speech but did not do so!
originally posted by: UKTruth
This week in the Supreme Court is a pivotal time for this country - not because of Brexit - but because we are at a crossroads. If judges make the decision to interfere in politics without any standing in law then we are on the road to destruction. Litigation within the political sphere will explode and we will be left in the sorry state that exists in the US, where a single court can interfere with democracy and tie decision making in knots to push political agenda.
Our democracy will change forever and the game will be about who can influence and coerce judges - far removed from the people.
Dangerous times.
originally posted by: RP2SticksOfDynamite
For this reason among others the Supreme Court will rule in BJ's favour. And the references by Lord Keen to the 1867 prorog law and the 1600's (avoided by Lord Pannick)will help has will the fact that Parliament could have voted to prevent a queens speech but did not do so!
originally posted by: UKTruth
This week in the Supreme Court is a pivotal time for this country - not because of Brexit - but because we are at a crossroads. If judges make the decision to interfere in politics without any standing in law then we are on the road to destruction. Litigation within the political sphere will explode and we will be left in the sorry state that exists in the US, where a single court can interfere with democracy and tie decision making in knots to push political agenda.
Our democracy will change forever and the game will be about who can influence and coerce judges - far removed from the people.
Dangerous times.
Lord Keen referenced it in the afternoon!
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: RP2SticksOfDynamite
For this reason among others the Supreme Court will rule in BJ's favour. And the references by Lord Keen to the 1867 prorog law and the 1600's (avoided by Lord Pannick)will help has will the fact that Parliament could have voted to prevent a queens speech but did not do so!
originally posted by: UKTruth
This week in the Supreme Court is a pivotal time for this country - not because of Brexit - but because we are at a crossroads. If judges make the decision to interfere in politics without any standing in law then we are on the road to destruction. Litigation within the political sphere will explode and we will be left in the sorry state that exists in the US, where a single court can interfere with democracy and tie decision making in knots to push political agenda.
Our democracy will change forever and the game will be about who can influence and coerce judges - far removed from the people.
Dangerous times.
Was strugling to hear even any mention of a law today - Lord Pannick seemed to be discussing politics.
originally posted by: RP2SticksOfDynamite
Boris Johnson warns Supreme Court judges not to 'enter the political arena' by blocking suspension of Parliament - as Government refuses to rule out proroguing AGAIN if it loses the case
www.msn.com... s-government-refuses-to-rule-out-proroguing-again-if-it-loses-the-case/ar-AAHrF4g?li=BBoPWjQ