It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Now if they want all these "conspiracy theories" be put to rest, all they have to do is a post mortem.....even though he's been embalmed. It's better than nothing.
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: dianajune
Now if they want all these "conspiracy theories" be put to rest, all they have to do is a post mortem.....even though he's been embalmed. It's better than nothing.
I admit, I probably wouldn't feel any better. It's just too little, too late.
originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: dianajune
Now if they want all these "conspiracy theories" be put to rest, all they have to do is a post mortem.....even though he's been embalmed. It's better than nothing.
I'm beginning to think that they (the mysterious they at that), do want all these conspiracy theories and so the story is being played as it is on purpose.
What else is going on that we would have our attention on otherwise?
originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: Indigo5
My question is, if they are absolutely certain that there was no nefarious activity, why is that particular room still off limits if the rest of the scene has been released?
It almost seems to me that this story is being purposely fueled with innuendo and not so subtle inconsistencies specifically to generate more buzz.
There are a number of things going on - FBI wants to indict Hillary (whether or not this will be allowed by our POTUS remains to be seen. Loretta Lynch has been brought up as a possible replacement for Scalia, which could screw up Hillary's indictment as Lynch would be the official to get things rolling. Then there's WWIII - which is just about underway. Our failing economy - imo we are on the precipice of another Great Depression that will make the one my grandparents went through look like a walk in the park.
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: Indigo5
My question is, if they are absolutely certain that there was no nefarious activity, why is that particular room still off limits if the rest of the scene has been released?
Is the room still off limits?
It almost seems to me that this story is being purposely fueled with innuendo and not so subtle inconsistencies specifically to generate more buzz.
There was some less than well managed PR surrounding the event and the Ranch owner didn't think through his wording well...but there was going to speculation regardless of "fuel".
originally posted by: queenofswords
originally posted by: IAMTAT
The new Pope is just as pro-climate change legislation as Obama. Scalia was in the way of both's agenda.
Oh, ITAT! You have really piqued my interest in this now!! (And I have so much to do today...I can't stay here !)
originally posted by: queenofswords
originally posted by: IAMTAT
The new Pope is just as pro-climate change legislation as Obama. Scalia was in the way of both's agenda.
Oh, ITAT! You have really piqued my interest in this now!! (And I have so much to do today...I can't stay here !)
originally posted by: IAMTAT
The incredible fact that BOTH Obama AND the Pope came out to personally attack Trump within days of each other (With Scalia's death in between their denunciations)...means they are genuinely scared that their mutually-convergent agendas are in jeopardy.
Desperate men do desperate things. Scalia was in the way...and both were afraid that it's no longer a 'sure thing' that the next President will be a progressive who would've normally received the opportunity to replace Scalia and several others.